## About The Pull Request
It's just a partial cleanup of
anti-[STYLE](https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/master/.github/guides/STYLE.md)
code from /tg/'s ancient history. I compiled & tested with my helpful
assistant and damage is still working.
<img width="1920" height="1040" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/26dabc17-088f-4008-b299-3ff4c27142c3"
/>
I'll upload the .cs script I used to do it shortly.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Just minor code cleanup.
Script used is located at https://metek.tech/camelTo-Snake.7z
EDIT 11/23/25: Updated the script to use multithreading and sequential
scan so it works a hell of a lot faster
```
/*
//
Copyright 2025 Joshua 'Joan Metekillot' Kidder
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
//
*/
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
class Program
{
static async Task Main(string[] args)
{
var readFile = new FileStreamOptions
{
Access = FileAccess.Read,
Share = FileShare.ReadWrite,
Options = FileOptions.Asynchronous | FileOptions.SequentialScan
};
FileStreamOptions writeFile = new FileStreamOptions
{
Share = FileShare.ReadWrite,
Access = FileAccess.ReadWrite,
Mode = FileMode.Truncate,
Options = FileOptions.Asynchronous
};
RegexOptions regexOptions = RegexOptions.Multiline | RegexOptions.Compiled;
Dictionary<string, int> changedProcs = new();
string regexPattern = @"(?<=\P{L})([a-z]+)([A-Z]{1,2}[a-z]+)*(Brute|Burn|Fire|Tox|Oxy|Organ|Stamina)(Loss)([A-Z]{1,2}[a-z]+)*";
Regex camelCaseProcRegex = new(regexPattern, regexOptions);
string snakeify(Match matchingRegex)
{
var vals =
matchingRegex.Groups.Cast<Group>().SelectMany(_ => _.Captures).Select(_ => _.Value).ToArray();
var newVal = string.Join("_", vals.Skip(1).ToArray()).ToLower();
string logString = $"{vals[0]} => {newVal}";
if (changedProcs.TryGetValue(logString, out int value))
{
changedProcs[logString] = value + 1;
}
else
{
changedProcs.Add(logString, 1);
}
return newVal;
}
var dmFiles = Directory.EnumerateFiles(".", "*.dm", SearchOption.AllDirectories).ToAsyncEnumerable<string>();
// uses default ParallelOptions
// https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.threading.tasks.paralleloptions?view=net-10.0#main
await Parallel.ForEachAsync(dmFiles, async (filePath, UnusedCancellationToken) =>
{
var reader = new StreamReader(filePath, readFile);
string oldContent = await reader.ReadToEndAsync();
string newContent = camelCaseProcRegex.Replace(oldContent, new MatchEvaluator((Func<Match, string>)snakeify));
if (oldContent != newContent)
{
var writer = new StreamWriter(filePath, writeFile);
await writer.WriteAsync(newContent);
await writer.DisposeAsync();
}
reader.Dispose();
});
var logToList = changedProcs.Cast<KeyValuePair<string, int>>().ToList();
foreach (var pair in logToList)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{pair.Key}: {pair.Value} locations");
}
}
}
```
## Changelog
🆑 Bisar
code: All (Brute|Burn|Fire|Tox|Oxy|Organ|Stamina)(Loss) procs now use
snake_case, in-line with the STYLE guide. Underscores rule!
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This is a big one so please bear with me, wounds are complicated
### Max Potential Wound Rolls
We've decreased the max contributed damage to wound rolls from 35 to 25.
This results, after the exponent, a max possible wound roll of 1 to 91
before any modifiers (assuming the attack, after armor, is 25 or above).
The minimum value to wound is still 5.
### Wound Escalation Penalties
Most wounds were contributing significant numbers per wound type to the
potential for a new wound to occur. Getting wounded once meant you were
getting wound a lot, but actually getting past that first wounding may
be the tricky part.
We have significantly reigned in the wound penalty that having a wound
contributes, and instead utilize the series wound penalty to allow same
type wounds to escalate themselves faster as a priority. Having wounds
still makes you more wound vulnerable, just not to such an extreme
degree.
The priority here for what wounds matter most for contributing to
overall wounding vulnerability is ``Infected BURNS > BURNS >
SLASH|PIERCE > BLUNT.``
### Wound Armor
Wound armor, unlike all other kinds of armor, was used as a additive
value to the wound roll modifiers rather than a multiplicative value.
We have reworked how wound armor is determined by changing how wound
modifiers are calculated.
Firstly, we're passing our entire injury roll into the
``check_woundings_mod()`` proc, as we're not treating this as a proc
that just adds values anymore.
Secondly, bare wound bonus only applies if there is no potential wound
protection from any source, as expected. But it comes last in the
calculations.
Thirdly, wound protection is applied to the injury roll last, after
wound bonuses from the attack, wound bonuses from other wounds and wound
bonuses from a disabled limb are applied. This does not include serial
wound bonuses, which are determined outside of this proc.
Wound protection comes from two sources. Clothing and limb wound
resistance. Your chest and head have an amount of wound resistance so
long as they are not mangled in any fashion. Being mangled means having
either a hairline fracture or a weeping avulsion wound.
Wound protection reduces the final injury roll by a percentage. Say our
roll is 50, and we have effectively 50% wound protection. The final roll
would be 25.
### ~~Wound Armor on Clothing~~ Reverted
~~Most clothing have had their wound armor values changed. As a loose
rule, I used the highest of melee or bomb armor, except where that value
was 100, in which case I used the lowest instead. I'm basing this
decision on how embeds are calculated, which is attack type agnostic.~~
~~Some armor have inconsistent values because they are alternative
armors to an existing armor type or are hyperspecialized armor.
Ablative, bulletproof and security vests all share a value of 35,
despite the former two not having decent melee or bomb armor.~~
~~Some clothing missing wound armor that should have had them now have
wound armor.~~
~~This may need a bit of scrutiny in case one or two seem weirdly high.
Some have maybe become too low. Its a bit hard to say.~~
### The ``bare_wound_bonus`` variable
I changed it to ``exposed_wound_bonus`` to better represent when it
applies. You can be naked and still not be affected by this bonus if the
limb has wound resistance.
## Why It's Good For The Game
I'm not promising anything with this PR, but this is an attempt to
sanity check the values on wounds so that we're not seeing what the data
that determined the removal of beheading presented. An extreme
over-representation of tier 3 wounds. ~~And, from that, maybe I can
argue for beheadings coming back. That's my goal. I think beheadings
happened so much because the numbers were in need of work.~~ Well okay I
just wanna make wounds a bit more workable actually more than I want
beheadings.
Why is it that tier 3 wounds were so over-represented? Because wounds
will often force more severe wounds of other types by merit of any
wounds existing at all on a limb. Having **_a_** wound makes you more
wound prone for any kind of wound, and not just making you more likely
to suffer a more severe type of the same wound.
The threshold mechanic was intended to simulate making a wound worse,
but oddly just made a limb broadly more prone to getting worse from any
kind of attack to such a degree that future wound rolls of different
types were often going to start at the threshold necessary to be a tier
3 wound.
Dismemberment, mind you, requires you to suffer a flesh wound while you
have a bone wound of tier 2 or higher (with tier 3 giving a bonus to
this). You can do this readily via just a sharp weapon, because having a
mangled limb causes the wound to turn into a bone wound. Technically,
this is meant to be less likely as the effective damage for this wound
is halved. But the wound bonus from having a flesh wound was almost
always significant enough to kick your new bone wound up to a tier 3.
In other words; its not surprising that you saw so many beheadings,
because the system wanted to behead you as fast as it possibly can
thanks to all these escalating values.
Wound armor was only applied as a flat reduction on the roll. The
average for wound armor was 10. After receiving a single wound, you can
expect wound rolls to reach upwards of 100, even if the actual damage
roll was not particularly high, due to wound stacking bonuses form being
wounded.
This meant that wounds, if they happened, came thick and fast after the
first, regardless of what your protection might be to wounds. It was
just a matter of getting past the initial bump.
This is why effects that forced wounds were so powerful. They basically
made a given limb more prone to taking a wound without having to deal
with the protection problem first.
Finally, this is just a broad flaw with the system that is not its
fault. It is actually a problem that isn't a problem. Most people in the
game are not wearing helmets that protect their head. So most people are
going to suffer from a higher proclivity of being wounded if people are
aiming for the head. There is this...kind of cargo cult belief that
aiming for the head means you do more damage, or can stun someone if
you're lucky or what have you. It's entirely nonsense, but it has a
grain of truth in that people rarely wear, or even have access too,
headwear that provides wound protection or any protection at all. People
have jumpsuits, which are universally wound protected, but that isn't
true of the head. Look, the point is, they're not aiming at the head
because it is usually less armored, its for other reasons but it just so
happens to become true due to wounds and how wounds roll their type.
To soften this issue, I've decided to treat wound resistance as armor
until the limb suffers a tier 3 wound. This way, hits to the head MAY
not necessarily escalate to tier 3 instantly as they would on live even
from relatively low power weapons. Some weapons have very low force, but
have extreme bare wound bonuses. This should be less likely after this
change. I doubt this will necessarily make high damage high wound
weapons like energy swords any less prone to cutting you clean open, but
it might thanks to the reduction to contributed damage to the injury
roll. The system is now _a bit more random_.
## Changelog
🆑
balance: Wounds do not make you as vulnerable to suffering wounds of all
types as before. Instead, wounds make you more vulnerable to suffering
worse versions of themselves as a priority.
balance: Wound armor is now more impactful when protecting you from
wounds when you have already been wounded.
balance: Your head and chest are more difficult to wound until they have
been mangled; either from suffering from a weeping avulsion or a
hairline fracture.
code: Changed the variable for bare_wound_bonus to exposed_wound_bonus
to better explain what that variable is doing.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: Jeremiah <42397676+jlsnow301@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
So
A) Modifying traits pretty self explanatory was a missing check
B) imo given the type of data that can be seen in vv this shouldnt be
exposed to literally anyone with an admin datum especially considering
actually showing it to someone else and editing it is R_admin and
r_varedit
the giant diff is just indentation change
Showing vv to other players is unaffected by this
## Changelog
🆑
fix: fixed some vv issues
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: TiviPlus <572233640+TiviPlus@users.noreply.com>
Co-authored-by: SmArtKar <44720187+SmArtKar@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
Adds VV header for items, letting quick modification of a few of an
item's combat values..
## Why It's Good For The Game
In testing, I find I tweak these values commonly, to test how effective
an item is vs armor, or how strong a new item should be, etc etc. So
having quick access to these might be cool
I thought about adding a few more like throwforce but I didn't want to
clutter it too much
## Changelog
🆑 Melbert
admin: Items now have a header in VV allowing for quicker editing of
combat properties
/🆑
<!-- Write **BELOW** The Headers and **ABOVE** The comments else it may
not be viewable. -->
<!-- You can view Contributing.MD for a detailed description of the pull
request process. -->
## About The Pull Request
Does what it says on the tin. We don't have any "special" sources of
clone damage left in the game, most of them are rather trivial so I
bunched them together into this PR.
Notable things removed:
- Clonexadone, because its entire thing was centered around clone damage
- Decloner gun, it's also centered around cloning damage, I couldn't
think of a replacement mechanic and nobody uses it anyways
- Everything else already dealt clone damage as a side (rainbow knife
deals a random damage type for example), so these sources were removed
<!-- Describe The Pull Request. Please be sure every change is
documented or this can delay review and even discourage maintainers from
merging your PR! -->
## Why It's Good For The Game
Consider the four sources of normal damage that you can get: Brute,
Burn, Toxins and Oxygen. These four horsemen of the apocalypse are very
well put together and it's no surprise that they are in the game, as you
can fit any way of damaging a mob into them. Getting beaten to death by
a security officer? Brute damage. Running around on fire? Burn damage.
Poisoned or irradiated? Toxin damage. Suffocating in space? Brute, burn
and oxygen damage. Technically there's also stamina damage but that's
its own ballpark and it also makes sense why we have a damage number for
it.
Picture this now: We have this cool mechanic called "clone pods" where
you can magically revive dead people with absolute ease. We don't want
it to be for free though, it comes at a cost. This cost is clone damage,
and it serves to restrain people from abusing cloning.
Fast forward time a bit and cloning is now removed from the game. What
stays with us is a damage number that is intrinsically tied to the
context of a removed feature. It was a good idea that we had it for that
feature at the time, but now it just sits there. It's the odd one out
from all the other damage types. You can easily explain why your blade
dealt brute damage, but how are you going to fit clone damage into any
context without also becoming extremely specific?
My point is: **clone damage is conceptually a flawed mechanic because it
is too specific**. That is the major issue why no one uses it, and why
that makes it unworthy of being a damage stat.
Don't take my word for it though, because a while ago we only had a
handful of sources for this damage type in the game. And in most of the
rounds where you saw this damage, it came from only one department. It's
not worthwhile to keep it around as a damage number. People also didn't
know what to do with this damage type, so we currently have two ways of
healing clone damage: Cryotubes as a roundstart way of healing clone
damage and Rezadone, which instantly sets your clone damage to 0 on the
first tick. As a medical doctor, when was the last time you saw someone
come in with clone damage and thought to yourself, "Oh, this person has
clone damage, I cannot wait to heal them!" ?
Now we have replacements for these clone damage sources. Slimes? Slime
status effect that deals brute instead of clone. Cosmic heretics? Random
organ damage, because their mechanics are already pretty fleshed out.
Decloning virus? The virus operated as a "ticking timebomb" which used
cloning damage as the timer, so it has been reworked to not use clone
damage. What remains after all this is now a basically unused damage
type. Every specific situation that used clone damage is now relying on
another damage type. Now it's time to put clone damage to rest once and
for all.
Sure, you can technically add some form of cellular degradation in the
future, but it shouldn't be a damage number. The idea of your cells
being degraded is a cool concept, don't get me wrong, but make it a
status effect or maybe even a wound for that matter.
<!-- Argue for the merits of your changes and how they benefit the game,
especially if they are controversial and/or far reaching. If you can't
actually explain WHY what you are doing will improve the game, then it
probably isn't good for the game in the first place. -->
## Changelog
<!-- If your PR modifies aspects of the game that can be concretely
observed by players or admins you should add a changelog. If your change
does NOT meet this description, remove this section. Be sure to properly
mark your PRs to prevent unnecessary GBP loss. You can read up on GBP
and it's effects on PRs in the tgstation guides for contributors. Please
note that maintainers freely reserve the right to remove and add tags
should they deem it appropriate. You can attempt to finagle the system
all you want, but it's best to shoot for clear communication right off
the bat. -->
🆑
del: Removed clone damage.
del: Removed the decloner gun.
del: Removed clonexadone.
/🆑
<!-- Both 🆑's are required for the changelog to work! You can put
your name to the right of the first 🆑 if you want to overwrite your
GitHub username as author ingame. -->
<!-- You can use multiple of the same prefix (they're only used for the
icon ingame) and delete the unneeded ones. Despite some of the tags,
changelogs should generally represent how a player might be affected by
the changes rather than a summary of the PR's contents. -->
## About The Pull Request
* Makes special byond lists display properly
* Makes images get a preview in the header
* Makes filters display properly
* Make variable value display a bit more robust to errors
* Kills single char vars
## Changelog
🆑
admin: VV can now display the contents of special byond lists like
filters, or client.images
admin: VV on images now displays the image in the header
admin: VV can now display filters and includes their type
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Refactors regenerate organs to be slightly more intelligent in handling
organ changes and replacements.
Noteably:
- We don't remove organs that were modified by the owner; such as
changing out your heart for a cybernetic
- We early break out of the for loop if they aren't supposed to have an
organ there and remove it
- We check for the organ already being correct, and just healing it and
continuing if it is
Also changes the names of some of the organ helpers into snake_case
### Mapping March
Ckey to receive rewards: N/A
## Why It's Good For The Game
## Changelog
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacquerel <hnevard@gmail.com>
## About The Pull Request
Fixes#73276
This is a followup PR from my series of biotype updates. Changed oxyloss
to default to ignoring biotype requirements. Fixes a bug in lung code
that was preventing mobs from suffocating under certain conditions.
~~Now biotype requirements for oxyloss are respected only when `forced`
is set to `FALSE`, which I have done for all applicable reagents. This
is more of a temporary fix for until the damage system gets a refactor
to better accommodate biotypes. @Time-Green and @LemonInTheDark would
know what I mean, we were just talking about this. There is a problem
with `MOB_ORGANIC` being the deafult and this is the ugly workaround.~~
Edit: I felt that oxyloss (which should be renamed to something else at
this point) should have its own flag to check what type of respiration
the mob's lungs can do. Because you can have organic mobs that breathe
different gases. It gets messy when you try to use the same flag for
everything.
So I refactored oxyloss to use a new lung flag, `respiration_type`,
which is automatically set based on the `safe_min_oxygen`,
`safe_min_plasma` etc variables within the lung code. This will allow
for individual lung types to dynamically determine whether they can take
oxyloss from reagents, or any other sources that pass the
`respiration_type` in the `adjustOxyLoss` proc.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Plasmamen can't breathe without plasma anymore. Humans can't breathe
without oxygen anymore. Etc.
Adds better handling for dealing with the 'oxyloss' damage type,
allowing it to be applied based on the type of gas being breathed by the
specific lung. The argumentless default is to apply it regardless of
respiration_type e.g. it behaves exactly as it did before.
## Changelog
🆑
fix: fixes oxyloss not being applied when there is a partial pressure of
0 (no more being able to breathe in space)
code: fixes any lingering damage-application issues related to non
MOB_ORGANIC biotypes
refactor: refactored lungs to have a respiration_type flag which is then
used by adjustOxyloss/setOxyloss to determine whether to take 'oxygen'
damage.
/🆑
I got tired of having to walk new admin candidates through the admin buttons and telling them about all of the antiquated buttons they'd never use, so I'm doing my part and removing a bunch of the transformation bloat from the player panel. Below is the current menu
The only button admins I know ever actually use is the human rudimentary transformation one, and literally nothing else. Judging by how the options are a random choice of some of the station pets, these options probably haven't been updated since like 2012. In addition, the non-rudimentary transformations only work if you're a human, so not sure why they show up for non human player panels.
Here's the new pared down selection, I figured these would be the only useful ones from the bunch. They work no matter what mob the target was previously, whether it be another living mob or a ghost. In addition, I also cut out the transformation equivalents from the VV dropdown, because lord knows that menu keeps getting longer and longer. Lastly, I refactored stuff where possible without getting too trapped in cursed pre-MSO era admincode.
About The Pull Request
Honestly, I'm not sure this is the... Correct solution? But people more familiar with this will likely show me da wae.
Prohibits creating names that can't actually be spoken in-character due to chat filters by adding CHAT_FILTER_CHECKs to the procs that handle sanitising them.
For admin-utilised renaming procs, they'll be given a simple alert box to warn them their chosen name contains words prohibited by the IC chat filter and be allowed to confirm or cancel out.
Why It's Good For The Game
If you can't speak the name IC, chances are the name shouldn't be allowed at all. Players may occasionally be forced to ahelp certain names because they contain words prohibited in chat filters.
* demos (ported from yogstation)
rustg update + write with no format
use external hook for logging
use proper log vars
fix + clarifying comment
don't start the log
release build of rust-g
fix something caught by the lint
Update code/__DEFINES/subsystems.dm
Co-Authored-By: Jordan Brown <Cyberboss@users.noreply.github.com>
Update code/controllers/subsystem/demo.dm
Co-Authored-By: JJRcop <jrubcop@gmail.com>
Update code/controllers/subsystem/demo.dm
Co-Authored-By: JJRcop <jrubcop@gmail.com>
moves hooks out of a dedicated file
len = 0 to Cut(), remove semicolons
untyped loop
* updated rust_g
* 513 updates
About The Pull Request
Adds cancel buttons to input boxes that didn't have them before.
Why It's Good For The Game
Good UX.
Changelog
cl
add: More cancel buttons.
/cl
About The Pull Request
The thing other than ruining maps that I was working on
Refactors VV to use a more standard way of doing topic dropdown options rather than a huge if/else chain
Marking datums is now a right click option
Moves a few files around too/few procs
Why It's Good For The Game
Makes it easier to add more VV dropdown options in the future, and moving href list keys to defines make misspelling them harder.
Changelog
cl
add: Oh yeah also added a "return value of proccall" option for VV var editing.
refactor: View Variables has been refactored. It should now be easier to make VV dropdown options.
/cl
Joshua Kidder
