* Makes flags properly check themselves
Byond ref: https://www.byond.com/docs/ref/#/operator/&
Basically, flags should use & instead of ==
We can have more than 1 slot on any item, so it's preferred that we do this instead. Even if it doesn't immediately fix any problems, it's something that should be the standard anyways to prevent it from ever being a problem.
Co-authored-by: MrMelbert <51863163+MrMelbert@users.noreply.github.com>
* Basic outline for Bartender RCD
* Alphabetically sorted drink and booze dispenser reagent lists
* Added soda/booze synthesizers to the service plumbing constructor
* name change
* Syntax Error fixing
* Name and research updates
* Updated constructor selection
* Mixing chamber sister class
* brewery RCD redo again
* Custom Mixing Chamber UI
* Finalized plumbing reskins
* Allowed the service techfab to print chemical recipient boards
* added test sprites and removed un-needed renames
* Last Rename
* leftover whitespace fixes
* more whitespace removal
* one more name update
* refactor for upstream
* fixing TGUI i broke
* last whitespace fix
* last last whitespace fix
* please have this fix the whitespace
* updated doc comments
* updated ui_data and ui_act procs make more sense
* Update code/modules/plumbing/plumbers/reaction_chamber.dm
Co-authored-by: lex <alexdpow@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Seth Scherer <supernovaa41@gmx.com>
* destroy proc holder pt1
- change proc_holder/spell to action/cooldown/spell
- docs all the spell vars, renames some of them
- removes some useless vars
- start with pointed spells, as they're easy
* kill proc_holder pt2
- kill a buncha vars and replace it with flags
- convert a ton over
- general code improvements
* kill proc_holders pt3
- convert a good few more spells
- rename some signals
- handle statpanel
- better docs
* kiill proc_holder pt4:
- restructure the file system of action.dm, separating a good amount of item actions and miscellaneous garbage into files where they belong slightly better. Also splits off item actions, cooldown actions, innate actions, etc. into their own files, overlal making it much better to work with
- converts touch attacks to actions
- converts blood crawl, jaunt subtype
* kills proc_holder pt5
- clears up some icon issues so all the currently converted pages don't have errors
- shapeshift
- some more action cleanup
* kills proc_holder pt5.5:
- some documentation
- reworks feedback to prevent oversight with teleports and stuff
* kills proc_holder pt6:
- converted cult spells
- converted magic missile
- converted mime spells
- chipped away at the errors
- removed some vars which were too general, replaced them with more locally applicable vars. for example "range" which could mean "projectile range" or "aoe radius" or whatever - instead of having a broad net which everyone applies to in a confusing matter, instead lets each spell delegate on their own.
- merged magic/spell and magic/aoe, as the comment intended
- more unified behavior for spell levelling
* kill proc_holders pt 6.5:
- replacing a buncha old proc_holders that have been updated to reduce some errors. sub 900 baby
* kills proc_holder pt 6.75:
- minor fixes
* kills proc_holder pt7:
- cuts down on some errors
- refactors some wiz events
* kills proc_holder pt 7.5:
- malf ranged modules
- some minor errors
* kills proc_holder pt 7.75:
- mor eminor error handling, cleaning up changes
* kill proc_holder pt8:
- refactors spell book
- refactors spell implant
- some more minor error fixing
* kill proc_holder pt 8.5:
- scan ability
* Adds some robust documentation
* kill proc_holder pt9:
- converts some / most mutations over
* kill proc_holder pt10:
- sort out all the granters
- refactor them slightly
- fix some compile errors
* Some set-unset sanity - going to need to test removing Share()
* Removes transfer actions. It doesn't seem to do anything.
- Transfer_actions was called when current = new_character so locially speaking the early return in Grant() should cause it to NOOP. Test this in the future though
* Removes sharing from actions, docs actions better
* Some better documentation for spell and spell components
* Kills proc_holder pt11:
- Finally finishes ALL THE SPELLS IN THE SPELL FOLDER
- Fixes some more errors
* kills proc_holder pt11.5:
- minor error fixing and sanity
* Method of sharing actions. Can be improved in the future, needs testing
* Implements a way to update the stat panel entry for a spell. Also gets rid of VV stuff, as you can update the bigflags directly in VV now.
* Curse of madness bug I put in.
* kills proc_holder pt12:
- sub 500 errors!
- converts cytology mobs
- converts and refactors spiders slightly
- some minor fixing around the place as usual
* kill proc_holder pt13
- Finishes heretic spells
- Sub 300 errors!
- some touch refactoring to account for mansus grasp
* kills proc_holder pt14:
- revenant
- minor bugfixing for heretic stuff
* kills proc_holder pt14.5:
- some missed stuff for revenant + heretic
* kills proc_holder pt15:
- alien abilities
- more minor fixing
- sub 100 errors. The end is nigh
* kill proc_holder pt16? 17:
- Finishes cult spells
- sub 50 errors!
- refactors the way charge works
- renames / moves some signals
* kills proc_holder pt final:
- sdql spells
- no more errors!
* Bugfixes round 1
* Various bugfixing
- documentation done
- give spell works
- can cast spell gives feedback conditionally
- is available takes into account casting ability
* Some accidental reversions + fixes
* Unit tests
* Completely refactors jaunting
- All bloodcrawling is now handled on the action itself instead of across various living procs
- slaughter demons have their own blood crawls
- jaunting dummies don't have side effects on destroy() anymore
* Wizard spell logging and even more refactoring
* [DRAFT] Reformats Access IDs for accessibility and futureproofing
* replaced all the old defines and IDs everywhere
* replaced ID integers with strings, cleaned up a couple tram helpers
* replaces req_access_txt with req_access and fixes a few of my mistakes
Co-authored-by: san7890 <the@san7890.com>
This PR covers 4 Key features:
Price Rebalancing
Passive Income
Gas Exports
Lathe Tax
Relevant Design Doc (Slightly out of date as a result of the discourse on the subject).
https://hackmd.io/WlWgyRafTaiAqz6ouOqC-Q
-- START DOCUMENT --
# Arconomy Version Two
This is mostly me organizing a long list of thoughts that I'm not sure if I can properly describe and get across, but lets just work with what we got and go from there.
## There should probably be a relationship to time and profit
So, part one of a series called "Arcane was completely wrong about game design", I made a rather large misstep in regards to designing arconomy, and nobody told me this until far, FAR after I had gone way too in on my own ideas:
"There needs to be a relationship between time and money". Because Space Station 13 is a game that is built around rounds, either long, LONG rounds on MRP or 30 min - 1 hour long rounds in LRP, your whole orientation of the game is built around time. The longer you spend in a single round, the more you can do and mold the station and the game in a specific direction, whether it's from an admin event, doing your job, or going off on a wierd character based tangent.
The issue here lies in a question I tried to answer in my previous design doc:
> "Command players start with lots of money, and make mountains of money, and as a result, have so much money by the end of the shift that they're practically immune to the effects of the economy.
> Assistant players start out with practically no money, find that the station is covered in costs that they'll never be able to practically afford, and decide that the economy is stupid and not worth utilizing altogether."
Two fundimentally different outlooks on the same problem, caused by the pay discrepency as it existed originally. Since we have so many different jobs all at different paygrades, the option that made the most sense at the time was to completely remove paychecks alltogether because they would multiplicitively exacerbate the previous issue.
While it would flood the in-game economy over time at high levels, it did add a sense of timescale to the existing in-game relationships. You **KNEW** that after x many minutes you would get that fancy hat, or that you would need to find cash in other ways to get it. Having that time-scale is helpful as we've moved to our 90 minute round average/goal. It also, similarly, means that we know exactly how many credits each job SHOULD have had access to before a major disaster calls for a shuttle call. But, in hindsight, that is a value that should be consistant for all players. If a single, unaided player looks at a 200 credit bill, that should have the same impact player to player, and not limit their access to jobs.
## Bounties just ain't that fun, but they stand to see improvement from where they are now
So, guilty as charged, bounty running doesn't quite have the same charm as it used to have. For our friends just joining us, cargo used to have a single, per round laundry list of items that would payout to the cargo budget each shift. Each list would start with 10 items, one of which would randomly be assigned higher priority with a higher payout, and it would be cargo's job to ~~Break into each department and steal that thing~~ cooperate with jobs around the station to aquire funds for station crisis or when you just want to dick around and make stacks of cash. This had a distinct charm to it, but one element of it that majorly reduced the replayability of bounties was that they were severely limited in scope. Once you did your ONE drink bounty or your ONE chemical bounty, you no longer needed to interact with that department.
My original goal was this: Make an unlimited bounty system, where crewmates were able to get a cut of their work as profit. To a degree, it's fairly successful! Crew do have a way to actively work with cargo to get paid for their labor, and they help cargo as a result by giving them free valuables. The issue lies in the fact that this has kinda flipped the relationship on it's head: Bounties stopped being cargo's job to outsource to the crew, and instead the crew's job that becomes dependent on cargo.
In general, many bounties simply weren't meant to be repeatable content in the first place. And certainly not meant to be used for every job. Offloading it as a kind of fetchquest minigame so that all jobs can offset the loss of passive income? It's not the best choice. For jobs like botanists or scientists it's tolerable at best, frustrating at worst. Just look at the state of things like experisci-slime experiments or scanning furniture.
It gets far worse when it's from the perspective of jobs that have *explicitly* limited supplies like security. No, a security player is not going to be allowed to haul away all the good metal handcuffs from the brig for a bounty, and no, you cannot take all the riot shotguns from the brig.
Now, a few of these things were fixed over time, with mixed successes. Bounties started to be cleaned up in order to prevent limited quantity items from being an option for repeat bounties. Jobs that lack exports started to get some content for still allowing them to have repeatable exports (Like the Scanners for Security Officers to go on patrols).
The BIG EXCEPTION to this is Restaurant Bots, but we'll hit that in a second.
## Getting everything on the same price scale has been a major improvement.
Unironically one of the best changes made has been the idea that even if we lack that good time-credit scale from before, we didn't really have a "standard" to work off of when something new is added to the game and the dev needs to determine how much to make that thing cost. That's why the current costs of objects and values on-station are scaled off of a single define, the value of a crate sold on the cargo shuttle.
> Yes, I'd like an APPLE. It's worth 3124151 CREDITS. NO, I don't know why the apple juice in the vendor is worth 415 CREDITS, nor do I CARE, GOOD MAN.
From the back end, everything is scaled off the same define now. Paygrades are defined off of a different scale still, but that's fine. You know, from the cargo end of things, that a cargo player needs to ship off X number of empty metal crates to purchase a laser crate, or a pizza crate. Definate relationships help in solidifying the singular value of a product.
If we decide that we want to rescale the in-game economy and provide space credits with more granularity, at least we know we can do it with a single line of code, and not looking at every single instance of something that charges the player money.
### Arconomy Tangent: We gotta nuke gas selling.
This has been a long time coming and I know people are going to be upset at me, but look man.
I have no idea how selling moles of gas works these days. It seems like with minimal resources, true atmos wizards are able to make singular cans of gasses with infinite moles of some kind of gas, and if it's exotic enough, they can make upwards of a million credits a can. I've seen multiple occasions where selling gas cans to cargo has allowed for players to buy a bike.
For our Gen-Z zoomers reading this, players were never meant to BUY the bike. The bike is just a reskinned scooter meant as a cute little pokemon joke. If a player can actually buy a bike in a round, that's a sign that someone, somewhere, fucked up.
We fucked up the whole system with atmos gas selling.
We've now gone through metas of extracting miasma from lavaland for credits, we've gone through a meta where cargo starts building their own hydrogen burn chambers for simply produced gasses, we've seen time and time again that processed gasses in the funny space simulator just tends to be abused to death and back. I've had talks with TheFinalPotato on this in the past, and it just feels like a system that would need to be rewritten from the ground up, or looked at in terms of the whole cargo department. If I don't get to it first, the next cargo design doc someone writes **SHOULD**.
## Giving jobs content that integrates into the economy can be really fun.
Tourism bots and the baked in ingredient shopping is fun! It's enabled for a fluff job that doesn't have too terribly much by way of serious responsibilites to integrate active income minigames into the gameplay of chefs and bartenders. It's fully optional, it's quick, and it's not even a full shift investment.
These secondary tasks, which utilize jobs core gameplay loops in a new way, while rewarding them within the in-game economy are a decent way to keep players engaged with their jobs, and allow for them to use credits as a player resource as well as a primary job resource.
**I AM NOT SAYING** that all jobs need to find tasks to arbitrarily reward players with credits for. The reason it works so well for jobs like the chef or bartender is because their job is already to make food and drinks, but they have so many options that they're not encouraged to make too wide of a variety of food, especially when botanists won't always make everything you need. The food market gives them an outlet to buy outlier ingredients and the tourists pay handsomely enough that you can offset your costs most or the time.
I'll break this down as well into the three different methods of money-making in game as well, to guide someone on how to make good, secondary income content.
| Primary | Secondary | Tertiary |
| -------- | -------- | -------- |
| This is something like passive paycheck income. You get this just purely for playing the game, and staying alive. | This is an active trade off between your job's specific content, where you are trading your time for something it is directly your responsibility to do. Eg. Tourist Bots. | An active task you are performing for income, but lacks the specialization of a job. EG. Bounties. |
Jobs that excell at more service based tasks and less production based tasks should aim to aquire more seconary style economy integration, like medical, science, or security.
## The options for moving money around the station are actually pretty decent, but could be streamlined
Bounty boards are pretty decent at being a way to pay crew members for single service jobs. However, bounty boards are pretty much dead content, in a sense. There's not much incentive to hunt down your department's bounty board.
Similarly, most crew would just prefer to hand credits out by hand to prevent most kinds of abuse of their own credit supply.
Long term and certainly a major personal outcome I'd like to see: Bounty boards and Newscasters should be merged together. Newscasters have some truely awful spaghetti and their being held together by shoe-strings and duct tape (This is slang for HTML). Bounty boards are... well they're functional, but they have the benefit of being built in TGUI. Merging the two's functions should cut down on wall-space, as well as improve the quality of a vast deal of code, and make money transfer on station slightly easier.
Honestly, pretty happy with vend-a-trays. They're pretty decent store-machines on station and do their job pretty well when they get used. All in all I'm happy with how they work.
Custom Vendors are clunky to a fairly major degree and I don't think most players get how to make them work on account of need a price tagger (not a sales tagger, that's the cargo item) to mark an object for it's sale value, then load it into a custom vendor sales unit, then load it into a custom vending machine, and that's only IF custom vending machines decide to work this year. Streamlining the tools, or perhaps just vending machines would certainly improve this as a service.
## Just ain't enough cool stuff to buy with credits.
An ever-present problem, that we're just kinda stuck with. There's a decent number of issues involved with making content that can safely be gated with just credits.
* If it's usable as a weapon, is it too dangerous to hand out to the crew at large?
* Does security get potential oversight?
* If it's illegal, does it go through cargo?
* Does it HAVE to go through cargo?
* If it's beneficial, is it going to invalidate the existance of a job? (Think old medkits!)
* Is there anything that players WANT that's not a weapon, benefical to the station but not too strong, or quite literally traitor equipment?
It's a tough question.
Some items make complete sense to implement on a per job basis as either uncommon or premium equipment, while other items could potentially be moved to station-wide unique purchasables.
# Takeaways:
Look, these are just some possible solutions that I'm considering. I think that working alongside a maintainer who could actually give a damn on getting this system orderly and possibly alligned with our current design philosophy (Who also understands that a not-insignificant amount of current economy was abitrarly written by goofball an actual decade ago) could help iron this out into a clear and consise set of goals and milestones to make the in-game economy workable. Not balanced, but workable.
* **Design a simple simulation for per round intake and outtake, to determine benchmark values for a 90 minute round.**
It would need to look something like this, as a kind of fucked up, Multi-Input Multi-Output Control Problem. Possibly could be done in simulink, but I'm not quite sure how to do that at this moment, so a less complex version might be fine.
* **Look back at implementing crewmember incomes, but at a flat, more consistant rate over all jobs**
My leading idea: 50 credit, uniform paygrade. No wild, unscaled pay rates based on what job is "important" or not.
That line of thinking means that certain jobs should have more expensive equipment over other jobs, but then we're right back to the captain thinking that a cup of coffee is practically free where an assistant thinks that a screwdriver from the vendor is going to put them out of house and home.
Improves time-relationship values with credits.
This could lead way to heads of staff having some degree of control to giving raises or paycuts to crew-members, but perhaps at a very, VERY gradual rate.
* **Perform another big-picture look at bounty cubes.**
Potentially try to put bounties back in the hands of cargo, while still providing payouts to crewmates who assist in completing jobs. This may require some minor refactoring of the pricetag component, perhaps to even allow for multiple crewmembers to recieve profit from a payout.
This means once again, look at making bounties workable for all jobs on the station, not making the objects requested literal lathe-fodder, and finding ways to benefit the station in some way with the task of bounty cubes, even if it's just for credits.
Deceptively hard task.
* **Add secondary tasks that integrate the economy into non-bounty-able jobs/departments**
Like it says on the tin, look into ways to add content that improves economy integration into existing jobs, without necessarily changing what those jobs DO. The bounties for those jobs can still exist as a tertiary thing, but should be made clear that they're... tertiary.
Chefs still make food and bartenders still serve drinks, but they have a way to hand them out for fun and profit.
Some thoughts and ways to handle this potentially:
*Science:* Perform intricate testing on anomalous materials using science equipment. Should NOT REWARD RESEARCH POINTS. Mr. OJ Headcoder will CHEMICALLY CASTRATE me, or you, if you do.
*Medical:* Complete tricky or non-standard surgeries on dummies for medical data. Think like that meme from the TV show, House.
"He needs Mouse bites to live. MORE MOUSE BITES."
*Engineering:* Repair wacky machines that use both station-standard parts as well as solving quick puzzles.
* **Look into more effective money sinks that are dynamic sensitive**
Think, for example, about the station ransom event that spawns space pirates.
What if instead of the captain just dumping credits from the cargo budget into the aether to prevent pirate spawns (They're bugged anyway to my knowledge to spawn anyway), crewmates had to cough up that dough before a time-limit, or risk a pirate spawn. For those of you who were scratching their heads at (Operational Costs!?) in the above controls diagram, this is the sort of thing I mean.
Little, smaller things that might need to be purchased, invested in, or otherwise drain credits from the station over the course of the round.
# Arconomy 2.0: Smarter, Better, Flashier.
## Roundstart
Players begin each shift with a set amount of money, with the value being mostly uniform over the course of a shift assuming no interaction with economy. Jobs are split up into only 3 paygrades, Minimal, Crew, and Command. Minimal is reserved for jobs that are meant to fill population counts but lack a specialization, like prisoner and assistant. When starting the shift, a player will start with 5 paychecks worth of savings. This system is not designed for persistance, so you will always be able to tell how much money a player starts out with. Every 5 minutes, aka every economy tick, the player will recieve one paycheck, which is capped out at the standard crew member paycheck. This means that even if you start the shift as the captain, and begin the shift with 500 credits, you will recieve the same 50 credits as regular crew members.
| Minimal Paycheck | Crew Paycheck | Command Paycheck | Frequency |
| -------- | -------- | -------- |--------|
| 125 Cr | 250 Cr | 500 Cr | Roundstart |
| 25 Cr | 50 Cr | 50 Cr | Passive Income |
## Product Prices
Products found in vending machines are defined by the amount of a player's paycheck they're meant to cost. Regular items use the PAYCHECK_CREW value, while more expensive or otherwise prohibitive items are defined by PAYCHECK_COMMAND. Items are defined in this uniform, horizontal fashion in order to maintain the equal value of credits over all jobs. A 100 credit medkit in medical should have the same value to a doctor as it does to a botanist.
Jobs apply a discount to vending within their own department, so an engineering would have a discount on tools, and a doctor would have a discount on sutures. Items that are important to gameplay progression in a role are less expensive to their intended users.
> **AUTHORS NOTE:** I am considering removing in-department discounts. In the benefit of making the value of purchasables more universal, deciding that credits shouldn't be spent within their own department just seems... rather fucking stupid.
> Possibly move the discount to only the first few minutes of the shift, or perhaps as some kind of gameplay benefit to slowly increase in-department discount through gameplay milestones? Who knows 👻
>
Some jobs have premium, high value items stocked in their vending machines that are not meant to be purchased at roundstart. These are meant to encourage players to save or combine resources to gain access. An example of this is insulated gloves. Other high value items can also be found in contraband through hacking vending machines. This remains unchanged.
## Markets
The cargo department has been changed in order to improve player involvement with the economy, as well as to give cargo more variety in their merchandise while preventing a singular stale meta of products to purchase from.
Yes, I'm looking at you, russian surplus crate.
Lets start with what's remaining the same:
* Cargo is a department that manages imports and exports of products, fulfilling departmental orders, and aquiring supplies dependent on the station's state.
* Cargo encompasses the station's mail, mining, and flow of orders, as well as drone exploration.
* A skilled cargo member is able to find high value items to sell back to centcom in exchange for more funds, to purchase those supplies.
* Centcom may request bounties which crew can fulfill in exchange for credits, if they wish for additional work.
**Now for the new design flow:**
Cargo starts out with a new mechanic called a market. Markets hold existing export datums as well as purchasable products. The values of items will fluxuate up and down based on the market status, with in-game events or player actions raising or lowering the values of specific markets.
At roundstart, cargo has a single market to sell to, which is Nanotransen. This will not incapsulate all the existing export datums in the game, just the *primary* exports that are used by players. Items that are exclusive to nanotrasen and required to play certain game modes, like mindshield implants or being able to sell crates, are included and will always be available to purchase.
Additional markets can be unlocked through gameplay sources, such as:
| Market Name | Source | Imports/Exports |
| -------- | -------- |- |
| The Syndicate | Emagging/Hacking the Console | Illegal Goods/Contraband |
| The Clown Planet Commerse | Discovering the clown planet ruin | Pies, Horns, Pranking Equipment |
|Terragov Sector Security Surplus | Killing any megafauna. | Weapons, Ammunition, Advanced Riot Gear. |
| Mekki Materials Co. | Recovered loot from Exodrones | Materials and industrial equipment. |
|Donk Co.| As a tip from tourist robots. | Foods and Drinks, Toys and Games.|
|Waffle Co.| As above. | Bootleg products and wacky merchandise. |
|The Research Consortium| Reward for completing any experiment tree. | Slime Cores, RnD Artifacts, Robotics Equipment |
...And more, if I can think of more.
The purpose being, of course, to split up cargo's purchasable goods to be more instanced and unique, while also create unique situations where due to profitable markets, very specific exports are needed to help the department make money.
End of document for now :@ArcaneMusic
-- END DOCUMENT
Price Shifting
So, in-game items that have prices have a major issue on their hands, being that they were decided by how much money that job should make. This means that many of the jobs in-game have been given prices scaled to their job's income. That income I adjusted by removing passive income in #54161. While this was helpful to moving towards an active in-game economy, it resulted in items falling into distinct price brackets. A high paying job like security's items could never be purchased by someone like a botanist, but a job like a security officer had more capital and buying power than most other jobs in-game combined when moving down those brackets. We've done a simple normalization of scale to help in bring things closer to a semblance of equality.
There are now 3 price brackets, PAYCHECK_LOW, PAYCHECK_CREW, and PAYCHECK_COMMAND. Command staff will still have a higher base level of money on-hand than other crew, and low paying wages that we on-station don't respect as being real jobs (assistant, prisoner) will have their items be intentionally cheaper to encourage active participation in the economy, but the difference in scale is now noticeably far closer to each other. This means that assistants can still interact with the economy as spenders, but if they want to be doing a lot of work with money, they'll need to put in work. Additionally, this means we arbitrarily enforce a system that allows for items to have uniformity in what they cost to other players. 50 credits for a wrench feels better when you know that other job critical items in-game are also around the same price, and it's equivalent to one paycheck.
Paychecks are reintroduced
Economy lost it's relationship to time. In a game where a single round takes 90+ minutes (Backed up not only by the head-coder's design direction as well as plenty of aggregate round data), having a relationship to time and how long it takes to afford something is a major consideration when you look at buying something. Also, we get to say that I was certifiably wrong in regards to the active economy thing, since we have very, VERY few active sources of content in-game that are very... fun? Bounties are literal fetch quests but something like tourists is at least more engaging and interactive with the round, and should be the direction we want economy-job integration to head in.
Between having inflation as a price manipulation mechanic already in the code, as well as prices being roughly equalized in terms of their costs between jobs and their impact on the round, this allows for the reintroduction of paychecks to an extent.
As an additional note, doing this meant tweaking down the syndicate briefcase of cash, so that instead of giving you 5000 credits for 1 TC, it now costs 5 TC to accompany the fact that this is now a rather significant amount of money, even on decently high population. Fun fact: the Syndicate Briefcase of Cash actually PREDATES the economy, and was NEVER ADJUSTED beyond the original implementation of the economy as a result!
Gas Exports.
ALRIGHT ARE YOU READY FOR SOME GRAPHS? I THOUGHT SO, YOU LOVE GRAPHS.
So, gas exports are fucked, have always been fucked, and consistently have proven to be capable of breaking the in-game economy for a long time. This is no secret, I've been pinged with players getting billions, actual billions of credits using it multiple times in as many years. See, any round where a player manages to buy the bicycle is a round where I've fucked up, or someone fucked and I let it get past me.
So here's how gas exports work right now.
So, all of this hinges on the value of a single mole of gas, and some gasses enable you to make extremely, EXTREMELY profitable gasses through atmospheric gas wizardry However, even those less profitable gasses are still in an extremely high magnitude of value.
Most gasses if you have a full can of it will net you OVER 10k credits. For scale, one crate being sold in cargo is 200 credits.
That's a minimum of crates for pumping gas into a hollow metal box and praying it doesn't explode.
So we adjusted the values accordingly.
The baseline value of a single gas has been tweaked downward significantly. Even these values are still arguably very high, but I can play with it at the discretion of LemonintheDark. The green line at the top represents gasses that previously sold for 100 credits per mole, antinobilium I believe, and working downwards. I am going to try and enforce 10 credits per mole as the absolute maximum hard cap on gas exports, regardless of how many gasses we try to add in the future. Because the alternative is getting a gunjillion credits by huffing miasma into a tank of steel. And we ain't having that shit.
Lathe Tax
Part of the testing for this PR involved me modeling the SS13 economy in a given round as a kind of controls problem, with each source of income introduced in the round as a kind of input (Passive Income, Bounties, Tourists) in order to get a handle on roughly how much income a single round of SS13 will see per player on the given designed round-length, in order to estimate how much things are going to cost. Modeling how much players spend on a given round is variable enough that it'd be too difficult to accurately test without just throwing this up on a server and getting live data.
However, from the appearance of my dataset, players would be making a LOT more money nowadays with all of the above changes implemented. In an attempt to curve that intake, I attempted to implement a small, low scale tax of printing items that would take a small amount of players income every time they print, as a way to add a basic economic side-effect to this mechanic.
This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a mixed decision. So, maintainers came up with an intended direction they want to see it, as they wanted to make sure that economy would remain a secondary system, that could still have an impact on round direction and the changes they want to see in the game.
So, here's the intent:
Lathe tax should exist in the form of printing things from protolathes outside of your department, not on autolathes or your own protolathe.
We want to promote people talking and collaborating to access things if it's outside the scope of their department and they still want it, with theft still being a viable avenue of gameplay.
Players will be charged 10 credits for printing a set of items not from their own protolathe, each. Printing an item can be paid for from your own ID card's bank account automatically, but the payment component has been buffed to handle physical money alternatives, as well as pulled money, similar to the luxury shuttle scanner gate's behavior.
Borgs are still enabled to print from lathes, however instead of it costing them credits, they now take a self-significant power cost in order to do so, preventing them from being used as a roving bank account for printing. I'll look into this further as we don't want to invalidate mechanics like borgs being able to do organ based surgery or building machinery, but we don't want them to become credit cards, so place that under advisement.
Tweaks and Updates:
(Suggested by Ziiro) If the revolutionaries win, centcom will no longer enforce the Lathe Tax.
(Suggested by about ~1000 people independently between my DMs, Reddit threads, the Feedback Thread, and elsewhere)
Printing items only taxes you once per print. EG: If you print 10 Kitchen Knifes as an assistant from the service lathe, you will only be charged once instead of 10 times.
For many of the reasons that I outlined above, this is a good change in a positive direction.
Players get more ability to interact with the economy without having to do content that's becoming increasingly depreciated in my absence.
Players also have a baseline consensus on what values of credits are high and low because jobs have been given an equalized standard in regards to the cost of certain items.
Price fluctuations through inflation will now be more meaningful in situations where the economy becomes more relevant.
The system will still encourage you to play a job that's productive to the status of the station through lower paycheck jobs existing as well.
Gas exports are now reduced to the point that their value is appropriate for the first time... actually ever. Nice.
The values of nearly every item purchasable by players has been rebalanced.
Players will now start with less starting money, but will receive a paycheck once every 5 minutes.
The value of gasses exported through the cargo department have been skewed way, WAY down in terms of price.
The Syndicate briefcase of cash now contains now costs 5 TC, up from 1 TC, for 5000 credits.
Printing items from lathes on station now costs a fee of 10 credits per item printed if it's from a lathe not under your department.
The payment component has received additional handling for physical credits, as well as pulled credits/ID cards for those without hands.
If you click a bag with an RCD nothing happends, this fixes it. Not sure if this is the best way to fix it since im not that experienced but i playtested it and it works. Tell me if i need to change anything.
Implements the Modernizing radiation design document ( https://hackmd.io/@tgstation/rJNIyeBHt ) and replaces the current radiation sources with the new system, as well as replacing/removing a bunch of old consumers of radiation that either had no reason to exist, or could be replaced by something else.
Diverges from the doc in that items radiation don't go up like explained. I was going to, but items get irradiated so easily that it just feels pretty lame. Items still get irradiated, but it's mostly just so that radiation sources look cooler (wow, lots of stuff around going green), and for things like the geiger counter.
Instead of the complicated radiation_wave system, radiation now just checks everything between the radiation source and the potential target, losing power along the way based on the radiation insulation of whats in between. If this reaches too low a point (specified by radiation_pulse consumers), then the radiation will not pass. Otherwise, will roll a chance to irradiate. Uranium structures allow a delay before irradiating, so stay away!
## About The Pull Request
stop forgetting to include mapload, if you don't include it then every single subtype past it by default doesn't include it
for example, `obj/item` didn't include mapload so every single item by default didn't fill in mapload
## Regex used:
procs without args, not even regex
`/Initialize()`
procs with args
`\/Initialize\((?!mapload)((.)*\w)?`
cleanup of things i didn't want to mapload:
`\/datum\/(.)*\/Initialize\(mapload`
Makes it so that the RCD attack chain stops after pre_attack
where the RCD for example replaces an lattice in in pre_attack which then causes a runtime in the attackby code.
It seems like all of the RCD stuff is handled pre_attack so it should be fine to stop the chain here.
The RCD also has the NOBLUDGEON flag meaning you can't attack with it anyways.
Title. Because of mob and object visuals under open space being able to be hovered over with the cursor and examined and in general acting as entities distint from the turf holding them it tends to be hard or even impossible to build floor and catwalks over these turfs. This PR aims to fix it with a basically simple, more-convenient-than-a-painstaking-refactor and easy to apply element (edit: and proc).
This makes it so during unit tests, adding a text based overlay to something will runtime if the icon does not have an icon state matching that text. I would do this during normal compiles as well but getting the icon states from an icon is surprisingly expensive.
Co-authored-by: LemonInTheDark <58055496+LemonInTheDark@users.noreply.github.com>
Converts most spans into span procs. Mostly used regex for this and sorted out any compile time errors afterwards so there could be some bugs.
Was initially going to do defines, but ninja said to make it into a proc, and if there's any overhead, they can easily be changed to defines.
Makes it easier to control the formatting and prevents typos when creating spans as it'll runtime if you misspell instead of silently failing.
Reduces the code you need to write when writing spans, as you don't need to close the span as that's automatically handled by the proc.
(Note from Lemon: This should be converted to defines once we update the minimum version to 514. Didn't do it now because byond pain and such)
Does what it says on the tin! I've noticed that the Rapid Service Fabricator and the science/chemistry plumbing devices had no in-hand sprites, and decided "screw it" and made some for them!
New sprites, especially for things that exist but have no in-hands, is awesome!
* Adds explosion SFX to the blastcannon and explosive compressor
- Extracts the explosion SFX and screenshake proc from the SSexplosions explosion handling proc and lets the explosive compressor and blastcannon use it.
* Miscellaneous changes
- Adds defines for the internal explosion arglist keys
- Reverses the values of the explosion severity defines
- Changes almost everything that uses `/proc/explosion` to use named arguments
- Removes a whole bunch of argname = 0 in explosion calls.
* Removes named callback arguments.
* Changes the explosion signals to just use the arguments list
Adds a simple framework to let objects respond to explosions occurring inside of them.
Changes a whole bunch of explosions to use the object being exploded as the origin of the explosion rather than the turf the object is on.
Makes the explosive compressor and blastcannon actually use the TTVs they are given.
Adds support for things responding to internal explosions.
Less snowflake code for the explosive compressor and blastcannon calculating bomb range.*
Less confusing explosion severity defines.
Less opaque explosion arguments
*does not guarantee that the solution to letting them actually use the TTV is any less snowflake.
Adds a multilayer plumbing manifold, I also murdered the multilayer duct
You can now alt-click the plumbing RCD to change the layer it prints. I made a whole thing where right clicking changed the settings and you could use that to change machinery aswell. I even did that with the plunger, it was absolutely beautiful. Anyway that drained the life out of me because apparently there's no attack_obj_secondary and afterattack_secondary ALSO called attack_obj (left click). I just hate whoever made it with intensity
Plumbing now uses three layers. They should be easier to navigate. I tried to make layer connecting the same as cross-color connecting, but that would take more of my soul then there is to take
Currently does four things:
The reaction chamber now supports purity! It has a yellow (acid) and green (basic) input for buffers, aswell as a setting to automatically dispense either an acidic or alkalic buffer when above/below a certain pH! Now you can make a 100% pure meth factory! The buffer connects are on an alternate layer.
Probably going to be less loved, but I removed the reaction chambers ability to pick reagents from the net. Instead, it will pull untill a set volume is reached. Then it'll start reacting. While this means that players will have to be more creative and use a wider array of machinery.
Also new machine! Buffers! They fill the hole that reagent chambers left. They can be set with a threshold volume and will only start putting out chems when ALL of their neighbouring buffers also are also above this threshold. You might have a lot of one chem and have to wait for a more specialized chem to be produced, and with the cleverness of reaction chambers gone, bufferers can do just that: wait.
I also removed all but two layers. I want to make it obvious what layer the buffer connects are on. Also layers are basically unusable and I'm gonna give them a rework very soon. I'll put the things back in then when they actually have something to contribute
moves ammo icons, projectile icons and hitscan effect icons to guns folder
renames projectile.dmi to ballistic.dmi so its less confusing
moves rcd ammo from ammo.dmi to tools.dmi with the rcd
Creates update_name and update_desc
Creates the wrapper proc update_appearance to batch update_name, update_desc, and update_icon together
Less non-icon handling code in update_icon and friends
Signal hooks for things that want to change names and descriptions
99%+ of the changes in this are just from switching everything over to update_appearance from update_icon
Done using this command sed -Ei 's/(\s*\S+)\s*\t+/\1 /g' code/**/*.dm
We have countless examples in the codebase with this style gone wrong, and defines and such being on hideously different levels of indentation. Fixing this to keep the alignment involves tainting the blames of code your PR doesn't need to be touching at all. And ultimately, it's hideous.
There are some files that this sed makes uglier. I can fix these when they are pointed out, but I believe this is ultimately for the greater good of readability. I'm more concerned with if any strings relied on this.
Hi codeowners!
Co-authored-by: Jared-Fogle <35135081+Jared-Fogle@users.noreply.github.com>
RCDs use right click to deconstruct, everything else is functionally the same. The RCD defines also aren't bitflags anymore, they didn't seem to have any reason to be in the first place.
* Bespoke Material Backend
- Adds support for bespoke materials:
- Reimplements [/datum/material/var/id]
- Ports GetIdFromArguments from SSdcs
- Adds a wrapper define for GetMaterialRef
- Adds [MATERIAL_INIT_BESPOKE]
- Adds [/datum/material/proc/Initialize]
- Does not actually add any bespoke materials
- [ ] TODO: Code docs
- [ ] TODO: Actually adding bespoke materials
* Some has_material procs and cleaning up some spaghetti
- Adds a pair of has_material procs for use in checking whether a given atom has a given material
* Adds meat
- Adds bespoke meat variants
- Does not make them accessible
- Shuts up the linter
* Implements bespoke meat
- Makes the material container preserve bespoke materials
- Makes the sheetifier accept bespoke materials
- Makes the autolathe accept bespoke materials
- Makes the gibber produce bespoke meats
* Makes butchering produce bespoke meats
This is jank and really needs to be folded into a unified butchering and gibbing system
* Material documentation
- Adds, fixes, and touches up some documentation
* Material container insertion callback
- Changes the proc used to expand the material container's material list ot a proc used to check whether a material fits into a material container
- Instantiating new materials is no longer O(n) relative to the number of autolathes in existence.
* Makes processing meat conserve materials
- Makes bespoke meat carry over into meatballs
* Makes preserving custom materials an option
- Implements the ability to turn preserving custom materials _off_ for processor recipes
* Fixes all bespoke materials of the same type using the same singleton
- We use ids now, not just types.
* Makes the fat sucker produce bespoke meats
- Because consistency is good.
* Fixes autolathes merging bespoke stacks into normal stacks.
* Makes the callback to test materials for holdibility optional
- @Floyd
* GetMaterialRef -> GET_MATERIAL_REF
- We capitalize macros.
* Removes an extraneous callback
- Makes the sheetifier use functionality I didn't notice I implemented a few commits ago.
* Makes mob and species meat null compatible
* Fixes the ore silo
- The ore silo had really snowflake material handling that has been brought in line with the rest.
- The materials should show up in the correct order.
* Fixes minor lathe bugs
- Fixes stack_traces caused when lathes tried to fetch materials using reagent typepaths
- Fixed the selective reagent disposal topic. I have no idea how long this has been broken.
* Various documentation fixes
- Clarified a couple comments
- Removes an extraneous ?. operator
- Fixed mat floor tiles having bugged reagent temperatures
* More fixes
-/datum/material/meat/mob -> /datum/material/meat/mob_meat
- Adds atom typecheck to material containers.
* Fixes old typepaths
Huge removal of dead vars, bad timers, and other sloppy jitteriness from beams. They go from checking movement to waiting for a signal.
VARIABLE KILL LIST:
sleep_time: signals baby
finished: signals BAYBEEE
target_oldloc: not only not typecasted as a turf or named as a turf, it was unused. when are we going to use this? the beam starts from the origin!
origin_oldloc: bad name, not typecasted. renamed to originturf
static_beam: how are you an unused variable and still get replaced by signals like really
timing_id: signallllss bbbaaaabbyy
recalculating: you get the drill by now signals baby
base_icon: unused, seemingly replaced by visuals I think
* The Re-pricening
* Rewritten and adjusted for paycheck defines.
* I made the map changes finally.
* And the refills too.
* "OH YEAH REPLACING IT ALL WITH DEFINES AND SCALING IT THE EXCEL DOCUMENT WILL BE EASY, ARCANE!!!"
* And the premium ones too.
* Accidently spoiled a future pr due to dme bleedover
* Replaces some CANATMOSPASS calls with a new define that checks if the turfs are in each others atmos adjacent list, as that's the same info that they want.
Replaces like 70-80% of 0 and such, as a side effect cleaned up a bunch of returns
Edit: Most left out ones are in mecha which should be done in mecha refactor already
Oh my look how clean it is
Co-authored-by: TiviPlus <TiviPlus>
Co-authored-by: Couls <coul422@gmail.com>
