## About The Pull Request
One of the development hell cycles with mapping is how long it takes to
fix quality or run issues with maps.
By adding a prefix called "maptest_" to some of the unit tests it allows
mappers to only target some tests instead of the usual 350+ tests to run
each time or trying to trigger them individually and faffing.
This does not rename the unit test files themselves to preserve history
but just the "/datum/unit_test/" in each file.
This does not break the current CI or obstruct other tests - A few other
map files that call these tests specifically have been edited to point
at the new datum name.
This assumes you are using the TG testing extension to do this.
| All Tests | maptest_ |
|--------|--------|
| <img width="426" height="106" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d1d6f81e-16bd-473a-88da-e8b56f8bd3d0"
/> | <img width="434" height="96" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ea1c47fe-a6ce-40c6-b2cb-65b9c8e94a29"
/> |
| <img width="360" height="886" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/65bcd774-79ad-432e-8211-c67fb9d3e443"
/> | <img width="370" height="833" alt="Screenshot 2025-10-01 204609"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ad360796-5698-42fd-bd2e-51de1a02ab87"
/> |
## Why It's Good For The Game
- Should make it easier for mappers to test locally, saving CI/Github
resource for TG
- Mappers can now test their work 56% faster
## Changelog
🆑
code: Mappers can now run just mapping unit tests - Should be 56% faster
- Should have no player impact
/🆑
Co-authored-by: loganuk <falseemail@aol.com>
About The Pull Request
Separated compiling the integration tests and running them as separate steps for organization purposes.
Added a TEST_ASSERT_NULL(value, reason) and TEST_ASSERT_NOTNULL(value, reason) because those are conceptually simple tests.
Makes the PASS and FAIL prefixes in the integration test log be green and red for better readability.
Failure reasons now display the file and line number.
In order to achieve this, direct calls to Fail() are now wrapped in a macro, TEST_FAIL(), as Fail() itself needs preprocessor stuff passed to it.
In the midst of updating it, I noticed multiple cases of tests directly calling Fail() and returning when they should have used a better macro, so those were updated. There was at least one case where it appeared that the code assumed that the test ended at Fail(), but made no attempt to do so, such as with the RCD test.
Feel free to double check all of the changed unit tests in case I made a functional behavior change, but they currently pass.
To take advantage of the previous change, failures are now marked as annotations. Note that outside of github, this creates an ugly-looking line but the primary environment is as a github action.
Examples with intentionally botched unit test:
image
image
image
Why It's Good For The Game
Makes inspecting failed unit tests significantly easier.
Changelog
N/A
SimplyLogan