mirror of
https://github.com/Bubberstation/Bubberstation.git
synced 2025-12-27 18:12:00 +00:00
f54dcda1c0
Necessary for #72292 to work effectively, and probably not very useful out of that context. Split out of its own PR because this is long and boring. I want to make sure that we're catching actual mistakes there, and not just experiencing side effects of how shitty the attack chain is.
35 lines
1000 B
Plaintext
35 lines
1000 B
Plaintext
/*
|
|
* An element for making tools fragile, giving them a chance of
|
|
* "snapping into tiny pieces" after they've been used.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/datum/element/easily_fragmented
|
|
element_flags = ELEMENT_BESPOKE
|
|
argument_hash_start_idx = 2
|
|
|
|
var/break_chance
|
|
|
|
/datum/element/easily_fragmented/Attach(datum/target, break_chance)
|
|
. = ..()
|
|
if(!isitem(target))
|
|
return ELEMENT_INCOMPATIBLE
|
|
|
|
src.break_chance = break_chance
|
|
|
|
RegisterSignal(target, COMSIG_ITEM_AFTERATTACK, PROC_REF(on_afterattack))
|
|
|
|
/datum/element/easily_fragmented/Detach(datum/target)
|
|
. = ..()
|
|
UnregisterSignal(target, COMSIG_ITEM_AFTERATTACK)
|
|
|
|
/datum/element/easily_fragmented/proc/on_afterattack(datum/source, atom/target, mob/user, proximity_flag, click_parameters)
|
|
SIGNAL_HANDLER
|
|
|
|
var/obj/item/item = source
|
|
|
|
if(prob(break_chance))
|
|
user.visible_message(span_danger("[user]'s [item.name] snap[item.p_s()] into tiny pieces in [user.p_their()] hand."))
|
|
item.deconstruct(disassembled = FALSE)
|
|
|
|
return COMPONENT_AFTERATTACK_PROCESSED_ITEM
|