mirror of
https://github.com/Bubberstation/Bubberstation.git
synced 2026-07-12 16:44:43 +01:00
masterfixes
26 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
d25c6201f4 |
Standerdizing currency symbols Part 2 (#94259)
## About The Pull Request Converts almost all non-constant, non-tgui usages of all variantions of "credit" and "cr" Everything seems in order, tested most the currencies. <img width="905" height="119" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3fa005a7-a114-426c-9646-b81f68bc2dec" /> <img width="255" height="128" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/14c83b54-4fd9-4bee-838f-5b1c03939d9a" /> ## Why It's Good For The Game Same justification as https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/94128 Just easier to mantain/adjust the grammer/names of our money ## Changelog 🆑 spellcheck: minor cleanup on some usecases of "credits" /🆑 |
||
|
|
e7bd1c0e02 |
[MDB Ignore] Replaces MOST Emergency NanoMed vendors with new First Aid Stations. (Also reverts advanced medkits in bridge and buffs back nanomeds) (#92677)
## About The Pull Request ### Main changes Across all station maps, emergency shuttles, and arrivals shuttles, the Emergency NanoMeds (wall mounted medical supply vendors) have been replcaed with Deforest First Aid Stations. <img width="303" height="410" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/efc1133b-09d8-4a35-8690-d8b1ebae7cba" /> Deforest First Aid Station have an internal supply of healing which recharges slowly over time (1/10th of the pool is recharged every 30 seconds). To access this healing, users must insert their arm into the machine with left click. (Or you can mouse drop other people into it.) Once their arm is in place, some of the internal supply will be used up to heal the user. The internal supply can heal brute, burn, tox, and blood loss. This is straight, instant healing - so it doesn't trigger allergies or nothing. However, if you insert a robotic arm, it will refuse to heal you. Users are charged every time healing is dispensed - 2.5 credits per unit of damage healed. Payments go to the medical budget, same as kiosks. You can also right click the machine to dispense gauze for 16 credits. On **red alert** (or for medical staff, or on emergency shuttles), all charges are waived. (It's free) Also you can emag it so it causes damage instead. Funny. ### Other changes: Buffs the contents of emergency nanomeds Reverts bridge advanced medkits to normal medkits ## Why It's Good For The Game Wall vending changes: People want options to heal chip damage beyond visiting the bar but we also don't really want people to load up on boat loads of medical supplies. So here we are: A machine fully capable of healing minor injuries that you can carry along with you. If you're missing like 4-6 brute or toxin damage, you can visit a first aid station and pay 15 credits to top yourself off. This is of course on top of all the other options available to you, such as getting a hearty meal, some variety of drink from the bar, sleeping in dorms, water coolers, etc. The limited pool + cost requirement prevents you from going 0-100, so you still have to go to medbay if you are severely wounded or your ID was stolen. Nanomed changes: Now that they are considerably less common once again, they can have a decent stock. Advanced medkit changes: I don't really see the justification behind handing these out so freely, and given the medical stations will have adequate extra healing for the command staff, they don't need these. ## Changelog 🆑 Melber balance: Advanced first aid kits in the bridge are back to being normal first aid kids balance: Emergency Nanomed vendors have larger stocks and better supplies add: Replaces a majority of Emergency Nanomeds on stations and shuttles with Deforest First Aid Stations. Left clicking these stationary machines will heal minor damage and blood loss over time - at a (small) price. Right clicking them will provide gauze, also for a price. All costs are waived on shuttles, during red alert, or for medical staff. You can also click-drag to have other mobs use the machine. However, robotic limbs need not apply. /🆑 |
||
|
|
67d27ffe91 |
Accounting Glowup: Advances, Pay raises and cuts, and more (#92419)
## About The Pull Request Fixes #92188 1. The Accounting console now has a new UI <img width="757" height="486" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c6ce73f-ae1c-4a54-b6ba-bcc3b3232d13" /> 2. The Accounting console can now dish out advances on paychecks, giving you for full paycheck early. You can give up to 3 advances. This of course means your next paycheck is not paid out when relevant. 3. The Accounting console can now change paycheck sizes of crewmembers - up to 1.5x and down to 0.5x. ## Why It's Good For The Game - Gives the HoP some more duties, now being able to dish out money on request, reward good behavior, or punish bad behavior. ## Changelog 🆑 Melbert add: Accounting Console: New UI! add: Accounting Console: Now can give advances to crewmembers add: Accounting Console: Can now give pay raises or pay cuts add: Accounting Console: Now only printable in the security lathe add: Accounting Console: A spare board is now now found in secure tech storage. fix: Fix vending machines adding payments to audit log twice. fix: Non-crewmembers are no longer shown in the accounting console /🆑 --------- Co-authored-by: ArcaneMusic <41715314+ArcaneMusic@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
dc5e87e545 |
Prevents Debug ID Card from Polluting Cargo Budget By Doing It Right (#82214)
## About The Pull Request Fixes #81755 Alright instead of piggybacking off the departmental/non-departmental distinction and prevent ourselves from constantly abusing the cargo budget in order to achieve the very-specific effect of not wanting players to abuse this card in certain contexts let's just leverage the framework and expand it so that we can snowflake for admin/`holder` use cases in stuff like debugging code on a local server while preventing some player from stealing it off a newbie admin and immediately wrecking the economy (although it is funny). ## Why It's Good For The Game Probably a bad idea to continue to abuse the cargo budget like this since the only reason why it's structured that way is just for specific use-case exemptions in certain contexts - let's just do our own thing now :3 ## Changelog 🆑 admin: Advanced Debug Cards will still provide a whole lot of access, but the way the money on those cards work is now a bit different. Players shouldn't be able to use the money on those cards in any context though, don't fret about that. Just know that the money printer goes wrrrr /🆑 --------- Co-authored-by: Zephyr <12817816+ZephyrTFA@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
9ac81e1a64 |
New station trait job: Human AI (#81681)
## About The Pull Request This PR does many things, I'll try to explain the basic/background stuff to the main thing first: 1. Adds a new remote that allows a human to function like an AI. It controls a fly that will fly around the station slowly, and when it reaches a machine then the person can interact with it as if they were an AI. This required changing a lot of silicon/AI checks with one that also checks for this remote, and some messing with shared ui state. 2. Moves req_access from the obj and bot to ``/atom/movable`` which lets it be shared between the two, no more copy-paste and one side lacking features/checks/signals the other has. 3. Adds a check for AI config for AI-related station traits, which was lacking prior Now for the good part... Adds a new station trait that replaces the AI with a Human. This person is equipped with an AI headset (including Binary), an advanced camera console, an omni door wand, the machine controller, and their laws. They are immune to the SAT's turrets (even if set to target borgs) and are slow outside of the SAT, mimicing the actions of the AI. They interact with the world through their advanced camera console, which allows them to do most AI stuff needed, and the holopad they can connect to without having to ring first (like Command can). They are given a paper with the laws they must follow, but since they are human they are able to bend it. Cyborgs that run the default lawset are "slaved" to them via an unremovable law 0, so the Human AI can bend the laws if they really need to (for their own survival n such), and make the cyborgs obey their commands above laws, but in general this shouldn't be a frequent occurrence. This does take into account the unique AI trait, so it's not guaranteed Asimov. When this station trait rolls, all Intellicards, AI uploads, and AI core boards are destroyed and are unresearchable. They can be spawned by admins in-game if necessary. Maybe in the future we can also exclude Oldstation from this but I haven't really decided. Extra perks: Human AI spawns with a Robotic voicebox (unless they are a body purist) and teleport blocking implant, so they can't use teleporters to bypass their on-station slowdown. They also have an infinite laser pointer that can be used to blind through their camera console. This is unfortunately nerfed from the recent borg balance PR that removed its stun. This was meant to be the alternative to no longer being able to permanently lock borgs down like AIs can (or more than one, for that matter). They aren't affected by Roburgers, Acid, and Fuel's toxicity. Bots salute them like they do Beepsky (which is now a trait) They spawn with SyndEye to replace the AI's tracking ability They do not have a bank account ### The machine remote The machine remote has a little fly in it that flies to the machines it is pointed to, working as the arms and legs of the Human AI. It scans the machine and punches in the action the AI does, and is how the AI accesses basically anything. This fly slowly moves from one machine to the next, and can be recalled with Alt Click. It works on machines and bots. ### Video (Low quality to fit Github) https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/assets/53777086/e16509f8-8bed-42b5-9fbf-7e37165a11e8 ## Why It's Good For The Game I've seen a funny screenshot one day of a person replacing the AI by using a bunch of door remotes, camera console, crew monitoring console, and a few other things. I've been thinking about that for a few years and really wanted to make it official if not easier to make possible, because it is an incredibly funny interaction. This makes it a reality, and while they aren't as powerful as regular AIs, I think it makes for better and funnier in-game moments. With the same weight as Cargorilla (1), I hope this wouldn't be rolling too often and ruin rounds, but instead show off the different capabilities that Humans and AIs can do, to do the job of an AI. You win some you lose some. ## Changelog 🆑 JohnFulpWillard, Tattax add: Adds a new station trait job: The Human AI. /🆑 --------- Co-authored-by: MrMelbert <51863163+MrMelbert@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
d7cf8309c5 |
Arcargo: Vendor Cargo and Vending Machine Update (#81582)
Another one. ## About The Pull Request This pull request originally had a design doc that @Fikou and I worked on, but that was never really polished up for publishing quality so I'll forgo it for now and be as descript as possible here. ### Core changes - This pull request adds a new NTOS app to the game, the restock tracker. The restock tracker shows a comprehensive list of vending machines across the station, as long as there is a need for that vending machine to get restocked. - This has also been pre-installed into the cargo data disks. (`/obj/item/computer_disk/quartermaster`) - Vending machines now store a total of 20% of the cost of any purchase made within themselves into a small pool of cash. This only applies to premium and normal purchases, not to contraband, as they're technically not sanctioned by the company. - The restock tracker app will also track which vending machines have the most credits stored internally inside them. - By refilling a vending machine, the stored credits within are paid out to any crewmember who goes and restocks the station, while also paying out *half that amount to the cargo budget*, serving as a basic but otherwise easy tertiary money making method on the same level of complexity as doing bounties, with the added benefit of actually helping to assist the station for jobs like... assistant.  ### Break Stuff - Anyway, when you try and smash a vending machine open with a melee weapon of choice, it can now pay out 50 credits at a time as a way to make money at zero risk to yourself. - ~~Except for the horrible risk to yourself.~~  ### Cargo Specific Changes - Restock units may now be sold for a small profit as well, to incentivize cargo to keep the station stocked further. - The `STATION_TRAIT_VENDING_SHORTAGE` trait will now add a small amount of existing credits into the vending machines on station, to incentivize cargo to fix the issue during the round and not just push for an early shuttle call. Or, more accurately, provide the crew with a money making scheme to engage better with the station trait as it stands. ### This also refactors behavior on vending machines - This pull request also finally changes it so that vending machines now use the payment component, which as a consequence allows for the following improvements: * Vending machines may now pull from physical credits on your person, not just requiring you to have money on your ID card. * Vending machines may also use credits being pulled by the player interacting with the vending machine, allowing for handless mobs to be able to purchase items from a vending machine. * Finally makes the "use-for-everything buying things component" used by the most utilized component of the in-game economy, to reduce the quantity of unique implementations of purchasing things in the code. - Existing vending specific checks are retained on before handing off behavior to the payment component, for behavior such as purchasing cigarettes/alcohol under the age of 18/21. Notes: - Vending machines will lose their internal credits stored when deconstructed, as a security measure. - Vending machines will now show the total amount of credits that a mob has on their person, combining physical credits as well as credits held in their ID card to accurately portray their total wealth across the mob in question. ## Why It's Good For The Game First off, this is largely an excuse to move vending machine behavior over to the payment component for the purposes to less code copy-paste, and to try and make the implementation more wide-spread. Second, this implements a new tertiary economy method to the game, in the same design space as bounties, which serve as common methods of making money without necessarily being specific to their job in question, with the primary goal of providing small amounts of work to the crew and a basic interaction with the economy system. Additionally, it gives cargo more things they can do to assist the station, and a way to know which parts of the station need support as a result. It improves the interaction between the vending shortage station trait as well, making it a challenge with depth as opposed to a more oppressive round change that players would rather reroll the game over. Additionally, this makes a few price tweaks to vending restock modules as well to help incentivize buying some of the more minor restock kits, and a few select bumps on restocks that cover wide enough territory to necessitate fewer restocks. |
||
|
|
69138fb204 | Logs holochip credits worth zero or less credits and prevents them from spawning. (#81605) | ||
|
|
3ee9d58423 |
Post-revs win now ends the shift. (#76728)
## About The Pull Request Post revs win now ends the shift. Does some misc code cleanup of stuff that annoyed me while I was reading code. Implements revs win ending the shift via a new global used in `/datum/game_mode/proc/check_finished(force_ending)` that is set to TRUE when revs win. The rev station charter has been removed (for lack of anywhere else good to put it trivially). The bedsheet has been incorporated into the Post-Revolutionary Fervor station trait. It replaces Captain bedsheets when this station trait rolls.  **This is all untested, and I'm not sure if I'm able to test this on local. Please carefully review code changes or consider testmerging over fullmerging.** ## Why It's Good For The Game Quoting myself from https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=85&t=33860 > I have no issues with post-revs loss. It's simple, everyone knows where they stand and it works well. Please keep it. > > I have issues with post-revs win. Too complex; not intuitive; too many factions; no way to identify which faction a player belongs to ICly; difficult to administrate as a result. > >... > >Without a good code solution improving post-revs win, I would remove it while retaining current post-revs lose if such an option was available to me as headmin. > >If my quibbles with it were dealt with, I would happily vote in favour of re-introducing post-revs win. It's not an ideologicial opposition, just a practical one. This can really be summarised as: Revs refuses to end even after the revolution wins and the revolution is over. There's exiled heads, the sec team, mindshielded non-revs, non-revs, ex-revs and ex-headrevs. Generally exiled heads and the sec team buddy up as a single faction. Ex-revs and ex-headrevs are the same. But mindshielded crew and non-mindshielded crew sit in an awkward limbo, where mindshielded crew aren't anti-revs, and the non-mindshielded non-rev crew aren't rev-sided. Mindshields also do nothing about the ex-antag status. Since the simplest solution to this problem is ending on post-revs win, that's the one I've gone for. ## Changelog 🆑 del: Revolution has been reverted back to old behaviour. The round once again ends when the revolution is successful. The round continues as normal if the revolution fails. add: When the station is rolled in a state of Post-Revolutionary Fervor, the Captain will find their bedsheets replaced with an anti-Nanotrasen variant. /🆑 |
||
|
|
4ab46358c0 |
Optimizes INVOKE_ASYNC by making it a macro and avoiding a proc call (#73264)
## About The Pull Request This is quite literally the same behavior but faster, and also catches improper arguments better than the old macro/proc approach. Credit to Lohikar for writing the macro. Port of https://github.com/DaedalusDock/daedalusdock/pull/196 Also, `world.ImmediateInvokeAsync()` never set a return value, so expecting one was never valid behavior. At MSO's request, the documentation of `spawn(-1)`: As per the reference, calling `spawn()` with a negative value will execute the spawned code until a blocking action (such as `sleep()`) is encountered. Then, it will step outside of the spawned code, and continue the proc. This is the same behavior as calling a `waitfor = FALSE` proc. Specifically, under the hood, `spawn(-1)` creates a copy of the callstack like `sleep()`, incase the spawned code is blocked and needs to be rescheduled. As an added bonus, `spawn(-1)` silences SHOULD_NOT_SLEEP errors, whereas `waitfor = FALSE` does not. ## Why It's Good For The Game ITS FREE FUCKING CPU TIME --------- Co-authored-by: Mothblocks <35135081+Mothblocks@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kyle Spier-Swenson <kyleshome@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
e9351f6ae0 |
Add lints for idiomatic balloon alert usage (#72280)
Adds lints for `balloon_alert(span_xxx(...))` (which is always wrong), and balloon alert where the first letter is a capital (which is usually wrong). Fixes everything that failed them. As a reminder, abbreviations like "AI" and "GPS" shouldn't be capitalized in a balloon alert. In cases where this is intentional for flavor (there was one case), you can `UNLINT` like so: Co-authored-by: Zephyr <12817816+ZephyrTFA@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
4d6a8bc537 |
515 Compatibility (#71161)
Makes the code compatible with 515.1594+
Few simple changes and one very painful one.
Let's start with the easy:
* puts call behind `LIBCALL` define, so call_ext is properly used in 515
* Adds `NAMEOF_STATIC(_,X)` macro for nameof in static definitions since
src is now invalid there.
* Fixes tgui and devserver. From 515 onward the tmp3333{procid} cache
directory is not appened to base path in browser controls so we don't
check for it in base js and put the dev server dummy window file in
actual directory not the byond root.
* Renames the few things that had /final/ in typepath to ultimate since
final is a new keyword
And the very painful change:
`.proc/whatever` format is no longer valid, so we're replacing it with
new nameof() function. All this wrapped in three new macros.
`PROC_REF(X)`,`TYPE_PROC_REF(TYPE,X)`,`GLOBAL_PROC_REF(X)`. Global is
not actually necessary but if we get nameof that does not allow globals
it would be nice validation.
This is pretty unwieldy but there's no real alternative.
If you notice anything weird in the commits let me know because majority
was done with regex replace.
@tgstation/commit-access Since the .proc/stuff is pretty big change.
Co-authored-by: san7890 <the@san7890.com>
Co-authored-by: Mothblocks <35135081+Mothblocks@users.noreply.github.com>
|
||
|
|
04ca99d7e9 |
NT Pay app. Money send on distance, transaction log! (#70108)
* base * reasons * GetToken proc, with a many remarks * Add a way to change reason in transfer_money proc. Add a reasons. * Reason to use the app. Commission. Standard application. * Apply suggestions from code review - Tralezab Co-authored-by: tralezab <40974010+tralezab@users.noreply.github.com> * Tralezab & jlsnow301 advices. New format(everywhere) * Nanotrasen * Refactor TGUI(not me:( ). Fix useless capitalize * Update code/modules/economy/account.dm * Trans transforms in transaction * coMmission. little autodoc mistalke. Translation != Transaction * oops * Merge Conflict * ... * back feats * mistakes bye! * ну да Co-authored-by: tralezab <40974010+tralezab@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
f1a363c825 |
Converts a shitload of istypes to their more concise macros (#69260)
* Converts a lot of istypes() to use their istype macro helpers. |
||
|
|
fc4c679380 |
Fixes some improper global signal use (payment component, traitor objectives) (#69131)
* Fixes some improper signal use of SEND_GLOBAL_SIGNAL() |
||
|
|
bec3e9e950 |
Lets Admin AI Interact Print Items Again (#68958)
I added a check for ghost AIs to bypass the payment component. So j*nnies (cringe) can print items from lathes again. Useful in case I forgor the typepath of something and need to print it to remember, or to more forcefully show someone that you can print something at a lathe. |
||
|
|
2187384d36 | Fixes Drones being charged for using the Lathe on/off station (#66593) | ||
|
|
5f4d5a42d4 |
Arconomy: The bigger balance PR (REVISED EDITION) (#65795)
This PR covers 4 Key features:
Price Rebalancing
Passive Income
Gas Exports
Lathe Tax
Relevant Design Doc (Slightly out of date as a result of the discourse on the subject).
https://hackmd.io/WlWgyRafTaiAqz6ouOqC-Q
-- START DOCUMENT --
# Arconomy Version Two
This is mostly me organizing a long list of thoughts that I'm not sure if I can properly describe and get across, but lets just work with what we got and go from there.
## There should probably be a relationship to time and profit
So, part one of a series called "Arcane was completely wrong about game design", I made a rather large misstep in regards to designing arconomy, and nobody told me this until far, FAR after I had gone way too in on my own ideas:
"There needs to be a relationship between time and money". Because Space Station 13 is a game that is built around rounds, either long, LONG rounds on MRP or 30 min - 1 hour long rounds in LRP, your whole orientation of the game is built around time. The longer you spend in a single round, the more you can do and mold the station and the game in a specific direction, whether it's from an admin event, doing your job, or going off on a wierd character based tangent.
The issue here lies in a question I tried to answer in my previous design doc:
> "Command players start with lots of money, and make mountains of money, and as a result, have so much money by the end of the shift that they're practically immune to the effects of the economy.
> Assistant players start out with practically no money, find that the station is covered in costs that they'll never be able to practically afford, and decide that the economy is stupid and not worth utilizing altogether."
Two fundimentally different outlooks on the same problem, caused by the pay discrepency as it existed originally. Since we have so many different jobs all at different paygrades, the option that made the most sense at the time was to completely remove paychecks alltogether because they would multiplicitively exacerbate the previous issue.
While it would flood the in-game economy over time at high levels, it did add a sense of timescale to the existing in-game relationships. You **KNEW** that after x many minutes you would get that fancy hat, or that you would need to find cash in other ways to get it. Having that time-scale is helpful as we've moved to our 90 minute round average/goal. It also, similarly, means that we know exactly how many credits each job SHOULD have had access to before a major disaster calls for a shuttle call. But, in hindsight, that is a value that should be consistant for all players. If a single, unaided player looks at a 200 credit bill, that should have the same impact player to player, and not limit their access to jobs.
## Bounties just ain't that fun, but they stand to see improvement from where they are now
So, guilty as charged, bounty running doesn't quite have the same charm as it used to have. For our friends just joining us, cargo used to have a single, per round laundry list of items that would payout to the cargo budget each shift. Each list would start with 10 items, one of which would randomly be assigned higher priority with a higher payout, and it would be cargo's job to ~~Break into each department and steal that thing~~ cooperate with jobs around the station to aquire funds for station crisis or when you just want to dick around and make stacks of cash. This had a distinct charm to it, but one element of it that majorly reduced the replayability of bounties was that they were severely limited in scope. Once you did your ONE drink bounty or your ONE chemical bounty, you no longer needed to interact with that department.
My original goal was this: Make an unlimited bounty system, where crewmates were able to get a cut of their work as profit. To a degree, it's fairly successful! Crew do have a way to actively work with cargo to get paid for their labor, and they help cargo as a result by giving them free valuables. The issue lies in the fact that this has kinda flipped the relationship on it's head: Bounties stopped being cargo's job to outsource to the crew, and instead the crew's job that becomes dependent on cargo.
In general, many bounties simply weren't meant to be repeatable content in the first place. And certainly not meant to be used for every job. Offloading it as a kind of fetchquest minigame so that all jobs can offset the loss of passive income? It's not the best choice. For jobs like botanists or scientists it's tolerable at best, frustrating at worst. Just look at the state of things like experisci-slime experiments or scanning furniture.
It gets far worse when it's from the perspective of jobs that have *explicitly* limited supplies like security. No, a security player is not going to be allowed to haul away all the good metal handcuffs from the brig for a bounty, and no, you cannot take all the riot shotguns from the brig.
Now, a few of these things were fixed over time, with mixed successes. Bounties started to be cleaned up in order to prevent limited quantity items from being an option for repeat bounties. Jobs that lack exports started to get some content for still allowing them to have repeatable exports (Like the Scanners for Security Officers to go on patrols).
The BIG EXCEPTION to this is Restaurant Bots, but we'll hit that in a second.
## Getting everything on the same price scale has been a major improvement.
Unironically one of the best changes made has been the idea that even if we lack that good time-credit scale from before, we didn't really have a "standard" to work off of when something new is added to the game and the dev needs to determine how much to make that thing cost. That's why the current costs of objects and values on-station are scaled off of a single define, the value of a crate sold on the cargo shuttle.
> Yes, I'd like an APPLE. It's worth 3124151 CREDITS. NO, I don't know why the apple juice in the vendor is worth 415 CREDITS, nor do I CARE, GOOD MAN.
From the back end, everything is scaled off the same define now. Paygrades are defined off of a different scale still, but that's fine. You know, from the cargo end of things, that a cargo player needs to ship off X number of empty metal crates to purchase a laser crate, or a pizza crate. Definate relationships help in solidifying the singular value of a product.
If we decide that we want to rescale the in-game economy and provide space credits with more granularity, at least we know we can do it with a single line of code, and not looking at every single instance of something that charges the player money.
### Arconomy Tangent: We gotta nuke gas selling.
This has been a long time coming and I know people are going to be upset at me, but look man.
I have no idea how selling moles of gas works these days. It seems like with minimal resources, true atmos wizards are able to make singular cans of gasses with infinite moles of some kind of gas, and if it's exotic enough, they can make upwards of a million credits a can. I've seen multiple occasions where selling gas cans to cargo has allowed for players to buy a bike.
For our Gen-Z zoomers reading this, players were never meant to BUY the bike. The bike is just a reskinned scooter meant as a cute little pokemon joke. If a player can actually buy a bike in a round, that's a sign that someone, somewhere, fucked up.
We fucked up the whole system with atmos gas selling.
We've now gone through metas of extracting miasma from lavaland for credits, we've gone through a meta where cargo starts building their own hydrogen burn chambers for simply produced gasses, we've seen time and time again that processed gasses in the funny space simulator just tends to be abused to death and back. I've had talks with TheFinalPotato on this in the past, and it just feels like a system that would need to be rewritten from the ground up, or looked at in terms of the whole cargo department. If I don't get to it first, the next cargo design doc someone writes **SHOULD**.
## Giving jobs content that integrates into the economy can be really fun.
Tourism bots and the baked in ingredient shopping is fun! It's enabled for a fluff job that doesn't have too terribly much by way of serious responsibilites to integrate active income minigames into the gameplay of chefs and bartenders. It's fully optional, it's quick, and it's not even a full shift investment.
These secondary tasks, which utilize jobs core gameplay loops in a new way, while rewarding them within the in-game economy are a decent way to keep players engaged with their jobs, and allow for them to use credits as a player resource as well as a primary job resource.
**I AM NOT SAYING** that all jobs need to find tasks to arbitrarily reward players with credits for. The reason it works so well for jobs like the chef or bartender is because their job is already to make food and drinks, but they have so many options that they're not encouraged to make too wide of a variety of food, especially when botanists won't always make everything you need. The food market gives them an outlet to buy outlier ingredients and the tourists pay handsomely enough that you can offset your costs most or the time.
I'll break this down as well into the three different methods of money-making in game as well, to guide someone on how to make good, secondary income content.
| Primary | Secondary | Tertiary |
| -------- | -------- | -------- |
| This is something like passive paycheck income. You get this just purely for playing the game, and staying alive. | This is an active trade off between your job's specific content, where you are trading your time for something it is directly your responsibility to do. Eg. Tourist Bots. | An active task you are performing for income, but lacks the specialization of a job. EG. Bounties. |
Jobs that excell at more service based tasks and less production based tasks should aim to aquire more seconary style economy integration, like medical, science, or security.
## The options for moving money around the station are actually pretty decent, but could be streamlined
Bounty boards are pretty decent at being a way to pay crew members for single service jobs. However, bounty boards are pretty much dead content, in a sense. There's not much incentive to hunt down your department's bounty board.
Similarly, most crew would just prefer to hand credits out by hand to prevent most kinds of abuse of their own credit supply.
Long term and certainly a major personal outcome I'd like to see: Bounty boards and Newscasters should be merged together. Newscasters have some truely awful spaghetti and their being held together by shoe-strings and duct tape (This is slang for HTML). Bounty boards are... well they're functional, but they have the benefit of being built in TGUI. Merging the two's functions should cut down on wall-space, as well as improve the quality of a vast deal of code, and make money transfer on station slightly easier.
Honestly, pretty happy with vend-a-trays. They're pretty decent store-machines on station and do their job pretty well when they get used. All in all I'm happy with how they work.
Custom Vendors are clunky to a fairly major degree and I don't think most players get how to make them work on account of need a price tagger (not a sales tagger, that's the cargo item) to mark an object for it's sale value, then load it into a custom vendor sales unit, then load it into a custom vending machine, and that's only IF custom vending machines decide to work this year. Streamlining the tools, or perhaps just vending machines would certainly improve this as a service.
## Just ain't enough cool stuff to buy with credits.
An ever-present problem, that we're just kinda stuck with. There's a decent number of issues involved with making content that can safely be gated with just credits.
* If it's usable as a weapon, is it too dangerous to hand out to the crew at large?
* Does security get potential oversight?
* If it's illegal, does it go through cargo?
* Does it HAVE to go through cargo?
* If it's beneficial, is it going to invalidate the existance of a job? (Think old medkits!)
* Is there anything that players WANT that's not a weapon, benefical to the station but not too strong, or quite literally traitor equipment?
It's a tough question.
Some items make complete sense to implement on a per job basis as either uncommon or premium equipment, while other items could potentially be moved to station-wide unique purchasables.
# Takeaways:
Look, these are just some possible solutions that I'm considering. I think that working alongside a maintainer who could actually give a damn on getting this system orderly and possibly alligned with our current design philosophy (Who also understands that a not-insignificant amount of current economy was abitrarly written by goofball an actual decade ago) could help iron this out into a clear and consise set of goals and milestones to make the in-game economy workable. Not balanced, but workable.
* **Design a simple simulation for per round intake and outtake, to determine benchmark values for a 90 minute round.**

It would need to look something like this, as a kind of fucked up, Multi-Input Multi-Output Control Problem. Possibly could be done in simulink, but I'm not quite sure how to do that at this moment, so a less complex version might be fine.
* **Look back at implementing crewmember incomes, but at a flat, more consistant rate over all jobs**
My leading idea: 50 credit, uniform paygrade. No wild, unscaled pay rates based on what job is "important" or not.
That line of thinking means that certain jobs should have more expensive equipment over other jobs, but then we're right back to the captain thinking that a cup of coffee is practically free where an assistant thinks that a screwdriver from the vendor is going to put them out of house and home.
Improves time-relationship values with credits.
This could lead way to heads of staff having some degree of control to giving raises or paycuts to crew-members, but perhaps at a very, VERY gradual rate.
* **Perform another big-picture look at bounty cubes.**
Potentially try to put bounties back in the hands of cargo, while still providing payouts to crewmates who assist in completing jobs. This may require some minor refactoring of the pricetag component, perhaps to even allow for multiple crewmembers to recieve profit from a payout.
This means once again, look at making bounties workable for all jobs on the station, not making the objects requested literal lathe-fodder, and finding ways to benefit the station in some way with the task of bounty cubes, even if it's just for credits.
Deceptively hard task.
* **Add secondary tasks that integrate the economy into non-bounty-able jobs/departments**
Like it says on the tin, look into ways to add content that improves economy integration into existing jobs, without necessarily changing what those jobs DO. The bounties for those jobs can still exist as a tertiary thing, but should be made clear that they're... tertiary.
Chefs still make food and bartenders still serve drinks, but they have a way to hand them out for fun and profit.
Some thoughts and ways to handle this potentially:
*Science:* Perform intricate testing on anomalous materials using science equipment. Should NOT REWARD RESEARCH POINTS. Mr. OJ Headcoder will CHEMICALLY CASTRATE me, or you, if you do.
*Medical:* Complete tricky or non-standard surgeries on dummies for medical data. Think like that meme from the TV show, House.
"He needs Mouse bites to live. MORE MOUSE BITES."
*Engineering:* Repair wacky machines that use both station-standard parts as well as solving quick puzzles.
* **Look into more effective money sinks that are dynamic sensitive**
Think, for example, about the station ransom event that spawns space pirates.
What if instead of the captain just dumping credits from the cargo budget into the aether to prevent pirate spawns (They're bugged anyway to my knowledge to spawn anyway), crewmates had to cough up that dough before a time-limit, or risk a pirate spawn. For those of you who were scratching their heads at (Operational Costs!?) in the above controls diagram, this is the sort of thing I mean.
Little, smaller things that might need to be purchased, invested in, or otherwise drain credits from the station over the course of the round.
# Arconomy 2.0: Smarter, Better, Flashier.
## Roundstart
Players begin each shift with a set amount of money, with the value being mostly uniform over the course of a shift assuming no interaction with economy. Jobs are split up into only 3 paygrades, Minimal, Crew, and Command. Minimal is reserved for jobs that are meant to fill population counts but lack a specialization, like prisoner and assistant. When starting the shift, a player will start with 5 paychecks worth of savings. This system is not designed for persistance, so you will always be able to tell how much money a player starts out with. Every 5 minutes, aka every economy tick, the player will recieve one paycheck, which is capped out at the standard crew member paycheck. This means that even if you start the shift as the captain, and begin the shift with 500 credits, you will recieve the same 50 credits as regular crew members.
| Minimal Paycheck | Crew Paycheck | Command Paycheck | Frequency |
| -------- | -------- | -------- |--------|
| 125 Cr | 250 Cr | 500 Cr | Roundstart |
| 25 Cr | 50 Cr | 50 Cr | Passive Income |
## Product Prices
Products found in vending machines are defined by the amount of a player's paycheck they're meant to cost. Regular items use the PAYCHECK_CREW value, while more expensive or otherwise prohibitive items are defined by PAYCHECK_COMMAND. Items are defined in this uniform, horizontal fashion in order to maintain the equal value of credits over all jobs. A 100 credit medkit in medical should have the same value to a doctor as it does to a botanist.
Jobs apply a discount to vending within their own department, so an engineering would have a discount on tools, and a doctor would have a discount on sutures. Items that are important to gameplay progression in a role are less expensive to their intended users.
> **AUTHORS NOTE:** I am considering removing in-department discounts. In the benefit of making the value of purchasables more universal, deciding that credits shouldn't be spent within their own department just seems... rather fucking stupid.
> Possibly move the discount to only the first few minutes of the shift, or perhaps as some kind of gameplay benefit to slowly increase in-department discount through gameplay milestones? Who knows 👻
>
Some jobs have premium, high value items stocked in their vending machines that are not meant to be purchased at roundstart. These are meant to encourage players to save or combine resources to gain access. An example of this is insulated gloves. Other high value items can also be found in contraband through hacking vending machines. This remains unchanged.
## Markets
The cargo department has been changed in order to improve player involvement with the economy, as well as to give cargo more variety in their merchandise while preventing a singular stale meta of products to purchase from.
Yes, I'm looking at you, russian surplus crate.
Lets start with what's remaining the same:
* Cargo is a department that manages imports and exports of products, fulfilling departmental orders, and aquiring supplies dependent on the station's state.
* Cargo encompasses the station's mail, mining, and flow of orders, as well as drone exploration.
* A skilled cargo member is able to find high value items to sell back to centcom in exchange for more funds, to purchase those supplies.
* Centcom may request bounties which crew can fulfill in exchange for credits, if they wish for additional work.
**Now for the new design flow:**
Cargo starts out with a new mechanic called a market. Markets hold existing export datums as well as purchasable products. The values of items will fluxuate up and down based on the market status, with in-game events or player actions raising or lowering the values of specific markets.
At roundstart, cargo has a single market to sell to, which is Nanotransen. This will not incapsulate all the existing export datums in the game, just the *primary* exports that are used by players. Items that are exclusive to nanotrasen and required to play certain game modes, like mindshield implants or being able to sell crates, are included and will always be available to purchase.
Additional markets can be unlocked through gameplay sources, such as:
| Market Name | Source | Imports/Exports |
| -------- | -------- |- |
| The Syndicate | Emagging/Hacking the Console | Illegal Goods/Contraband |
| The Clown Planet Commerse | Discovering the clown planet ruin | Pies, Horns, Pranking Equipment |
|Terragov Sector Security Surplus | Killing any megafauna. | Weapons, Ammunition, Advanced Riot Gear. |
| Mekki Materials Co. | Recovered loot from Exodrones | Materials and industrial equipment. |
|Donk Co.| As a tip from tourist robots. | Foods and Drinks, Toys and Games.|
|Waffle Co.| As above. | Bootleg products and wacky merchandise. |
|The Research Consortium| Reward for completing any experiment tree. | Slime Cores, RnD Artifacts, Robotics Equipment |
...And more, if I can think of more.
The purpose being, of course, to split up cargo's purchasable goods to be more instanced and unique, while also create unique situations where due to profitable markets, very specific exports are needed to help the department make money.
End of document for now :@ArcaneMusic
-- END DOCUMENT
Price Shifting
So, in-game items that have prices have a major issue on their hands, being that they were decided by how much money that job should make. This means that many of the jobs in-game have been given prices scaled to their job's income. That income I adjusted by removing passive income in #54161. While this was helpful to moving towards an active in-game economy, it resulted in items falling into distinct price brackets. A high paying job like security's items could never be purchased by someone like a botanist, but a job like a security officer had more capital and buying power than most other jobs in-game combined when moving down those brackets. We've done a simple normalization of scale to help in bring things closer to a semblance of equality.
There are now 3 price brackets, PAYCHECK_LOW, PAYCHECK_CREW, and PAYCHECK_COMMAND. Command staff will still have a higher base level of money on-hand than other crew, and low paying wages that we on-station don't respect as being real jobs (assistant, prisoner) will have their items be intentionally cheaper to encourage active participation in the economy, but the difference in scale is now noticeably far closer to each other. This means that assistants can still interact with the economy as spenders, but if they want to be doing a lot of work with money, they'll need to put in work. Additionally, this means we arbitrarily enforce a system that allows for items to have uniformity in what they cost to other players. 50 credits for a wrench feels better when you know that other job critical items in-game are also around the same price, and it's equivalent to one paycheck.
Paychecks are reintroduced
Economy lost it's relationship to time. In a game where a single round takes 90+ minutes (Backed up not only by the head-coder's design direction as well as plenty of aggregate round data), having a relationship to time and how long it takes to afford something is a major consideration when you look at buying something. Also, we get to say that I was certifiably wrong in regards to the active economy thing, since we have very, VERY few active sources of content in-game that are very... fun? Bounties are literal fetch quests but something like tourists is at least more engaging and interactive with the round, and should be the direction we want economy-job integration to head in.
Between having inflation as a price manipulation mechanic already in the code, as well as prices being roughly equalized in terms of their costs between jobs and their impact on the round, this allows for the reintroduction of paychecks to an extent.
As an additional note, doing this meant tweaking down the syndicate briefcase of cash, so that instead of giving you 5000 credits for 1 TC, it now costs 5 TC to accompany the fact that this is now a rather significant amount of money, even on decently high population. Fun fact: the Syndicate Briefcase of Cash actually PREDATES the economy, and was NEVER ADJUSTED beyond the original implementation of the economy as a result!
Gas Exports.
ALRIGHT ARE YOU READY FOR SOME GRAPHS? I THOUGHT SO, YOU LOVE GRAPHS.
So, gas exports are fucked, have always been fucked, and consistently have proven to be capable of breaking the in-game economy for a long time. This is no secret, I've been pinged with players getting billions, actual billions of credits using it multiple times in as many years. See, any round where a player manages to buy the bicycle is a round where I've fucked up, or someone fucked and I let it get past me.
So here's how gas exports work right now.
So, all of this hinges on the value of a single mole of gas, and some gasses enable you to make extremely, EXTREMELY profitable gasses through atmospheric gas wizardry However, even those less profitable gasses are still in an extremely high magnitude of value.
Most gasses if you have a full can of it will net you OVER 10k credits. For scale, one crate being sold in cargo is 200 credits.
That's a minimum of crates for pumping gas into a hollow metal box and praying it doesn't explode.
So we adjusted the values accordingly.
The baseline value of a single gas has been tweaked downward significantly. Even these values are still arguably very high, but I can play with it at the discretion of LemonintheDark. The green line at the top represents gasses that previously sold for 100 credits per mole, antinobilium I believe, and working downwards. I am going to try and enforce 10 credits per mole as the absolute maximum hard cap on gas exports, regardless of how many gasses we try to add in the future. Because the alternative is getting a gunjillion credits by huffing miasma into a tank of steel. And we ain't having that shit.
Lathe Tax
Part of the testing for this PR involved me modeling the SS13 economy in a given round as a kind of controls problem, with each source of income introduced in the round as a kind of input (Passive Income, Bounties, Tourists) in order to get a handle on roughly how much income a single round of SS13 will see per player on the given designed round-length, in order to estimate how much things are going to cost. Modeling how much players spend on a given round is variable enough that it'd be too difficult to accurately test without just throwing this up on a server and getting live data.
However, from the appearance of my dataset, players would be making a LOT more money nowadays with all of the above changes implemented. In an attempt to curve that intake, I attempted to implement a small, low scale tax of printing items that would take a small amount of players income every time they print, as a way to add a basic economic side-effect to this mechanic.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a mixed decision. So, maintainers came up with an intended direction they want to see it, as they wanted to make sure that economy would remain a secondary system, that could still have an impact on round direction and the changes they want to see in the game.
So, here's the intent:
Lathe tax should exist in the form of printing things from protolathes outside of your department, not on autolathes or your own protolathe.
We want to promote people talking and collaborating to access things if it's outside the scope of their department and they still want it, with theft still being a viable avenue of gameplay.
Players will be charged 10 credits for printing a set of items not from their own protolathe, each. Printing an item can be paid for from your own ID card's bank account automatically, but the payment component has been buffed to handle physical money alternatives, as well as pulled money, similar to the luxury shuttle scanner gate's behavior.
Borgs are still enabled to print from lathes, however instead of it costing them credits, they now take a self-significant power cost in order to do so, preventing them from being used as a roving bank account for printing. I'll look into this further as we don't want to invalidate mechanics like borgs being able to do organ based surgery or building machinery, but we don't want them to become credit cards, so place that under advisement.
Tweaks and Updates:
(Suggested by Ziiro) If the revolutionaries win, centcom will no longer enforce the Lathe Tax.
(Suggested by about ~1000 people independently between my DMs, Reddit threads, the Feedback Thread, and elsewhere)
Printing items only taxes you once per print. EG: If you print 10 Kitchen Knifes as an assistant from the service lathe, you will only be charged once instead of 10 times.
For many of the reasons that I outlined above, this is a good change in a positive direction.
Players get more ability to interact with the economy without having to do content that's becoming increasingly depreciated in my absence.
Players also have a baseline consensus on what values of credits are high and low because jobs have been given an equalized standard in regards to the cost of certain items.
Price fluctuations through inflation will now be more meaningful in situations where the economy becomes more relevant.
The system will still encourage you to play a job that's productive to the status of the station through lower paycheck jobs existing as well.
Gas exports are now reduced to the point that their value is appropriate for the first time... actually ever. Nice.
The values of nearly every item purchasable by players has been rebalanced.
Players will now start with less starting money, but will receive a paycheck once every 5 minutes.
The value of gasses exported through the cargo department have been skewed way, WAY down in terms of price.
The Syndicate briefcase of cash now contains now costs 5 TC, up from 1 TC, for 5000 credits.
Printing items from lathes on station now costs a fee of 10 credits per item printed if it's from a lathe not under your department.
The payment component has received additional handling for physical credits, as well as pulled credits/ID cards for those without hands.
|
||
|
|
6ad8000bd3 |
Adds the Accounting Console to the game (HOP Job Content) (#66304)
This PR adds the accounting console to the game, as a console that exists round start within the HOP's office. The accounting console allows for players to get 2 separate lists of information: - A list of all the bank accounts associated with each crewmember on the station, listing their account balance, their job, and their paygrade modifier (Which is either 1 or 0.7, depending on their species) - The audit log, a basic list of transactions of player purchases, listed listed in the following formal universally: [person] spent [cost]CR on [Purchase Source]. It's intentionally left without all the information so that players will need to investigate if they notice strange purchases coming from an account, as a kind of ghetto money forensics. |
||
|
|
375a20e49b |
Refactors most spans into span procs (#59645)
Converts most spans into span procs. Mostly used regex for this and sorted out any compile time errors afterwards so there could be some bugs. Was initially going to do defines, but ninja said to make it into a proc, and if there's any overhead, they can easily be changed to defines. Makes it easier to control the formatting and prevents typos when creating spans as it'll runtime if you misspell instead of silently failing. Reduces the code you need to write when writing spans, as you don't need to close the span as that's automatically handled by the proc. (Note from Lemon: This should be converted to defines once we update the minimum version to 514. Didn't do it now because byond pain and such) |
||
|
|
0aebd86c44 | fix missing payment (#57608) | ||
|
|
e09a9032da |
Crates and bountes are now defined by crate's value and paygrades. Civilian bounty payout is higher and uncheesable. (#55413)
Does a value-wise refactor of crates and bounties in order to scale the value of these imports and exports to the value of crate exports (500 credits each). Then, I have adjusted the value of crate exports to 200 credits down from 500 to place the most standard unit of profit within cargo to a scale within that of roundstart paygrades currently on station. (350-1400 credits). This effectively balances one of the biggest disparities left within the in-game economy, which is that cargo's price scales have really never been re-balanced with the considerations of on station prices, and have been still to the same scale as when they were based on cargo points 3 years ago. While admittedly some prices in vendors were scale to those original cargo values, so many of them weren't that it warranted a massive rebalance PR in order to places the scale of these items within an appropriate range of their intended user's cost values. |
||
|
|
0eaab0bc54 |
Grep for space indentation (#54850)
#54604 atomizing Since a lot of the space indents are in lists ill atomize those later |
||
|
|
a74714c2ab | Moved these getters toward the upper end. | ||
|
|
45c14f6330 |
Adds SIGNAL_HANDLER and SIGNAL_HANDLER_DOES_SLEEP to prevent signal callbacks from blocking (#52761)
Adds SIGNAL_HANDLER, a macro that sets SHOULD_NOT_SLEEP(TRUE). This should ideally be required on all new signal callbacks. Adds BLOCKING_SIGNAL_HANDLER, a macro that does nothing except symbolize "this is an older signal that didn't necessitate a code rewrite". It should not be allowed for new work. This comes from discussion around #52735, which yields by calling input, and (though it sets the return type beforehand) will not properly return the flag to prevent attack from slapping. To fix 60% of the yielding cases, WrapAdminProcCall no longer waits for another admin's proc call to finish. I'm not an admin, so I don't know how many behinds this has saved, but if this is problematic for admins I can just make it so that it lets you do it anyway. I'm not sure what the point of this babysitting was anyway. Requested by @optimumtact. Changelog cl admin: Calling a proc while another admin is calling one will no longer wait for the first to finish. You will simply just have to call it again. /cl |
||
|
|
19c3bbde31 |
Cleanup up all instances of using var/ definitions in proc parameters. (#52728)
* var/list cleanup * The rest of the owl * plushvar bad * Can't follow my own advice. |
||
|
|
911e702540 |
Adds a simple payment component, photocopiers now cost 5 credits to make copies each. (#51944)
* Take 1, initial mediocity * Stonks * I'm working on it don't stale me * HOOOOOOO adjusts the photocopier, extends component functionality to the medical kiosk, etc etc/ * Fixes that one bug with printers. * Removes an unused var. * Makes defines * I am a champion * Moves econ defines over... econ defines. * Forgot the comment. * How about now? * Accidently excluded payments from the dme. * Slight text tweaks, also checkmark. * updates economy defines. * Apply suggestions from code review Review Commits pre-cleanup Co-authored-by: Rohesie <rohesie@gmail.com> * Post-Fixes from review. Co-authored-by: Rohesie <rohesie@gmail.com> |