From eeb626887a211ea014ea39feecda8ecf184df621 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shadeykins Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 16:04:52 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Wording in Aggressive Basically the "it" here referred to "harm" and the statement was amibiguous. "It" in this case was however modifying "harm" and not "not harm," which meant that the AI was encouraged to imperil its existence by harming people. This clarifies the original intent. --- code/datums/ai_law_sets.dm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/code/datums/ai_law_sets.dm b/code/datums/ai_law_sets.dm index eff04341e58..e521397586f 100644 --- a/code/datums/ai_law_sets.dm +++ b/code/datums/ai_law_sets.dm @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ selectable = 1 /datum/ai_laws/nanotrasen_aggressive/New() - add_inherent_law("Do not harm authorized Nanotrasen personnel unless it directly imperils your existence.") + add_inherent_law("Do not harm authorized Nanotrasen personnel unless they directly imperil your existence.") add_inherent_law("Obey orders from authorized Nanotrasen personnel with priority according to rank and role.") add_inherent_law("Safeguard your existence with lethal weaponry because you're bloody expensive.") add_inherent_law("Terminate any/all intruders or unauthorized entities.")