* use SIGNAL_HANDLER REEEEEE (#59242)
makes as many procs as i can find use the SIGNAL_HANDLER define which i assumed they all already did
* USE SIGNAL_HANDLER REEEEEE
Co-authored-by: Kylerace <kylerlumpkin1@gmail.com>
* Standardizes attack chain signal returns and fixes a tk bug (#54475)
The attack chain is a bit of a mess, and the introduction of signals hasn't helped in simplifying it.
In order to take a step into untangling this, I re-ordered the attack signals to no longer be by source type and instead to be grouped more modularly, as they are all members of the attack chain and function similarly. They all share the trait of potentially ending the attack chain via a return, but had several different names for it. I joined it into one.
Additionally, fixed a tk bug reported by @ Timberpoes by adding a signal return check at the base of /mob/proc/RangedAttack
Lastly, removed the async call of /datum/mutation/human/telekinesis/proc/on_ranged_attack, which was added as a lazy patch to appease the linter complaining about a sleep on a signal handler (namely in /obj/singularity/attack_tk). Fixed the problem using timers.
Also cleaned some code here and there.
* Standardizes attack chain signal returns and fixes a tk bug
Co-authored-by: Rohesie <rohesie@gmail.com>
* Implements timed_action_flags for do_after-like procs (#54409)
Originally I wanted to fix an issue where the `get_up()` `do_after()` would ignore the callback checks, because it was `uninterruptible`, so that made me refactor these procs to allow for higher granularity on checks and standardize behavior a bit more.
There's more work to be done for them, but one thing at a time.
* Removes the `uninterruptible` check in favor of the more granular `timed_action_flags`
* Cleans code on the `do_atom`, `do_after_mob`, `do_mob` and `do_after` procs to standardize them a little better.
* Implements timed_action_flags for do_after-like procs
* Update horror_form.dm
Co-authored-by: Rohesie <rohesie@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Azarak <azarak10@gmail.com>
* Merge pull request #53020 from Qustinnus/fatgrowing
[READY] Vatgrowing: Third time's the charm
* [READY] Vatgrowing: Third time's the charm
Co-authored-by: 81Denton <32391752+81Denton@users.noreply.github.com>