## About The Pull Request
Turns the surface z-level of icebox into a 1x3 area, effectively adding
2 wilderness new z-levels surrounding the station
Because it's not always clear to other people what I'm talking about,
this is what I mean with making the surface level a 3x3 z-level
The wilderness z-levels are gridlinked, instead of crosslinked, which
just means the connections are consistent and not randomized. If you
keep going right, you will always end up where you started again,
eventually. This also removes the black border around the surface icebox
z-level (cause you can just go there now)
**Wilderness levels**
I've added some Z-level templates that can be generated. They're
incredibly basic, but all can spawn runes on them as well.
- Snow planes (5x)
- Ice planes (1x)
- Forest planes (1x)
- Mountain planes (1x)
I've also tweaked surface generation quite a bit. It being completely
covered in bones always felt weird, and the intersparsed rocks and
chasms never sat right with me. The default overworldgen is now more
like the Forested trait, but with more sparse trees.
All of this is modular btw. You can increase the amount of z-levels,
make any space z-level be unrandomized gridlinked or add your own
wilderness z-levels (either to your own map or icebox)
## Why It's Good For The Game
Icebox exploration is kind of depressing. We have this unique setting,
but we can't really go anywhere? You can go down and find that one pool,
which is about the peak of exploration of icebox.
Now you can literally explore the entire round and get incredibly lost!
It's also a great opportunity for mappers! (Especially since the
templates I made were made rather quickly as I wasn't sure if this had
merit).
2 extra z-levels isn't a lot, but it'll let us further develop planetary
wilderness z-levels further without impacting load times that much.
Maybe 3x3 icebox can be real in the future, but for now 1x3 icebox will
have to do
## About The Pull Request
The sequel to https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/89234
> someone should do the rest at some point
guess what, I'm that someone :3
## Why It's Good For The Game
Same reasoning as the previous PR:
> less cluttered code is nice, and it should in theory be more optimized
as we avoid the need to run min, max, and locate.
## Changelog
No user-facing changes
## About The Pull Request
All usages of world.icon_size in code have been replaced with new
`ICONSIZE_X`, `ICONSIZE_Y` and `ICONSIZE_ALL` defines depending on
context
Replaces some "32" magic numbers with the defines
A few bits of code have been modified to split up x/y math as well
## Why It's Good For The Game
Magic number bad, code more readable, code more flexible and I'm told
there's an access cost to doing world.icon_size so minor performance
gains
## Changelog
🆑 tonty
code: made some code relating to the world's icon size more readable
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: Ghom <42542238+Ghommie@users.noreply.github.com>
Alexis