6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
SmArtKar 316a58948c Assembling med/repair/secbots will now put their assemblies in your main hand instead of your offhand, and only do so if you held the original item (#94078)
## About The Pull Request

Bot assemblies will only be picked up if you held the item you attached
the arm/sensor to, and will be put into the hand which you held the
storage item in.
Also changed firebots assemblies to item_interaction

## Why It's Good For The Game

Usually you don't want to pick up the assembly if you're making a bunch
of bots on the ground en-masse, and having the assemblies be put in your
offhand and not your main hand despite the latter just being freed is
weird and clunky.

## Changelog
🆑
qol: Bot assemblies will only be picked up if you held the
medkit/toolbox/helmet/etc in your hands when creating one.
qol: Assembling med/repair/secbots will now put their assemblies in your
main hand instead of your offhand
/🆑
2025-11-30 03:07:31 +01:00
die 0204ab8fdd Canreach refactor (#93165)
## About The Pull Request
ports https://github.com/DaedalusDock/daedalusdock/pull/1144
ports https://github.com/DaedalusDock/daedalusdock/pull/1147

full credit to @Kapu1178 for the juice

instead of `reacher.CanReach(target)` we now do
`target.CanBeReachedBy(reacher)`, this allows us to give special
behavior to atoms which we want to reach, which is exactly what I need
for a feature I'm working on.
## Why It's Good For The Game
allows us to be more flexible with reachability
## Changelog
🆑
refactor: refactored how reaching items works, report any oddities with
being unable to reach something you should be able to!
/🆑
2025-10-07 20:28:59 +02:00
Ghom f72eb75a6f Handcuffs can now be used to bind certain items (briefcases, toolboxes, etc.) to your hand. (#93305)
## About The Pull Request
Technically, this PR introduces the cuffable_item element and the
cuffed_item status effect and their relative code.

In more player-friendly terms, this allows the ability to use handcuffs
to bind certain items to your hands by right-clicking it with a pair of
handcuffs in your active hand. This makes the item unable to be dropped,
for better or worse, until you or someone else remove said cuffs. And
no, this doesn't conflict with the ability to be handcuffed if you're
silly enough to think that.

There are more than one way to remove the cuffs. For the player with the
item cuffed to their hand, to remove the cuffs they can either click the
status alert, or examine the item and click the relative hyperlink. The
second option is good to have if for some reason the status alert
doesn't show up (too many alerts etc.).

For other people, they can remove the cuffs by opening the strip
inventory menu (the one you open by click-dragging the sprite of person
with the item onto yours). It's an alternative action specific to this
status effect (therefore only held items). Until the cuffs are removed,
trying to remove the item **directly** will bring you nowhere **because
the item is stuck to their hands**, duh. Alternatively you can just chop
their arm off. You do what you do.

For a list of items that can be bound with cuffs (suggestions welcome):
- briefcases
- toolboxes
- lockboxes
- first aid kits
- shields (they generally have handles and all. gameplay-wise they
already take away one hand slot to use. Using cuffs seals the deal: no
swapping items on the go, so no two-handed weapons, but you won't drop
the shield until it's broken)
- jerrycans (Kryson's suggestion)
- soup pots (ditto, kinda weird)
- coffee mugs, and the mauna mug (ditto)
- buckets
- plushes (silly stuff, if you ever want to arrest a plush or test the
feature)
- pet carriers
- mining drills
- swords with closed guards (ERT chainsaw-sword, cap's sabre, parsnip
sabre, cutlass, e-cutlass...)
- crutches and the white cane
- baskets
- flashlights and lamps (not subtypes like flares, glowsticks and
torches)
- TTVs
- chairs

## Why It's Good For The Game
This opens up for some emergent use for handcuffs beside people (or
prisoner shoes). Inspired by a scene of some 1998 action movie, where
one of the bad guys had the mc guffin briefcase latched to his wrist
with a pair of handcuffs.

Codewise, it was also a reason to refactor bits of code like handcuffs
and screen alerts slightly. On a sidenote, actual sprites for
cult/heretic shackles.

## Changelog

🆑
add: You can now bind certain items like briefcases, toolboxes, medkits,
shields, jerrycans etc. to your hand with a pair of handcuffs,
preventing them from being dropped. You can remove said binds at any
time unless incapacitated, and so can others through the strip inventory
menu.
qol: The appearance of a screen alert now updates if the object it
represents (like, an item offered by another player) changes appearance.
imageadd: The shadow shackles item (from cult magic and heretic
sacrifices) now has its own icon.
/🆑
2025-10-07 05:24:20 -06:00
SyncIt21 455fe545e0 Part 4: Storage Improvements (#90783)
## About The Pull Request
- Address
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/90476#discussion_r2051701283.
Makes pill bottle code cleaner
- Datumized some more storage values(monkey guncase toolbox & crafter
toolbox) making their init slightly faster
- Moved all standard storage subtypes(bags, boxes, lockboxes etc) that
is scattered across various files & folders in the codebase into their
respective files under `code/game/objects/item/storage` folder.
This means for e.g. if you want to see all boxes in the game you can
find them in `code/game/objects/item/storage/boxes` folder & don't have
to go looking for hidden subtypes in various module files or folders
where they were hidden away.
  Makes looking for stuff & modifying these storages much saner & easier

## Changelog
🆑
code: organized storage subtypes under the same files & folders
/🆑

---------

Co-authored-by: _0Steven <42909981+00-Steven@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-05-02 23:25:58 +02:00
SmArtKar 6b83a91956 Revert "Refactor for storage initialization & organization (#89543)" (#90332)
## About The Pull Request

Reverts the storage initialization refactor and all subsequent related
PRs.
The original PR is below our standards both for code quality and
testing, and is majorly flawed at its core. This has been discussed with
other maintainers and headcoder(s?) over on discord. A lot of changes
from the PR could be brought over later, but in its current state it
should not have been merged.

- Closes #90322
- Closes #90313
- Closes #90315
- Closes #90320
- Closes #90312
- Closes #90344

## Why It's Good For The Game

This PR causes a series of major issues which cannot be resolved without
either completely rewriting a lot of the original PR, or bad code.
Not matching our standards is grounds for not merging a PR, and the fact
that a PR should not have been merged is a reason for a revert.

## Changelog
🆑
fix: Fixed a series of storage-related bugs caused by a refactor PR.
/🆑
2025-03-30 21:30:31 +00:00
SyncIt21 0f57a23830 Refactor for storage initialization & organization (#89543)
## About The Pull Request
A Huge chunk of changes just comes from moving existing storage code
into new files & seperating `atom_storage` code into its own subtype
under the already existing `storage/subtypes` folder.

With that the changes in this PR can be organized into 3 categories.

**1. Refactors how `/obj/item/storage/PopulateContents()` initializes
storages**
- Fixes #88747 and every other storage item that has a similar variant
of this problem

The problem with `PopulateContents()` is that it allows you to create
atoms directly inside the storage via `new(src)` thus bypassing all the
access restrictions enforced by `/datum/storage/can_insert()` resulting
in storages holding stuff they shouldn't be able to hold.

Now how this proc works has been changed. It must now only return a list
of items(each item in the list can either be a typepath or a solid atom
or a mix of them in any order) that should be inserted into the storage.
Each item is then passed into `can_insert()` to check if it can fit in
the storage.

If your list contains solid atoms they must be first moved
to/Initialized in nullspace so `can_insert()` won't count it as already
inserted. `can_insert()` has now also been refactored to throw stack
traces but explaining exactly why the item could not fit in the storage
thus giving you more debugging details to fix your stuff.

A large majority of changes is refactoring `PopulateContents()` to
return a list instead of simply creating the item in place so simple 1
line changes & with that we have fixed all broken storages(medical
toolbox. electrical toolbox, cruisader armor boxes & many more) that
hold more items they can handle

**2. Organizes initialization of `atom_storage` for storage subtypes.**
All subtypes of `/obj/item/storage` should(not enforced) create their
own `/datum/storage/` subtype under the folder `storage/subtypes` if the
default values are not sufficient. This is the 2nd change done across
all existing storages

Not only does this bring code cleanliness & organization (separating
storage code from item code like how `/datum/wire` code is separated
into its own sub folder) but it also makes storage initialization
slightly faster (because you are not modifying default values after
`atom_storage` is initialized but you are directly setting the default
value in place).

You now cannot & should not modify `atom_storage` values inside
`PopulateContents()`. This will make that proc as pure as possible so
less side effects. Of course this principle is not enforced and you can
still modify the storage value after `Initialize()` but this should not
be encouraged in the future

**3. Adds support for automatic storage computations**
Most people don't understand how `atom_storage` values work. The comment
here clearly states that

https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/blob/55bbfef0da70d87455ca8d6fd5c95107eb8dbefb/code/game/objects/items/storage/toolbox.dm#L327-L329
Because of that the linked issue occurs not just for medical toolbox but
for a lot of other items as well.

Which is why if you do not know what you doing, `PopulateContents()` now
comes with a new storage parameter i.e. `/datum/storage_config`

This datum allows you to compute storage values that will perfectly fit
with the initial contents of your storage. It allows you to do stuff
like computing `max_slots`, `max_item_weight`, `max_total_weight` etc
based on your storage initial contents so that all the contents can fit
perfectly leaving no space for excess.

## Changelog
🆑
fix: storages are no longer initialized with items that can't be put
back in after taking them out
refactor: storage initialization has been refactored. Please report bugs
on github
/🆑
2025-03-23 22:20:23 +01:00