mirror of
https://github.com/Bubberstation/Bubberstation.git
synced 2026-04-24 17:27:03 +01:00
0f435d5dff
Done using this command sed -Ei 's/(\s*\S+)\s*\t+/\1 /g' code/**/*.dm We have countless examples in the codebase with this style gone wrong, and defines and such being on hideously different levels of indentation. Fixing this to keep the alignment involves tainting the blames of code your PR doesn't need to be touching at all. And ultimately, it's hideous. There are some files that this sed makes uglier. I can fix these when they are pointed out, but I believe this is ultimately for the greater good of readability. I'm more concerned with if any strings relied on this. Hi codeowners! Co-authored-by: Jared-Fogle <35135081+Jared-Fogle@users.noreply.github.com>
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
35 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
/datum/element/rad_insulation
|
|
element_flags = ELEMENT_DETACH | ELEMENT_BESPOKE
|
|
id_arg_index = 2
|
|
var/amount // Multiplier for radiation strength passing through
|
|
|
|
/datum/element/rad_insulation/Attach(datum/target, _amount=RAD_MEDIUM_INSULATION, protects=TRUE, contamination_proof=TRUE)
|
|
. = ..()
|
|
if(!isatom(target))
|
|
return COMPONENT_INCOMPATIBLE
|
|
|
|
if(protects) // Does this protect things in its contents from being affected?
|
|
RegisterSignal(target, COMSIG_ATOM_RAD_PROBE, .proc/rad_probe_react)
|
|
if(contamination_proof) // Can this object be contaminated?
|
|
RegisterSignal(target, COMSIG_ATOM_RAD_CONTAMINATING, .proc/rad_contaminating)
|
|
if(_amount != 1) // If it's 1 it won't have any impact on radiation passing through anyway
|
|
RegisterSignal(target, COMSIG_ATOM_RAD_WAVE_PASSING, .proc/rad_pass)
|
|
|
|
amount = _amount
|
|
|
|
/datum/element/rad_insulation/proc/rad_probe_react(datum/source)
|
|
SIGNAL_HANDLER
|
|
|
|
return COMPONENT_BLOCK_RADIATION
|
|
|
|
/datum/element/rad_insulation/proc/rad_contaminating(datum/source, strength)
|
|
SIGNAL_HANDLER
|
|
|
|
return COMPONENT_BLOCK_CONTAMINATION
|
|
|
|
/datum/element/rad_insulation/proc/rad_pass(datum/source, datum/radiation_wave/wave, width)
|
|
SIGNAL_HANDLER
|
|
|
|
wave.intensity = wave.intensity*(1-((1-amount)/width)) // The further out the rad wave goes the less it's affected by insulation (larger width)
|
|
return COMPONENT_RAD_WAVE_HANDLED
|