cacc49db8b
* Datumizes out jobconfig.toml (extensibility edition) (#76102)
## About The Pull Request
Hey there,
#75992 (fc54fd6a60) made me realize just
how wacky the job config system is to people trying to add more new
stuff to it, so I finally got the motivation to fix it up.
The gist is that it does all of the same stuff on the front-end as you
would expect, but instead of having to modify core generation code to
create/recreate the files, it instead uses a robust series of getters
and setters. It's much better to use these getters and setters because
we can apply needed game logic (like ensuring that the age that the
server operator puts in is actually sane, and not completely out of
bounds (if you want to permanently price people out of a position, just
set it to 0)). The getters are also nifty too, because they let me atone
for an early mistake I made with how assistants are meant to work with
"unlimited" nonsense.
All a new coder who wants to add stuff to the config needs to do now is
create the define, create the datum, add the procs for the datums, and
that's it! They don't have to do any of the wacky stuff or account for
weird stuff or do any weird copypasta, it's all handled by the system.
One datum is all you need, quite neat.
This also fixes some issues in #75992 that probably weren't discovered
in testing, but the only good way to fix it was a retune+refactor, which
is included in this PR.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Much more extensible, ensuring this system actually works as fully
intended, etc.
I fixed up the documentation (they didn't regenerate the job config
after they updated the code-side documentation) and some weird spacing
stuff that I missed in my review of that aforementioned PR. Everything
should work as expected, it's been tested quite a bit. It's also in its
own folder now, which is neat because we can share the local defines and
split all this stuff out of the already-quite-large SSjob file.
## Changelog
🆑
server: job_config.toml should now comply with reload-configuration
verb, meaning you can hot-reload the configuration from disk and have it
apply ingame automatically.
config: The documentation for setting Minimum Character Age on a per-Job
basis has been altered to be more explicit.
fix: The Minimum Character Age configuration entry is now sanitized to
ensure that it's within the codebase-defined ages, since there's no
(legitimate) way to get a character outside of those ages anyways.
Invalid values will log to the config log.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: Jacquerel <hnevard@ gmail.com>
* Datumizes out jobconfig.toml (extensibility edition)
---------
Co-authored-by: san7890 <the@san7890.com>
Co-authored-by: Jacquerel <hnevard@ gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lessthanthree <83487515+lessthnthree@users.noreply.github.com>
Unit Tests
What is unit testing?
Unit tests are automated code to verify that parts of the game work exactly as they should. For example, a test to make sure that the amputation surgery actually amputates the limb. These are ran every time a PR is made, and thus are very helpful for preventing bugs from cropping up in your code that would've otherwise gone unnoticed. For example, would you have thought to check that beach boys would still work the same after editing pizza? If you value your time, probably not.
On their most basic level, when UNIT_TESTS is defined, all subtypes of /datum/unit_test will have their Run proc executed. From here, if Fail is called at any point, then the tests will report as failed.
How do I write one?
- Find a relevant file.
All unit test related code is in code/modules/unit_tests. If you are adding a new test for a surgery, for example, then you'd open surgeries.dm. If a relevant file does not exist, simply create one in this folder, then #include it in _unit_tests.dm.
- Create the unit test.
To make a new unit test, you simply need to define a /datum/unit_test.
For example, let's suppose that we are creating a test to make sure a proc square correctly raises inputs to the power of two. We'd start with first:
/datum/unit_test/square/Run()
This defines our new unit test, /datum/unit_test/square. Inside this function, we're then going to run through whatever we want to check. Tests provide a few assertion functions to make this easy. For now, we're going to use TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL.
/datum/unit_test/square/Run()
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(square(3), 9, "square(3) did not return 9")
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(square(4), 16, "square(4) did not return 16")
As you can hopefully tell, we're simply checking if the output of square matches the output we are expecting. If the test fails, it'll report the error message given as well as whatever the actual output was.
- Run the unit test
Open code/_compile_options.dm and uncomment the following line.
//#define UNIT_TESTS //If this is uncommented, we do a single run though of the game setup and tear down process with unit tests in between
Then, run tgstation.dmb in Dream Daemon. Don't bother trying to connect, you won't need to. You'll be able to see the outputs of all the tests. You'll get to see which tests failed and for what reason. If they all pass, you're set!
How to think about tests
Unit tests exist to prevent bugs that would happen in a real game. Thus, they should attempt to emulate the game world wherever possible. For example, the quick swap sanity test emulates a real scenario of the bug it fixed occurring by creating a character and giving it real items. The unrecommended alternative would be to create special test-only items. This isn't a hard rule, the reagent method exposure tests create a test-only reagent for example, but do keep it in mind.
Unit tests should also be just that--testing units of code. For example, instead of having one massive test for reagents, there are instead several smaller tests for testing exposure, metabolization, etc.
The unit testing API
You can find more information about all of these from their respective doc comments, but for a brief overview:
/datum/unit_test - The base for all tests to be ran. Subtypes must override Run(). New() and Destroy() can be used for setup and teardown. To fail, use TEST_FAIL(reason).
/datum/unit_test/proc/allocate(type, ...) - Allocates an instance of the provided type with the given arguments. Is automatically destroyed when the test is over. Commonly seen in the form of var/mob/living/carbon/human/human = allocate(/mob/living/carbon/human/consistent).
TEST_FAIL(reason) - Marks a failure at this location, but does not stop the test.
TEST_ASSERT(assertion, reason) - Stops the unit test and fails if the assertion is not met. For example: TEST_ASSERT(powered(), "Machine is not powered").
TEST_ASSERT_NOTNULL(a, message) - Same as TEST_ASSERT, but checks if !isnull(a). For example: TEST_ASSERT_NOTNULL(myatom, "My atom was never set!").
TEST_ASSERT_NULL(a, message) - Same as TEST_ASSERT, but checks if isnull(a). If not, gives a helpful message showing what a was. For example: TEST_ASSERT_NULL(delme, "Delme was never cleaned up!").
TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(a, b, message) - Same as TEST_ASSERT, but checks if a == b. If not, gives a helpful message showing what both a and b were. For example: TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(2 + 2, 4, "The universe is falling apart before our eyes!").
TEST_ASSERT_NOTEQUAL(a, b, message) - Same as TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL, but reversed.
TEST_FOCUS(test_path) - Only run the test provided within the parameters. Useful for reducing noise. For example, if we only want to run our example square test, we can add TEST_FOCUS(/datum/unit_test/square). Should never be pushed in a pull request--you will be laughed at.
Final Notes
- Writing tests before you attempt to fix the bug can actually speed up development a lot! It means you don't have to go in game and folllow the same exact steps manually every time. This process is known as "TDD" (test driven development). Write the test first, make sure it fails, then start work on the fix/feature, and you'll know you're done when your tests pass. If you do try this, do make sure to confirm in a non-testing environment just to double check.
- Make sure that your tests don't accidentally call RNG functions like
prob. Since RNG is seeded during tests, you may not realize you have until someone else makes a PR and the tests fail! - Do your best not to change the behavior of non-testing code during tests. While it may sometimes be necessary in the case of situations such as the above, it is still a slippery slope that can lead to the code you're testing being too different from the production environment to be useful.