## About The Pull Request
When a camera update is triggered, it is instead added to a queue on a
background subsystem
An AI entering a camera chunk which is queued to update will force the
update immediately (bypassing the queue)
While the root problem of this is, ultimately, not addressed...
<img width="554" height="58"
alt="467828777-eff3f0e5-49d6-4997-b4d7-05eff6432155"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c2d6a5f5-d958-463e-959f-116bd0dab475"
/>
...the change will ultimately prevent update spam from consuming all of
the server's resources - instead allocating updates to the backburner in
times of high server stress (or on multi-z maps)
## Changelog
🆑 Melbert
refactor: Refactored the way camera updates are handled to hopefully
reduce some lag. Report any oddities
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Moves a lot of the unique renaming implementations described in #82664
to the functions given by the `obj_flag` `UNIQUE_RENAME`.
`UNIQUE_RENAME` has been given new properties to account for
non-standard renaming, these being the `RENAME_NO_DESC` flag that
prevents changing the description, the `nameformat()` and `descformat()`
procs that, when modified, allow for applying naming formats(i.e. "Body
Bag - [input]"), as well as other post-renaming handling such as
changing the name of the output plant of a renamed seed, the
`rename_checks()` proc that allows for unique naming prevention(such as
a locked personal closet), and the `rename_reset()` proc to clean up
other possible renamed variables potentially changed in `nameformat()`
and `descformat()`.
This also adds `/datum/element/tool_renaming` to crayons, which will let
them rename anything that has `UNIQUE_RENAME`. I looked through
everything with that flag, and I didn't see anything that I don't think
should be renameable by a crayon(except things that shouldn't be
renamable with pens), so it shouldn't fuck anything up.
## Why It's Good For The Game
moves all of the non-honorable mentions in #82664 to the same renaming
system, and also moves all of the honorable mentions save for:
- plaques, as they only get renamed once and wouldn't benefit from
`UNIQUE_RENAME` imo
- books, because they're far more than just renaming, and are persistent
- paintings, because they're persistent
- photos, because they're not normal renaming and they're persistent
- endoskeletons, because they're done with a multitool in UI
- cardboard IDs, because they're far more than just renaming
Additionally, this fixes:
- Implanter renaming didn't work because a ! was missing
- Clown borg picket sign renaming didn't work because they didn't use
the correct arguments
This'll make it easier to make renameable objects in the future, as
well.
## Changelog
🆑
fix: fixes implanter renaming not working
fix: fixes clownborg picket sign renaming not working
code: brought most unique renaming implementations under UNIQUE_RENAME
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This fixes custom materials not appearing for things like structures. It
also adds a bunch of new tags:
- bomb-proof
- flammable
- holograhic
- ~~unpaintable~~
- ~~supermatter proof~~
- ~~recolorable~~
- crush-proof
- conductive
Also use hyphens for multi-word examine tags.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Better UX
## Changelog
🆑
qol: Add several new examine categories for objects descs that include:
bomb-proof, flammable, holograhic, crush-proof, and conductive. Also use
hyphens for multi-word examine tags.
fix: Fixes custom materials not appearing for things like structures
when examined.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
moves all implementations (im aware of) for "Im a parent type dont spawn
me please" to the datum layer to standardized behavior
adds a standerized proc for filtering out "bad" items that we dont want
spawning. applies to it the subtype vendor, gifts, and a new spawner and
mystery box for a random gun (neither playerfacing)
"port" of https://github.com/shiptest-ss13/Shiptest/pull/4621https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22f6f0b2-b44e-411a-b3dc-6b97dc0287aa
small warning: I dont have EVERY abstract type defined right now but,
ive done a good enough job for now. Im tired of data entry rn
## Why It's Good For The Game
standardizing behavior. Might be a micro hit to performance however
having this lets us not rely on icon state to determine whether
something is a parent type and makes it much easier to tell something is
a parent type (could be applied further to things like admin spawning
menus and things like that).
need feedback on if this is actually good for the game.
## Changelog
🆑
add: Soda cans show up in the silver slime drink table.
add: Examine tag for items that are not mean to show up ingame.
refactor: Standardizes how gifts rule out abstract types.
fix: gifts no longer check if something has an inhand, massively
expanding the list of potential items.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This is a big one so please bear with me, wounds are complicated
### Max Potential Wound Rolls
We've decreased the max contributed damage to wound rolls from 35 to 25.
This results, after the exponent, a max possible wound roll of 1 to 91
before any modifiers (assuming the attack, after armor, is 25 or above).
The minimum value to wound is still 5.
### Wound Escalation Penalties
Most wounds were contributing significant numbers per wound type to the
potential for a new wound to occur. Getting wounded once meant you were
getting wound a lot, but actually getting past that first wounding may
be the tricky part.
We have significantly reigned in the wound penalty that having a wound
contributes, and instead utilize the series wound penalty to allow same
type wounds to escalate themselves faster as a priority. Having wounds
still makes you more wound vulnerable, just not to such an extreme
degree.
The priority here for what wounds matter most for contributing to
overall wounding vulnerability is ``Infected BURNS > BURNS >
SLASH|PIERCE > BLUNT.``
### Wound Armor
Wound armor, unlike all other kinds of armor, was used as a additive
value to the wound roll modifiers rather than a multiplicative value.
We have reworked how wound armor is determined by changing how wound
modifiers are calculated.
Firstly, we're passing our entire injury roll into the
``check_woundings_mod()`` proc, as we're not treating this as a proc
that just adds values anymore.
Secondly, bare wound bonus only applies if there is no potential wound
protection from any source, as expected. But it comes last in the
calculations.
Thirdly, wound protection is applied to the injury roll last, after
wound bonuses from the attack, wound bonuses from other wounds and wound
bonuses from a disabled limb are applied. This does not include serial
wound bonuses, which are determined outside of this proc.
Wound protection comes from two sources. Clothing and limb wound
resistance. Your chest and head have an amount of wound resistance so
long as they are not mangled in any fashion. Being mangled means having
either a hairline fracture or a weeping avulsion wound.
Wound protection reduces the final injury roll by a percentage. Say our
roll is 50, and we have effectively 50% wound protection. The final roll
would be 25.
### ~~Wound Armor on Clothing~~ Reverted
~~Most clothing have had their wound armor values changed. As a loose
rule, I used the highest of melee or bomb armor, except where that value
was 100, in which case I used the lowest instead. I'm basing this
decision on how embeds are calculated, which is attack type agnostic.~~
~~Some armor have inconsistent values because they are alternative
armors to an existing armor type or are hyperspecialized armor.
Ablative, bulletproof and security vests all share a value of 35,
despite the former two not having decent melee or bomb armor.~~
~~Some clothing missing wound armor that should have had them now have
wound armor.~~
~~This may need a bit of scrutiny in case one or two seem weirdly high.
Some have maybe become too low. Its a bit hard to say.~~
### The ``bare_wound_bonus`` variable
I changed it to ``exposed_wound_bonus`` to better represent when it
applies. You can be naked and still not be affected by this bonus if the
limb has wound resistance.
## Why It's Good For The Game
I'm not promising anything with this PR, but this is an attempt to
sanity check the values on wounds so that we're not seeing what the data
that determined the removal of beheading presented. An extreme
over-representation of tier 3 wounds. ~~And, from that, maybe I can
argue for beheadings coming back. That's my goal. I think beheadings
happened so much because the numbers were in need of work.~~ Well okay I
just wanna make wounds a bit more workable actually more than I want
beheadings.
Why is it that tier 3 wounds were so over-represented? Because wounds
will often force more severe wounds of other types by merit of any
wounds existing at all on a limb. Having **_a_** wound makes you more
wound prone for any kind of wound, and not just making you more likely
to suffer a more severe type of the same wound.
The threshold mechanic was intended to simulate making a wound worse,
but oddly just made a limb broadly more prone to getting worse from any
kind of attack to such a degree that future wound rolls of different
types were often going to start at the threshold necessary to be a tier
3 wound.
Dismemberment, mind you, requires you to suffer a flesh wound while you
have a bone wound of tier 2 or higher (with tier 3 giving a bonus to
this). You can do this readily via just a sharp weapon, because having a
mangled limb causes the wound to turn into a bone wound. Technically,
this is meant to be less likely as the effective damage for this wound
is halved. But the wound bonus from having a flesh wound was almost
always significant enough to kick your new bone wound up to a tier 3.
In other words; its not surprising that you saw so many beheadings,
because the system wanted to behead you as fast as it possibly can
thanks to all these escalating values.
Wound armor was only applied as a flat reduction on the roll. The
average for wound armor was 10. After receiving a single wound, you can
expect wound rolls to reach upwards of 100, even if the actual damage
roll was not particularly high, due to wound stacking bonuses form being
wounded.
This meant that wounds, if they happened, came thick and fast after the
first, regardless of what your protection might be to wounds. It was
just a matter of getting past the initial bump.
This is why effects that forced wounds were so powerful. They basically
made a given limb more prone to taking a wound without having to deal
with the protection problem first.
Finally, this is just a broad flaw with the system that is not its
fault. It is actually a problem that isn't a problem. Most people in the
game are not wearing helmets that protect their head. So most people are
going to suffer from a higher proclivity of being wounded if people are
aiming for the head. There is this...kind of cargo cult belief that
aiming for the head means you do more damage, or can stun someone if
you're lucky or what have you. It's entirely nonsense, but it has a
grain of truth in that people rarely wear, or even have access too,
headwear that provides wound protection or any protection at all. People
have jumpsuits, which are universally wound protected, but that isn't
true of the head. Look, the point is, they're not aiming at the head
because it is usually less armored, its for other reasons but it just so
happens to become true due to wounds and how wounds roll their type.
To soften this issue, I've decided to treat wound resistance as armor
until the limb suffers a tier 3 wound. This way, hits to the head MAY
not necessarily escalate to tier 3 instantly as they would on live even
from relatively low power weapons. Some weapons have very low force, but
have extreme bare wound bonuses. This should be less likely after this
change. I doubt this will necessarily make high damage high wound
weapons like energy swords any less prone to cutting you clean open, but
it might thanks to the reduction to contributed damage to the injury
roll. The system is now _a bit more random_.
## Changelog
🆑
balance: Wounds do not make you as vulnerable to suffering wounds of all
types as before. Instead, wounds make you more vulnerable to suffering
worse versions of themselves as a priority.
balance: Wound armor is now more impactful when protecting you from
wounds when you have already been wounded.
balance: Your head and chest are more difficult to wound until they have
been mangled; either from suffering from a weeping avulsion or a
hairline fracture.
code: Changed the variable for bare_wound_bonus to exposed_wound_bonus
to better explain what that variable is doing.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: Jeremiah <42397676+jlsnow301@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
My original plan was to just implement materials into crafting so that
items would inherit the materials of their components, allowing for some
interesting stuff if the material flags of the item allow it. However to
my dismay crafting is a pile of old tech debt, starting from the old
`del_reqs` and `CheckParts` which still contain lines about old janky
bandaids that are no longer in use nor reachable, up to the
`customizable_reagent_holder` component which has some harddel issues
when your custom food is sliced, and items used in food recipes not
being deleted and instead stored inside the result with no purpose as
well as other inconsistencies like stack recipes that transfer materials
having counterparts in the UI that don't do that.
EDIT: Several things have come up while working on this, so I apologise
that it ended up changing over 100+ files. I managed to atomize some of
the changes, but it's a bit tedious.
EDIT: TLDR because I was told this section is too vague and there's too
much going on. This PR:
- Improves the dated crafting code (not the UI).
- replaced `atom/CheckParts` and `crafting_recipe/on_craft_completion`
with `atom/on_craft_completion`.
- Reqs used in food recipes are now deleted by default and not stored
inside the result (they did nothing).
- Renames the customizable_reagent_holder comp and improves it (No
harddels/ref issues).
- Adds a unit test that tries to craft all recipes to see what's wrong
(it skips some of the much more specific reqs for now).
- In the unit test is also the code to make sure materials of the
crafted item and a non-crafted item of the same type are roughly the
same, so far only applied to food.
- Some mild material/food refactoring around the fact that food item
code has been changed to support materials.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Improving the backbone of the crafting system. Also materials and food
code.
## Changelog
🆑
refactor: Refactored crafting backend. Report possible pesky bugs.
balance: the MEAT backpack (from the MEAT cargo pack) may be a smidge
different because of code standardization.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Melee attack chain now has a list passed along with it,
`attack_modifiers`, which you can stick force modifiers to change the
resulting attack
This is basically a soft implementation of damage packets until a more
definitive pr, but one that only applies to item attack chain, and not
unarmed attacks.
This change was done to facilitate a baton refactor - batons no longer
hack together their own attack chain, and are now integrated straight
into the real attack chain. This refactor itself was done because batons
don't send any attack signals, which has been annoying in the past (for
swing combat).
## Changelog
🆑 Melbert
refactor: Batons have been refactored again. Baton stuns now properly
count as an attack, when before it was a nothing. Report any oddities,
particularly in regards to harmbatonning vs normal batonning.
refactor: The method of adjusting item damage mid-attack has been
refactored - some affected items include the Nullblade and knives.
Report any strange happenings with damage numbers.
refactor: A few objects have been moved to the new interaction chain -
records consoles, mawed crucible, alien weeds and space vines, hedges,
restaurant portals, and some mobs - to name a few.
fix: Spears only deal bonus damage against secure lockers, not all
closet types (including crates)
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Metalgen imprinting is now logged, foam and smoke have better logging
and so do plasma metalgenned things, metalgen no longer causes a ton of
runtimes on almost everything and foam and smoke no longer affect
abstract objects.
Also ***hopefully*** solves the issue with infinite hotspot loops, but I
don't think anyone knows what exactly occured there.
## Why It's Good For The Game
If servers explode, admins need to know who did it and coders need to
know how they did it.
## Changelog
🆑
fix: Metalgen foam/smoke no longer cause an absurd amount of runtimes
fix: Foam and smoke no longer affect abstract objects like landmarks
admin: Metalgen imprinting is now logged
admin: Improved logging for foam and smoke, and plasma metalgenned
objects
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Adds a unit test that checks that all designs are accessible through
some source, be it techweb, disks, or innate designs. Certain designs,
like pocket extinguishers, entertainment screens, etc, that have been
present in autolathes but not in the techweb despite having PROTOLATHE
flag assigned have been put into protolathes (where it made sense,
otherwise the flag was removed).
An important change is that restaurant portals are now printable, and
thus can be constructed and deconstructed. Indestructible portals have
been a major gripe of mine for a while, and I don't see a solid reason
for keeping them indestructible if they can easily be printed from the
service protolathe.
Closes#90212
## Why It's Good For The Game
Initial argument for keeping portals unbreakable was to prevent people
from griefing the chef/bartender, but by that logic we can make most
machinery unbreakable too. I don't think that having an unbreakable
portal is good if its locking us out from allowing chefs/bartenders to
reorder or even outright reposition their lunchroom/bar.
## Changelog
🆑
balance: Restaurant portals can now be printed, constructed and
deconstructed. They're also no longer completely invulnerable.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This trainwreck of a PR is (hopefully) a final solution to all rendering
jank stemming from the new filter-based coloring system. I went over
every single instance of RESET_COLOR, either adding KEEP_APART or
rewriting them entirely so they render properly. I've also fixed blood
rendering issues by utilizing alpha filters and adding an abstract
"holder" appearance for worn items, which holds blood overlays on worn
clothing as to avoid coloring it. I've also fixed horrible
inconsistencies with atmos pipe coloring as a result (of getting sucked
down that rabbit hole) and converted all uses of COLOR_VERY_LIGHT_GRAY
in atmos code to ATMOS_COLOR_OMNI to avoid confusion.
MODsuit modules still get colored into MOD unit's color, need to
refactor their rendering for this.
Closes#88989Closes#87526Closes#89837
## Changelog
🆑
refactor: Audited all remaining coloring code - among noticeable
changes, blood should no longer get colored or "leak out" of item
bounds, atmos pipes no longer color weirdly and repairbots are white
again.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This is the first PR in a series attempting to modernize our damage and
armor, both from a code and a gameplay perspective. This part implements
unique attack animations, adds alternate attack modes for items and
fixes some minor oversights.
Items now have unique attack animation based on their sharpness - sharp
items are now swung in an arc, while pointy items are thrust forward.
This change is ***purely visual***, this is not swing combat. (However,
this does assign icon rotation data to many items, which should help
swing combat later down the line).
Certain items like knives and swords now have secondary attacks - right
clicks will perform stabbing attacks instead of slashing for a chance to
leave piercing wounds, albeit with slightly lower damage - trying to
stick a katana through someone won't get you very far!
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1f92bbcd-9aa1-482f-bc26-5e84fe2a07e1
Turns out that spears acted as oversized knives this entire time, being
SHARP_EDGED instead of SHARP_POINTY - in order for their animations to
make sense, they're now once again pointy (according to comment,
originally they were made sharp because piercing wounds weren't very
threatening, which is no longer the case)
Another major change is that structure damage is now influenced by armor
penetration - I am not sure if this is intentional or not, but attacking
item's AP never applied to non-mob damage.
Additionally, also fixes an issue where attack verbs for you and
everyone else may differ.
## About The Pull Request
Last night I was experimenting with hooking up different chemicals to a
shower and discovered that blood didn't really do anything other than
have red mist and particles. Your characters clothes were still cleaned.
The mood boost was still happy. So I reworked it a bit.
Blood now:
- Gives a negative mood, disgust, and status effect when showering with
it (unless you are morbid, evil, or undead, then it's considered
positive)
- Has an icon alert for bloody showers
- Covers a mob's clothing with blood when showering (or any objects on
the tile)
- Tossing or spraying a container full of blood now covers objects/mobs
in blood
- The revenant defile spell now affects showers by removing all water
recyclers and reagents that gets replaced with blood
Showers now:
- Require 70% of water to clean and get mood/status effects
- Require 70% of blood to get mood/status effects
- Require 20% of radioactive reagents to stop radiation removal effects
So it's possible to have a clean water shower that is secretly
radioactive. Since radioactive reagents do nothing on `TOUCH`, all this
achieves is preventing the water from washing off the radiation.
I did have to refactor some of the reagent code to support method types
for objects since I was experiencing hazmat issues when I was testing.
Whenever I would inject blood from a syringe into a beaker, it would
cover the beaker in blood on the outside. This would have been extremely
hazardous for viruses. So I needed to make sure we are only applying it
to the methods for `VAPOR|TOUCH`
Also improved the mood typecasting for owner to allow checking of mob
biotypes. (so we can check `UNDEAD` for mood)
## Why It's Good For The Game
Blood effects and interactions are now more consistent. The code for
objects is refactored to support method interactions with reagents.
Evil/Morbid people now get some unique interactions that fit their
theme. Last we get a cool new ability to let revenant's make their
defiled areas something out of a horror movie.
## Changelog
🆑
add: The revenant defile spell now affects showers by removing all water
recyclers and reagents that gets replaced with blood.
add: Showering in clean water (+70%) results in positive
mood/regen/stamina effects. It will wash off the mob.
add: Showering in dirty water results in negative mood effects and
disgust. It will NOT wash off the mob.
add: Showering with radioactive reagents (+20%) results in the
preventing the shower from washing off the radiation.
add: Showering in blood (+70%) results in severe negative mood effects
and disgust. (unless you are morbid, evil, or undead then it's
considered positive) It will cover the mob in blood.
add: Water effects that interact with a mob from touch or vapor
(showering/spray bottles/etc.) will now heal sleep, unconsciousness,
confusion, drowsiness, jitters, dizziness, and drunkenness.
fix: Fix bloody showers not covering objects in blood.
fix: Tossing or spraying a container full of blood now covers
objects/mobs in blood
fix: Fix wrong status effect for watery tile
image: Add new alert icons for bloody/dirty showers
code: Refactored some expose_obj reagent code to support method types.
code: Improved mood typecasting for owner to allow checking of mob
biotypes.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: MrMelbert <51863163+MrMelbert@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ghom <42542238+Ghommie@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
~~Kept you waitin huh!~~
The projectile refactor is finally here, 4 years later. This PR (almost)
completely rewrites projectile logic to be more maintainable and
performant.
### Key changes:
* Instead of moving by a fixed amount of pixels, potentially skipping
tile corners and being performance-heavy, projectiles now use
raymarching in order to teleport through tiles and only visually animate
themselves. This allows us to do custom per-projectile animations and
makes the code much more reliable, sane and maintainable. You (did not)
serve us well, pixel_move.
* Speed variable now measures how many tiles (if SSprojectiles has
default values) a projectile passes in a tick instead of being a magical
Kevinz Unit™️ coefficient. pixel_speed_multiplier has been retired
because it never had a right to exist in the first place. __This means
that downstreams will need to set all of their custom projectiles' speed
values to ``pixel_speed_multiplier / speed``__ in order to prevent
projectiles from inverting their speed.
* Hitscans no longer operate with spartial vectors and instead only
store key points in which the projectile impacted something or changed
its angle. This should similarly make the code much easier to work with,
as well as fixing some visual jank due to incorrect calculations.
* Projectiles only delete themselves the ***next*** tick after impacting
something or reaching their maximum range. Doing so allows them to
finish their impact animation and hide themselves between ticks via
animation chains. This means that projectiles no longer disappear ~a
tile before hitting their target, and that we can finally make impact
markers be consistent with where the projectile actually landed instead
of being entirely random.
<details>
<summary>Here is an example of how this affects our slowest-moving
projectile: Magic Missiles.</summary>
Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/06b3a980-4701-4aeb-aa3e-e21cd056020e
After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/abe8ed5c-4b81-4120-8d2f-cf16ff5be915
</details>
<details>
<summary>And here is a much faster, and currently jankier, disabler
SMG.</summary>
Before:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d84aef1-0c83-44ef-a698-8ec716587348
After:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2e7c1336-f611-404f-b3ff-87433398d238
</details>
### But how will this affect the ~~trout population~~ gameplay?
Beyond improved visuals, smoother movement and a few minor bugfixes,
this should not have a major gameplay impact. If something changed its
behavior in an unexpected way or started looking odd, please make an
issue report.
Projectile impacts should now be consistent with their visual position,
so hitting and dodging shots should be slightly easier and more
intuitive.
This PR should be testmerged extensively due to the amount of changes it
brings and considerable difficulty in reviewing them. Please contact me
to ensure its good to merge.
Closes#71822Closes#78547Closes#78871Closes#83901Closes#87802Closes#88073
## Why It's Good For The Game
Our core projectile code is an ungodly abomination that nobody except
me, Kapu and Potato dared to poke in the past months (potentially
longer). It is laggy, overcomplicated and absolutely unmaintaineable -
while a lot of decisions made sense 4 years ago when we were attempting
to introduce pixel movement, nowadays they are only acting as major
roadblocks for any contributor who is attempting to make projectile
behavior that differs from normal in any way.
Huge thanks to Kapu and Potato (Lemon) on the discord for providing
insights, ideas and advice throughout the past months regarding
potential improvements to projectile code, almost all of which made it
in.
## Changelog
🆑
qol: Projectiles now visually impact their targets instead of
disappearing about a tile short of it.
fix: Fixed multiple minor issues with projectile behavior
refactor: Completely rewrote almost all of our projectile code - if
anything broke or started looking/behaving oddly, make an issue report!
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Previous attempt - https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/87227
`/atom/proc/singularity_pull(obj/singularity/singularity, current_size)`
has first arg typed, but other procs were just referencing it as a
un-typed variable.
Since args are not standartized AND
`atom/proc/singularity_pull(obj/singularity/singularity, current_size)`
is out-dated, since it can be called by things that has
`/datum/component/singularity` - not just by
`obj/singularity/singularity` - This PR just adds args to every
`proc/singularity_pull()` as follows:
`proc/singularity_pull(atom/singularity, current_size)`
## Why It's Good For The Game
Standartization
## Changelog
No changelog needed
## About The Pull Request
I'm "cooking" the materials system a bit, specifically the code
responsible for applying and removing effects. My goal is to move most
of the code to the objects-side, split it in smaller procs that can be
more easily overriden or called for object-specific modifiers and
effects, while also revamping things all around to better support items
made from multiple materials (the cleric mace will most likely be one in
this PR, with the handle and tip made of different materials).
PR NO LONGER WIP, TESTED AND ALL, CLERIC MACES CAN NOW BE MADE OF TWO
MATERIALS.
## Why It's Good For The Game
One of the nastiest flaws with the materials system is that it's just
unfeasable to have items made of multiple mats (with effects enabled)
right now, as they easily tend to override each other, where some of the
modifiers and effects should only be applied the main material.
Beside, the system's starting to show signs of its time, from the
several type checks used to apply different effects, the one letter
variables to the the material flags that are still being passed down as
arguments when you can access them from the atom/source arg anyway. It
would be disonhest of me if I went ahead and coded material fishing rods
or whatever fish fuckery with materials without ensuring it won't
further the technical debt the feature currently has.
## Changelog
🆑
refactor: Refactored materials code. report any issue.
add: Cleric maces (The autolathe-printable weapon design from outer
space) can now be made of two different materials.
balance: Buffed cleric maces a little.
fix: toolboxes' stats are now affected by materials again.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: _0Steven <42909981+00-Steven@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
Another batch of changes to examine, ideas being courtesy of Melbert and
Swanni. When examining an item you will now see tags with tooltips
elaborating on their meaning instead of having each property displayed
in a separate line. Additionally, examines now use fieldsets, saving a
line previously spent on displaying an item's name and instead putting
it directly into the top outline. Embedding and slapcrafting also
display their properties as tags, and combat info now displays item's
sharpness.
Here are some examples, each tag previously taking up its own line.
Additionally, protection classes now better elaborate on items'
temperature protection properties and tell you the exact temperatures
that an item can withstand
## Why It's Good For The Game
Tags are a very intuitive system used in many games and we could benefit
from it too. Compressing seven lines of text into one while retaining
readability and all information within by using tooltips will majorly
cut down on chat space used by examines.
## Changelog
🆑
refactor: Refactored how examines display item properties. A lot of them
are now displayed as tags that you can hover over to receive details
about, like item size, resistances and materials an object is made of.
qol: Protection classes now better elaborate on thermal resistances of
items, displaying the exact temperatures they can protect you from.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
this is a revival of #82635 . i got permission from potato to reopen
this, he did almost all the work. i only just solved the conflicts and
fixed all the bugs that were preventing the original from being merged
(but it should be TMed first)
## Why It's Good For The Game
slightly improves the performance of basic mob AI
## Changelog
🆑
LemonInTheDark
refactor: able_to_run and incapacitated have been refactored to be event
based
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: LemonInTheDark <58055496+LemonInTheDark@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ZephyrTFA <matthew@tfaluc.com>
## About The Pull Request
Fixes several errors to spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
## Why It's Good For The Game
## Changelog
🆑
spellcheck: fixed a few typos
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Closes#81260Closes#74022
Currently mechs are the only atoms utilizing attack_dir but I added it
in multiple other places that were missing it to ensure that if
something else uses it it won't break in those scenarios
## Changelog
🆑
fix: Mechs' directional armor now actually works
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
While working out railing layering rank, I noticed this issue:
This seems to be because we allow objects to have their `pixel_y` be
offset when anchored on top of a table, which causes it to peek into the
next tile up, thus layering us on top of it.
Making it use `pixel_z` instead such that it's only visually offset
fixes this:
Additionally, while we're touching the `check_on_table()` proc, we make
it remove the `pixel_z` offset whenever it gets unanchored instead of
only whenever it gets unanchored _on a table_.
Ideally we would also make such vertically offset objects remove their
offset when the table they're on gets destroyed, but that's not the
point of this pr.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Tends to be better to not look like you're standing on something you're
not.
It's a bit annoying when you destroy the table under a vertically offset
object and now can't remove that offset until you put it on a table
again.
## Changelog
🆑
fix: You no longer render on top of tall enough objects that get
vertically offset when anchored to a table when standing on the tile
directly to the north of them. Examples are soda and booze dispensers.
fix: Removing the vertical offset some objects get when anchored to a
table can be done by unanchoring it at any point, rather than only on a
table.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
it's - conjunction of "it" and "is"
its - possessive form of "it"
grammar is hard, and there were a lot of places where "it's" was used
where it shouldn't have been. i went and painstakingly searched the
entire repository for these instances, spending a few hours on it. i
completely ignored the changelog archive, and i may have missed some
outliers. most player-facing ones should be corrected, though
## Why It's Good For The Game
proper grammar is good
## Changelog
🆑
spellcheck: Numerous instances of "it's" have been properly replaced
with "its"
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Rewrites how alt click works.
Based heavily on #82625. What a cool concept, it flows nicely with
#82533.
Fixes#81242
(tm bugs fixed)
Fixes#82668
<details><summary>More info for devs</summary>
Handy regex used for alt click s&r:
`AltClick\((.*).*\)(\n\t.*\.\.\(\))?`
`click_alt($1)` (yes I am aware this only copies the first arg. there
are no other args!)
### Obj reskins
No reason for obj reskin to check on every single alt click for every
object. It applies to only a few items.
- Moved to obj/item
- Made into signal
- Added screentips
### Ventcrawling
Every single atmospherics machine checked for ventcrawling capability on
alt click despite only 3 objects needing that functionality. This has
been moved down to those individual items.
</details>
## Why It's Good For The Game
For players:
- Alt clicking should work more logically, not causing double actions
like eject disk and open item window
- Added context menus for reskinnable items
- Removed adjacency restriction on loot panel
For devs:
- Makes alt click interactions easier to work with, no more click chain
nonsense and redundant guard clauses.
- OOP hell reduced
- Pascal Case reduced
- Glorious snake case
## Changelog
🆑
add: The lootpanel now works at range.
add: Screentips for reskinnable items.
fix: Alt click interactions have been refactored, which may lead to
unintentional changes to gameplay. Report any issues, please.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This is the final PR for https://hackmd.io/XLt5MoRvRxuhFbwtk4VAUA that
I've been slowly inching towards the past few months.
This removes ``updateDialog``, ``updateUsrDialog``, ``IN_USE``,
``INTERACT_MACHINE_SET_MACHINE``, and everything surrounding it. Also
fixes advanced camera consoles not booting you off when you're moved out
of reach.
We called ``check_eye`` on mob life whenever they had their machine var
set, but their machine var would never be set to anything that actually
used it, which I found to be a little funny but was also probably my
fault.
## Why It's Good For The Game
This is poor and unmaintained code used for HTML UIs that we no longer
need thanks to TGUI, we should get rid of it to encourage the use of
TGUI in the future instead.
## Changelog
🆑
fix: Advanced camera consoles now boots you off when you're moved out of
reach.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Fixes https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/issues/82543
`"You pulverise the table with the pickaxe.!"` => `"You pulverise the
table with the pickaxe."`
## Changelog
🆑
spellcheck: Effectively hitting furniture and machines with objects will
no longer be double punctuated.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
When it comes to deconstructing an object we have `proc/deconstruct()` &
`NO_DECONSTRUCT`
Lets talk about the flag first.
**Problems with `NO_DECONSTRUCTION`**
I know what the comment says on what it should do
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/b5593bc6930cb60803214869a7b94c84e7baa02c/code/__DEFINES/obj_flags.dm#L18
But everywhere people have decided to give their own meaning/definition
to this flag. Here are some examples on how this flag is used
**1. Make the object just disappear(not drop anything) when
deconstructed**
This is by far the largest use case everywhere. If an object is
deconstructed(either via tools or smashed apart) then if it has this
flag it should not drop any of its contents but just disappear. You have
seen this code pattern used everywhere
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/b5593bc6930cb60803214869a7b94c84e7baa02c/code/game/machinery/constructable_frame.dm#L26-L31
This behaviour is then leveraged by 2 important components.
When an object is frozen, if it is deconstructed it should just
disappear without leaving any traces behind
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/b5593bc6930cb60803214869a7b94c84e7baa02c/code/datums/elements/frozen.dm#L66-L67
By hologram objects. Obviously if you destroy an hologram nothing real
should drop out
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/b5593bc6930cb60803214869a7b94c84e7baa02c/code/modules/holodeck/computer.dm#L301-L304
And there are other use cases as well but we won't go into them as they
aren't as significant as these.
**2. To stop an object from being wrenched ??**
Yeah this one is weird. Like why? I understand in some instances (chair,
table, rack etc) a wrench can be used to deconstruct a object so using
the flag there to stop it from happening makes sense but why can't we
even anchor an object just because of this flag?
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/b5593bc6930cb60803214869a7b94c84e7baa02c/code/game/objects/objs.dm#L368-L369
This is one of those instances where somebody just decided this
behaviour for their own convenience just like the above example with no
explanation as to why
**3. To stop using tools to deconstruct the object**
This was the original intent of the flag but it is enforced in few
places far & between. One example is when deconstructing the a machine
via crowbar.
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/b5593bc6930cb60803214869a7b94c84e7baa02c/code/game/machinery/_machinery.dm#L811
But machines are a special dual use case for this flag. Because if you
look at its deconstruct proc the flag also prevents the machine from
spawning a frame.
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/b5593bc6930cb60803214869a7b94c84e7baa02c/code/game/machinery/_machinery.dm#L820-L822
How can 1 flag serve 2 purposes within the same type?
**4. Simply forget to check for this flag altogether**
Yup if you find this flag not doing its job for some objects don't be
surprised. People & sometimes even maintainers just forget that it even
exists
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/b5593bc6930cb60803214869a7b94c84e7baa02c/code/game/objects/items/piggy_bank.dm#L66-L67
**Solution**
These are the main examples i found. As you can see the same flag can
perform 2 different functions within the same type and do something else
in a different object & in some instances don't even work cause people
just forget, etc.
In order to bring consistency to this flag we need to move it to the
atom level where it means the same thing everywhere. Where in the atom
you may ask? .Well, I'll just post what MrMelbert said in
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/81656#discussion_r1503086862
> ...Ideally the .deconstruct call would handle NO_DECONSTRUCTION
handling as it wants,
Yup that's the ideal case now. This flag is checked directly in
`deconstruct()`. Now like i said we want to give a universal definition
to this flag and as you have seen from my examples it is used in 3 cases
1) Make an object disappear(doesn't dropping anything) when
deconstructed
2) Stop it from being wrenched
3) Stop it from being deconstructed via tools
We can't enforce points 2 & 3 inside `deconstruct()` which leaves us
with only case 1) i.e. make the object disappear. And that's what i have
done. Therefore after more than a decade or since this flag got
introduced `NO_DECONSTRUCT` now has a new definition as of 2024
_"Make an object disappear(don't dropping anything) when deconstructed
either via tools or forcefully smashed apart"_
Now i very well understand this will open up bugs in places where cases
2 & 3 are required but its worth it. In fact they could even be qol
changes for all we know so who knows it might even benefit us but for
now we need to give a universal definition to this flag to bring some
consistency & that's what this PR does.
**Problem with deconstruct()**
This proc actually sends out a signal which is currently used by the
material container but could be used by other objects later on.
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/3e84c3e6dad33c831ac259f52f2f023680e4899b/code/game/objects/obj_defense.dm#L160
So objects that override this proc should call its parent. Sadly that
isn't the case in many instances like such
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/3e84c3e6dad33c831ac259f52f2f023680e4899b/code/game/machinery/deployable.dm#L20-L23
Instead of `return ..()` which would delete the object & send the signal
it deletes the object directly thus the signal never gets sent.
**Solution**
Make this proc non overridable. For objects to add their own custom
deconstruction behaviour a new proc has been introduced
`atom_deconstruct()` Subtypes should now override this proc to handle
object deconstruction.
If objects have certain important stuff inside them (like mobs in
machines for example) they want to drop by handling `NO_DECONSTRUCT`
flag in a more carefully customized way they can do this by overriding
`handle_deconstruct()` which by default delegates to
`atom_deconstruct()` if the `NO_DECONSTRUCT` flag is absent. This proc
will allow you to handle the flag in a more customized way if you ever
need to.
## Why It's Good For The Game
1) I'm goanna post the full comment from MrMelbert
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/81656#discussion_r1503086862
> ...Ideally the .deconstruct call would handle NO_DECONSTRUCTION
handling as it wants, but there's a shocking lack of consistency around
NO_DECONSTRUCTION, where some objects treat it as "allow deconstruction,
but make it drop no parts" and others simply "disallow deconstruction at
all"
This PR now makes `NO_DECONSTRUCTION` handled by `deconstruct()` & gives
this flag the consistency it deserves. Not to mention as shown in case 4
there are objects that simply forgot to check for this flag. Now it
applies for those missing instances as well.
2) No more copying pasting the most overused code pattern in this code
base history `if(obj_flags & NO_DECONSTRUCTION)`. Just makes code
cleaner everywhere
3) All objects now send the `COMSIG_OBJ_DECONSTRUCT` signal on object
deconstruction which is now available for use should you need it
## Changelog
🆑
refactor: refactors how objects are deconstructed in relation to the
`NO_DECONSTRUCTION` flag. Certain objects & machinery may display
different tool interactions & behaviours when destroyed/deconstructed.
Report these changes if you feel like they are bugs
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: san7890 <the@san7890.com>
## About The Pull Request
Basically when a shield gets hit it calls upon its (ouchy) code from its
parent (obj) and instead of overriding like 4 different procs that are
used to attack objects (projectile/attack paw/hulksmash/normal melee) I
added a no_damage_feedback variable to the obj parent that
hulk/projectile/attackpaw/nonhulk melee now use when the object being
hit isnt actually taking damage. Then I made it so when a shield gets
hit it refers to the fact that you are indeed doing something, just that
your damage is working differently than normal.
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/assets/62126254/b9c294b9-416a-4d1f-bf1b-54b9339a66ae
After I recorded this video I uncapitalized all modular shield generator
assets since they are generic objects and dont have unique names, so
they wont be capitalized mid attack text.
## Why It's Good For The Game
For starters, now people know they can actually break forcefields
instead of smacking it twice then getting dissuaded because the obj code
told them they are stupid for trying.
And I believe that the way I went about doing this opens up
opportunities for more stagnant structures that are damaged in different
ways (Like say IndieanaJones could make space dragon's portals take x
amount of hits to go down so a hulk/durand cant just 2 shot without
having to buff its health/armor values to such an extent that you can
only break it with a hulk/durand)
As it currently stands, obj damage is not balanced, the crew are largely
locked away from decent obj damage because being able to break
structures = aa, simple mobs are given very large obj damage modifiers
because they dont have access id cards.
This pr should lower the bar for designing objects that operate a little
bit differently in terms of receiving damage in order to accommodate for
this, but are still objects and need to use it as a parent.
## Changelog
🆑
fix: Modular shields now give correct feedback and no longer dissuade
individuals from breaking them.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This PR does many things, I'll try to explain the basic/background stuff
to the main thing first:
1. Adds a new remote that allows a human to function like an AI. It
controls a fly that will fly around the station slowly, and when it
reaches a machine then the person can interact with it as if they were
an AI. This required changing a lot of silicon/AI checks with one that
also checks for this remote, and some messing with shared ui state.
2. Moves req_access from the obj and bot to ``/atom/movable`` which lets
it be shared between the two, no more copy-paste and one side lacking
features/checks/signals the other has.
3. Adds a check for AI config for AI-related station traits, which was
lacking prior
Now for the good part...
Adds a new station trait that replaces the AI with a Human.
This person is equipped with an AI headset (including Binary), an
advanced camera console, an omni door wand, the machine controller, and
their laws.
They are immune to the SAT's turrets (even if set to target borgs) and
are slow outside of the SAT, mimicing the actions of the AI.
They interact with the world through their advanced camera console,
which allows them to do most AI stuff needed, and the holopad they can
connect to without having to ring first (like Command can).
They are given a paper with the laws they must follow, but since they
are human they are able to bend it. Cyborgs that run the default lawset
are "slaved" to them via an unremovable law 0, so the Human AI can bend
the laws if they really need to (for their own survival n such), and
make the cyborgs obey their commands above laws, but in general this
shouldn't be a frequent occurrence. This does take into account the
unique AI trait, so it's not guaranteed Asimov.
When this station trait rolls, all Intellicards, AI uploads, and AI core
boards are destroyed and are unresearchable. They can be spawned by
admins in-game if necessary. Maybe in the future we can also exclude
Oldstation from this but I haven't really decided.
Extra perks:
Human AI spawns with a Robotic voicebox (unless they are a body purist)
and teleport blocking implant, so they can't use teleporters to bypass
their on-station slowdown.
They also have an infinite laser pointer that can be used to blind
through their camera console. This is unfortunately nerfed from the
recent borg balance PR that removed its stun. This was meant to be the
alternative to no longer being able to permanently lock borgs down like
AIs can (or more than one, for that matter).
They aren't affected by Roburgers, Acid, and Fuel's toxicity.
Bots salute them like they do Beepsky (which is now a trait)
They spawn with SyndEye to replace the AI's tracking ability
They do not have a bank account
### The machine remote
The machine remote has a little fly in it that flies to the machines it
is pointed to, working as the arms and legs of the Human AI. It scans
the machine and punches in the action the AI does, and is how the AI
accesses basically anything. This fly slowly moves from one machine to
the next, and can be recalled with Alt Click.
It works on machines and bots.
### Video (Low quality to fit Github)
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/assets/53777086/e16509f8-8bed-42b5-9fbf-7e37165a11e8
## Why It's Good For The Game
I've seen a funny screenshot one day of a person replacing the AI by
using a bunch of door remotes, camera console, crew monitoring console,
and a few other things. I've been thinking about that for a few years
and really wanted to make it official if not easier to make possible,
because it is an incredibly funny interaction.
This makes it a reality, and while they aren't as powerful as regular
AIs, I think it makes for better and funnier in-game moments. With the
same weight as Cargorilla (1), I hope this wouldn't be rolling too often
and ruin rounds, but instead show off the different capabilities that
Humans and AIs can do, to do the job of an AI. You win some you lose
some.
## Changelog
🆑 JohnFulpWillard, Tattax
add: Adds a new station trait job: The Human AI.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: MrMelbert <51863163+MrMelbert@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
Fixes#81205
~~Adds a new flag for letting you move otherwise un-deconstructable
objects and making deconstructable objects immovable with a wrench.~~
~~Adds that flag onto the ORM.~~
makes ~~ORM un-unwrenchable,~~ deathtrap recycler unwrenchable.
## Why It's Good For The Game
seems like an oversight on the recycler that unnecessarily limited
gimmicks, ~~and one of the long-running peeves with something like the
ORM has been how damn easy it is to walk up to it, unwrench it, and walk
into cargo through the windoor mapped for mineral storage access (which
basically everyone has.) This makes it so if you'd otherwise do that,
now you at least need to either deconstruct or destroy the ORM first (or
just take another less obvious way in.) Always seemed like an oversight
but can atomize it if wanted.~~ atomized out, will ask around before
putting back up
## Changelog
🆑
fix: deathtrap recycler can now be moved.
refactor: moved check for NO_DECONSTRUCTION flag to be inside
can_be_unfasten_wrench, allowing us to set specific machines to be
movable but not deconstructable.
/🆑
This flag only worked on the `/obj/structure` and `/obj/machinery`
level, so let's rescope it from `flags_1` and put it where it belongs -
`obj_flags`.
Bitflag operators should be scoped to their subtype specific bitfield,
not really useful to have this take up a spot on the `/atom` level if
absolutely nothing other than `/obj`s use it.
## About The Pull Request
On the tin, this lived on the `/obj` level and polluted a lot of stuff
even though only a very small fraction of stuff actually leveraged it.
Let's make it a trait for that boolean-like behavior so I can be happier
scrolling through view-variables with less non-necessary things.
I wish we could tie it to unique sources but that whole drinking glass
thing makes me suspicious of weirder things so I think the way we do it
(source being a `REF()` to the thing itself) is probably fine enough for
the time being.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Same behavior one can expect but just a bit cleaner on the backend.
## Changelog
Nothing that particularly concerns players.
## About The Pull Request
Standardizes vv_do_topic() procs on subtypes
Mostly formatting changes
- Add a !. check for every subtype
- Add a space in between each href_list
- Standardize !check_rights(), default is !check_rights(NONE) in the
event that something isnt specified
## About The Pull Request
LSP supports it, let's GOOOOOO
I've removed the 515 tests since they're stable, alongside the libcall
wrapper. left the rustgcall wrapper cause yaknow memes
Just removed all the 515 and 514 particular define wrappers. gaming
## Changelog
🆑
server: Minimum compile version has been bumped to 515. clients still
support 514 but we're gonna start using 515 restricted features for
serverside now.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: John Willard <53777086+JohnFulpWillard@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
This PR makes the following changes:
- Refactors inserting items into foam darts into a component on items
that can be inserted into darts
- Adds the aforementioned component to pens
- Provides an inspection tip for how to modify a foam dart
- Gives different pen types specific behavior when used in a foam dart
Pens typically give a foam dart 5 brute and 50% embed chance (affected
by falloff). The following types of pens give the specified properties
(usually directly derived from the pen's stats and additional
functions):
- Red pen (and four-color pen set to red): Slightly faster dart
- Captain's fountain pen: Slightly faster dart, and 75% base embed
chance
- Sleepypen: Tries to inject its reagents into the hit mob, but doesn't
penetrate thick clothing like syringe guns do
- Energy Dagger: 35 brute, 100% base embed chance, and slightly faster
dart
- Survival Pen: Mines rocks on impact
- Fine Tip Pen (if someone somehow manages to get one): 100 bare wound
bonus and 9000 demolition modifier
## Why It's Good For The Game
Expands the emergent gameplay possibilities of using pens in foam darts.
While there are balance risks involved with traitors being able to buy
the equivalent of reusable 45u syringe shots and 35 brute bullets, you
are not likely to get your pen back once it hits its target, unless you
somehow have the recall spell and have bound the pen to it. There are
probably more TC-efficient ways to achieve comparable projectile
weaponry, but foam dart guns have an air of subtlety to them... at least
until your skin is pierced by a pointy writing implement that may also
be something more deadly. If maintainers still have balance concerns,
please let me know.
## Changelog
🆑
add: Certain types of pens now function like you expect they would when
inserted into a foam dart
qol: Examining a foam dart closely will show you how to modify it, or
what it is modified with
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Replaces a ton of `turn(dir, 180)` calls with the aforementioned macro.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Afaik, `REVERSE_DIR` was coded to be faster than the classic `turn(dir,
180)` call, being a simple set of binary operations. To sum it up, micro
optimization.
## Changelog
N/A
A long long time ago, when I was but a wee coder, I made the Scrubber
Clog event. I wasn't great at coding then, but about a year later I have
returned to finish what I started.
This PR contains a full code/balance/feature update for the event,
bringing it up to what fledgeling coder Rhials had envisioned but wasn't
experienced enough to do. This contains no fundamental or conceptual
changes, just some TLC.
Since everything's in a new file and there isn't a diff to compare
things with, I'll try to give a quick summary of everything:
FEATURES:
- _The clog event now uses the ventilation pumps instead of scrubbers.
It is now the ventilation clog event. Rejoice._
- Clogs now make a filthy mess when they occur, and make noise when
spawning mobs.
- As more mobs spawn, even more of a mess is made. Different clog event
intensities will produce different messes.
- The mob roster has been updated to include the Mobroach, Mothroach,
and Viscerator for the Strange clog event, and the Hauberroach for the
Major clog event.
CODE:
- The event is now fully self-contained, without requiring any code on
the vent itself to work.
- plunger_act() now has its own signal.
BALANCE (This is just a bunch of tiny insignificant number tweaking
don't worry):
- More mobs can be spawned at once by the event. This shouldn't have any
real impact on how dangerous the minor/major clog events are, but might
make the critical/strange events a smidge more dangerous.
- Max occurrences have been increased. The minor/major clog events are
no longer limited to only three per round.
- There is now a slight chance that a clog event will not announce
itself.
## About The Pull Request
Added a variable to `/obj/` that can be set to adjust the object sprite
when it mapspawns or being wrenched on top of a table.
Set this variable for some popular tabletop machines, removing the
default `pixel_y` offsets for some of them.
Also moved the wrenching logic to /obj/. It was under machinery for some
reason.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Did you ever unwrench something from the table by accident and then was
annoyed that you can't revet it back?
## Changelog
🆑
qol: Objects have a variable to adjust them visually when they're
wrenched or spawned on a table
refactor: Removed redundant code that had similar purpose, moved `obj`
wrenching logic into the `objs.dm`
qol: food/slime processor can be moved on table and adjusts to it when
wrenched
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Generally cleans up code on both components.
Moves burn proc back to /obj level, I'm not sure why I moved it to /atom
level, it was unnecessary.
Acid component generalized so it can be used on any atom that uses
atom_integrity.
Fixes a bug where objects that stopped burning didn't update their burn
overlay properly due to bad removal logic and leftover code.
Standardizes examine messages on burning items by just slapping an
examine signal registration on the component.
Adds fire particles to items thanks to Lemon's PR:
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/74524
## Why It's Good For The Game
Particles look cool
Bugfixes are good
Code improvements are good
## Changelog
🆑
add: Burning items now get (small) smoke particles. Sick.
fix: Burning objects now clear their burning overlay properly.
qol: Examining burning objects will always tell you that they are
burning.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: san7890 <the@san7890.com>
## About The Pull Request
Removes network_id as it was completely unused now.
Also reworks the maints access secret buttons to work with how accesses
work now, taking into account req_one_access. This is theoretically a
problem when we moved to req_one_access more often in maints so
departments can access their own maint areas.
## Why It's Good For The Game
This is just minor changes I found while trying to edit other things,
and thought I should PR it.
## Changelog
🆑
admin: Secret buttons for Engineering/Brig maint accesses should now
work more consistently.
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This is a continuation of
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/74085 - I announced in the
comments there that this would be my next PR, and this is it.
Removes SSnetwork, ``/datum/ntnet``,
``/datum/component/ntnet_interface``, ``var/network_root_id``, the
network unit test, and a lot of other things related to networks.
- NTNet circuits now check for an Ntnet relay, and uses signals to
operate.
- Logs in Wirecarp is now only for PDA and Ntnet Relay things, so you
can no longer see what ruins exist using it (why should Wirecarp know
that Oldstation spawned? The flavor is that they dont know its there).
- Removed it from MULEbots entirely, I don't think it even did anything
for them? Botkeeper seems to work without it, so it's possibly there
from pre-tgui PDAs.
- Moves assigning random names to a base proc instead of being tied to
network, this is things like random-naming scrubbers/vents. The behavior
hasn't changed at all.
- Makes Ntos work for consoles when relays are down, as the comments
said they're supposed to (because they're wired). I think this was an
accidental change on my part, so this is a revert of that.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Ntnet is ancient code that hasn't given us much that we can't do with
already existing alternatives, we've been slowly moving away from it for
init times, and though a large portion of that was limited to airlocks,
I still don't think this is a system worth keeping around.
It's way too complex to expect feature coders to do anything with it,
and too old with better alternatives for anyone to want to improve any
of it.
## Changelog
🆑
fix: Computers are now properly connected to Ethernet, and can use Ntos
when Relays are down.
refactor: Removes Ntnet and Ntnet interfaces, which was only used by
Ntnet circuits (which now directly checks for a Relay to work) and
MULEbots, which did nothing with it.
balance: Wirecarp no longer tells you what ruins spawned in a round,
instead it's limited to PDA logs, and tells you the source too. This
means the RD can catch someone running illegal programs if they don't
make any attempt at hiding it.
qol: Wirecarp logs is now set to save 300 at once, instead of 100 and
being increased to 300 by the RD during the round. This is pretty
insignificant, since there's no reason to NOT want as many logs as
possible.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: Zephyr <12817816+ZephyrTFA@users.noreply.github.com>
Although all objects that _have_ the flag attach it to
`resistance_flags` (which is what the define location implies it's
supposed to be set on), all the code that checked it for the purposes of
applying the freezing element used `obj_flags`.
As far as I can tell, that meant the only things immune to freezing were
things that "blocked z falling from above".
Also, freezing only happens with some obscure weapons and low
temperature water vapour, but hey 🤷.
🆑 coiax
fix: Coffee cups are now correctly immune to becoming frozen by low
temperature water vapour.
/🆑
---
Shout out to RaveRadbury who helped me with debugging this.
This builds on what #69790 did and improved the code even further.
Notable things:
- `Topic()` is a deprecated proc in our codebase (replaced with
Javascript tgui) so it makes sense to rename `canUseTopic` to
`can_perform_action` which is more straightforward in what it does.
- Positional and named arguments have been converted into a easier to
use `action_bitflag`
- The bitflags adds some new checks you can use like: `NEED_GRAVITY |
NEED_LITERACY | NEED_LIGHT` when you want to perform an action.
- Redundant, duplicate, or dead code has been removed.
- Fixes several runtimes where `canUseTopic` was being called without a
proper target (IV drips, gibber, food processor)
- Better documentation for the proc and bitflags with examples
MrMelbert
