## About The Pull Request
This PR changes it so that if you refine an anomaly by neutralising it,
it respects the same limit on number of anomaly cores as refining one
you bought from Cargo.
If it would produce an illegal core, it will create a mostly useless
inert core which you can sell at cargo for 80% of the price of buying a
raw core.
## Why It's Good For The Game
https://hackmd.io/@tgstation/r1tzxpwPL
This was a requirement in the original design doc which just never made
it into the game.
We want to be able to control how many cores of each type can possibly
exist in a round, as this is what allows them to have the "these items
can be really busted" allowance.
## Changelog
🆑
fix: Neutralising an anomaly cannot produce more anomaly cores than are
supposed to exist in a single round
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This refactors how machines are deconstructed in the following ways
- You can no longer override `obj/machinery/deconstruct()`. If you want
customized behaviour then override `on_deconstruction()` instead.
This comes with the added benifit of no longer needing to check for the
`NO_DECONSTRUCTION` flag because the machine base proc does that for us
& if it finds that flag it won't proceed to call `on_deconstruction()`
meaning no machine will have a chance to spawn anything which is the
current behaviour.
This is required to make #81290 work for all machines at least so that
machine can send the `COMSIG_OBJ_DECONSTRUCT` signal without subtypes
overriding & forgetting to call the parent proc
- `dump_contents()` only gets called when the machine is deconstructed
not destroyed thus not leaving behind any of its contents inside. Fixes
https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/pull/81290#issuecomment-1925752583
## Changelog
🆑
fix: machines that should not drop contents when deleted no longer do.
refactor: refactors how machines are deconstructed. report bugs on
github.
/🆑
---------
Co-authored-by: MrMelbert <51863163+MrMelbert@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
I woke up today and thought 'what would be easy thing to do today so I
can say I've done something?'. Then I remembered I saw several gangtool
usages the time I split radio up, and I could remedy those. 7 hours
later, device.dmi is split in a folder of its own, and I've also given
unique sprites to door remotes and landing desginators.
## Why It's Good For The Game
The device.dmi was kind of a mess.
## Changelog
🆑
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
Implements half of this (with some minor changes):

The ultimate goal of this is to split our attack chain in two:
- One for non-combat item interactions
- Health analyzer scanning
- using tools on stuff
- surgery
- Niche other interactions
- One for combat attacking
- Item hit thing, item deal damage.
- Special effects on attack would go here.
This PR begins this by broadining tool act into item interact.
Item interact is a catch-all proc ran at the beginning of attack chain,
before `pre_attack` and such, that handles the first part of the chain.
This allows us to easily catch item interaction and cancel the attack
part of the chain by using deliberate bitflag return values, rather than
`TRUE` / `FALSE`*.
*Because right now, `TRUE` = `cancel attack`, no matter what, which is
unclear to people.
Instead of moving as much as possible to the new proc in this PR, I
started by doing some easy, obvious things. More things can be moved in
the future, or technically they don't even need to move in a lot of
cases.
## Changelog
🆑 Melbert
refactor: Refactored some methods of items interacting with other
objects or mobs, such as surgery and health analzyers. Report if
anything seems wrong
/🆑
## About The Pull Request
This takes all the gib related procs:
- `gib()`
- `spawn_gibs()`
- `spill_organs()`
- `spread_bodyparts()`
And adds heavy documentation that communicates what the procs are used
for and how the different bitflags affect them. The difference is
noticeable:
`gib(TRUE, FALSE, FALSE, null)` vs `gib(DROP_ORGANS|DROP_BODYPARTS)`
The code is now much more legible which is important considering it's
used in a lot of places!
Another robust change, is that we had several places in the code where
there were double negatives like so:
```
/mob/living/carbon/spill_organs(no_brain, no_organs, no_bodyparts)
if(!no_bodyparts) // DOUBLE NEGATIVES ARE BAD M'KAY?!?
// do stuff here
```
This is a mindfuck to untangle. I inverted a lot of these parts so we
don't lose our sanity.
Last thing that was changed was a big `if()` loop in the `spill_organ()`
proc. This was refactored to just be a simple `for` loop with `continue`
statements where we needed to skip enabled bitflags. It's now shorter
and cleaner than before.
The only slight gameplay change this affects is that gibbing a mob now
guarantees to drop all items unless the `DROP_ITEMS` bitflag is
deliberately omitted. Some places like admin gib self, we don't want
this to happen.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Gib code is very old. (~15 years) People kept adding more arguments to
the procs when it should have been a bitflag initially. By doing it this
way, there is more flexibility and readability when it comes to adding
new code in the future.
## Changelog
🆑
refactor: Refactor gib code to be more robust.
qol: Gibbing a mob will result in all items being dropped instead of
getting deleted. There are a few exceptions (like admin gib self) where
this will not take place.
/🆑
Does as the name states. I found it weird that the ectoplasm anomaly
core is not referred to as raw when you have to refine it and instead
used both the normally refined core icon as well as the name not saying
it was a raw anomaly core at all.
## About The Pull Request
Pretty self explanatory. Someone just forgot a return statement after
the error message here.
Closes https://github.com/Skyrat-SS13/Skyrat-tg/issues/20803
## Why It's Good For The Game
Bugfix/oversight
## Changelog
🆑
fix: the anomaly refinery will no longer let you insert cores of
insufficient quality to refine
/🆑
# MAINTAINER - USE THE BUTTON THAT SAYS "MERGE MASTER" THEN SET THE PR
TO AUTO-MERGE! IT'S MUCH EASIER FOR ME TO FIX THINGS BEFORE THEY SKEW
RATHER THAN AFTER THE FACT.
## About The Pull Request
Hey there,
This took a while to do, but here's the gist:
Python file now regexes every file in `/code` except for those that have
some valid reason to be tacking on more global defines. Some of those
reasons are simply just that I don't have the time right now (doing what
you see in this PR took a few hours) to refactor and parse what should
belong and what should be thrown out. For the time being though, this PR
will at least _halt_ people making the mistake of not `#undef`ing any
files they `#define` "locally", or within the scope of a file.
Most people forget to do this and this leads to a lot of mess later on
due to how many variables can be unmanaged on the global level. I've
made this mistake, you've made this mistake, it's a common thing. Let's
automatically check for it so it can be fixed no-stress.
Scenarios this PR corrects:
* Forgetting to undef a define but undeffing others.
* Not undeffing any defines in your file.
* Earmarking a define as a "file local" define, but not defining it.
* Having a define be a "file local" define, but having it be used
elsewhere.
* Having a "local" define not even be in the file that it only shows up
in.
* Having a completely unused define*
(* I kept some of these because they seemed important... Others were
junked.)
## Why It's Good For The Game
If you wanna use it across multiple files, no reason to not make it a
global define (maybe there's a few reasons but let's assume that this is
the 95% case).
Let me know if you don't like how I re-arranged some of the defines and
how you'd rather see it be implemented, and I'd be happy to do that.
This was mostly just "eh does it need it or not" sorta stuff.
I used a pretty cool way to detect if we should use the standardized
GitHub "error" output, you can see the results of that here
https://github.com/san7890/bruhstation/actions/runs/4549766579/jobs/8022186846#step:7:792
## Changelog
Nothing that really concerns players.
(I fixed up all this stuff using vscode, no regexes beyond what you see
in the python script. sorry downstreams)
## About The Pull Request
This PR description might be a bit rushed because I accidentally
submitted the PR and want to bang out a quick explanation of what this
is before people start asking questions.
Adds a new, rare, ghost-themed anomaly event -- The Ectoplasmic
Outburst.

This event increases in power as more ghosts orbit it, with three
important thresholds to meet.
If 10% or more of all active observers are orbiting the anomaly, an
effect will occur in the nearby area akin to the revenant's defile
spell, damaging flooring, windows, and making a mess.
If 35% or more are orbiting the anomaly, nearby objects in the effect
radius have a chance to become haunted, and will fling themselves at
anyone nearby for a bit. Spooky!
Now, at 50% or more participation, things get serious. Ghosts orbiting
the anomaly will be polled to be brought back into the world for a brief
period as a vengeful spirit, anchored to a SUPER spooky ghost portal.
The portal closes after two minutes (alternatively, smash it with a
toolbox) and deletes all of the ghosts it spawned. Vengeful spirits are
mostly just meant to smash stuff and be a nuisance while they can. It's
a wonderful opportunity to let deadchat desalinate a little.

Oh, also, the anomaly is deadchat controlled. With enough ghosts, you
could theoretically outrun anyone trying to neutralize it!
The associated reactive armor has an effect similar to the anomaly,
haunting nearby objects for a time when the wearer is struck. Not
particularly outstanding, but it can introduce an element of chaos into
a fight that your opponent might not expect.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Anomaly events are great for ghosts. Why not make one tailored just for
them!
Gives admins something to spawn when a wizard has killed half of the
crew but it's not quiiiite time for an ERT.
It's a bit of a silly event with a novelty reward, but I think it's rare
enough not to be a huge issue.
## Changelog
🆑 Rhials
add: Ectoplasmic Outburst anomaly event
add: Reactive Ectoplasm Armor
/🆑
Adds lints for `balloon_alert(span_xxx(...))` (which is always wrong),
and balloon alert where the first letter is a capital (which is usually
wrong). Fixes everything that failed them. As a reminder, abbreviations
like "AI" and "GPS" shouldn't be capitalized in a balloon alert.
In cases where this is intentional for flavor (there was one case), you
can `UNLINT` like so:
Co-authored-by: Zephyr <12817816+ZephyrTFA@users.noreply.github.com>
## About The Pull Request
All investigate logs start with [src], which can be any atom. So
sometimes names and items get printed twice. Adds ckeys to the
investigate_logs of living mobs.

## Why It's Good For The Game
Better logging, includes the ckey for living mobs in investigate logs,
and fixes some investigate_death logs that weren't properly attributed
to mobs.
## Changelog
🆑 Tattle
admin: investigate logs include ckey of source (if applicable)
/🆑
Co-authored-by: tattle <article.disaster@gmail.com>
## About The Pull Request
Soft revert of #71224 , Fixes#71222
Fixes an exploit involving attachment of multiple igniters to one
assembly.
- Multiple igniters or condensers can no longer be attached to the same
assembly holder
- Assembly holders have a limit of 12 assemblies maximum
- I'm not sure if this is too low or limited, I picked it arbitrarily.
Please inform me if it could be upped a smidge.
- This lag exploit was born because of limitless assembly holders, which
is a little silly even with the exploit aside. All that uncapped holders
can bring are exploits or bugs, which I feel confident limited can
prevent. What use is there even for having so many?
- Cleans up / refactors some aspects of assemblies and assembly holders.
- Assemblies had a weird wire type flag that was only ever used by
signallers, but also used wrong by signallers. I did some scanning of
the code and realized that ... a lot of this was just straight up
unused, and not even assigned anywhere.
- Now, there is a flag assembly flag var, which everything is read off
of. Tested it and still seemed to all work fine.
## Why It's Good For The Game
Lag exploits are bad.
## Changelog
🆑 Melbert
fix: Fixed an exploit involving igniters attached to themselves.
Assembly holders are now limited to 12 assemblies maximum, and you
cannot attach multiple igniters to the same assembly.
refactor: Refactored some assembly jank, namely in how they pulse and
are pulsed.
/🆑
Makes the code compatible with 515.1594+
Few simple changes and one very painful one.
Let's start with the easy:
* puts call behind `LIBCALL` define, so call_ext is properly used in 515
* Adds `NAMEOF_STATIC(_,X)` macro for nameof in static definitions since
src is now invalid there.
* Fixes tgui and devserver. From 515 onward the tmp3333{procid} cache
directory is not appened to base path in browser controls so we don't
check for it in base js and put the dev server dummy window file in
actual directory not the byond root.
* Renames the few things that had /final/ in typepath to ultimate since
final is a new keyword
And the very painful change:
`.proc/whatever` format is no longer valid, so we're replacing it with
new nameof() function. All this wrapped in three new macros.
`PROC_REF(X)`,`TYPE_PROC_REF(TYPE,X)`,`GLOBAL_PROC_REF(X)`. Global is
not actually necessary but if we get nameof that does not allow globals
it would be nice validation.
This is pretty unwieldy but there's no real alternative.
If you notice anything weird in the commits let me know because majority
was done with regex replace.
@tgstation/commit-access Since the .proc/stuff is pretty big change.
Co-authored-by: san7890 <the@san7890.com>
Co-authored-by: Mothblocks <35135081+Mothblocks@users.noreply.github.com>
About The Pull Request
Everyone has been asking: "When will there be an anomaly like the bioscrambler, but for the space station? Please, we need more things which replace objects with different objects from the same typepath."
Well I made it and it looked like ass because non-tiling floor and walls look terrible, so then I made this instead.
Dimensional.mp4
The "dimensional anomaly" shifts matter into a parallel dimension where objects are made out of something else.
Like the Bioscrambler anomaly, it does not expire on its own and only leaves when someone signals it or uses an anomaly remover.
When it spawns it picks a "theme" and converts terrain around it until it covers a 7x7 square, then it teleports somewhere else and picks a new theme.
A lot of these themes are relatively benign like "meat", "fancy carpet", or "gold". Some of them are kind of annoying like "icebox" because it creates floor which slows you down, or "clown" because bananium is intentionally annoying. Some of them are actively dangerous, mostly "uranium" and "plasma".
The main problem this will usually cause for crewmembers is decreasing area security. When it replaces doors it replaces them with ones which don't have any access control, and it will also replace RWalls with normal and much more vulnerable walls which will make breaking and entering significantly easier until someone has taken the time to fix the damage. But also sometimes it will irradiate them, you never know.
The fact that sometimes the changes are benign (or provide uncommon materials) and might be happening in places you don't care about access to might encourage people to push their luck and leave it alone until it starts turning the captain's office into a bamboo room or repainting medbay a fetching shade of flammable purple, which I would consider a success.
Armour.mp4
If you successfully harvest the anomaly core you can place it into the reactive armour to get Reactive Barricade Armour, which shifts your dimension when you take damage and attempts to place some randomised (not terribly durable) objects between you and hopefully your attacker (it really just picks up to four random unoccupied tiles next to you). If you're EMPed then the changes it make to the environment will often be as unpleasant for you as they are for a pursuer, and significantly more likely to harm both of you rather than just provide obstacles.
Other changes:
I split anomalies out into their own dmi file, seems to be all the rage lately.
I moved the anomaly placing code into a datum instead of the event because I wanted to reuse it but if you have a better idea about where I could have put it let me know.
This also fixes a bug where the material spreader component wasn't working when I applied plasma materials to something, the extra whitespace was parsing as another argument for some reason and meant it would runtime.
Supermatter delamination was still pointing to Delimber anomalies instead of Bioscrambler.
A new anomaly is here! the Delimber anomaly!
contrary to its name, this anomaly doesn't do you dirty by removing all your limbs.
It will instead improve your body by randomizing your limbs with every species known! Isn't that amazing?!
Incredibly enough it can also change your organs, improving them and expanding them! (we think this is amazing!)
Now you can also harness that power by constructing a reactive armor with its core, but be aware to not get hit by an EM pulse, our insurance doesn't cover that.
A note on safety, this anomaly doesn't stop, will keep on pulsating until eliminated.
Fixes#66635 and moves the behavior behind emagging. It's funny, but probably shouldn't be something you can do by accident simply by spamming the start compression button.
New anomaly, the hallucination anomaly. It has small bursts of hallucinations while alive followed by a big one in the moment of the end.
More anomalies are fun, i'm planning to add more of these
added the hallucination anomaly, spawnrate similar to the flux one, can spawn from the SM if eer are over 5000, can spawn when the SM delams (higher rate than the grav one), you can make the hallucination reactive armor
I'll do more in the future but I'll limit myself to this because I'm tired, bored, and don't want to make so many PRs touching the same things that I have to deal with conflicts each time one is merged.
Just as an example, screwdriver's gotta be done as well, does the exact same thing wrenches do, I believe.
Standardizes (and touches) each time default_unfasten_wrench is used.
Fixes tool logs, since it relies on tool acts to exist, I'm trying to move as many tool acts to its proper proc. Like a spiritual successor to the tool superpack PRs.
Co-authored-by: Luc <89928798+lewcc@users.noreply.github.com>
How do I play/test/operate this?
Download NT Frontier on any modular computers. It should debrief you on what experiments are available and how to publish.
If you want to do a bomb experiment, make sure it's captured by the doppler array (as usual) and then print the experiments into a disk and publish it.
If you want to do a gas experiment, make the gas and either pump it into a tank and 1) overpressurize it with a "clear" gas like N2 or 2) overpressurize tanks with the gas itself. Make sure you do the overpressurizing in the compressor machine. When tanks are destroyed/ejected leaked gas will get recorded. Print it into a disk and publish it.
For publication, the file needs to be directly present inside the computer's HDD. This means you need to copy it first with the file manager.
Fill the data (if desired, it will autofill with boiler plate if you dont) and send away!
Doing experiments unlock nodes, while doing them well unlocks boosts (which are discounts but slightly more restrictive) which are purchaseable with NT Frontier.
If you are testing this and have access to admin tools, there are various premade bombs under obj/effect/spawner/newbomb
A doc I wrote detailing the why and what part of this PR.
https://hackmd.io/JOakSYVMSh2zU2YL5ju_-Q
---
# Intro
## The Problem(s)
Ordnance, (previously toxins) seems to lack a lot of content and things to do. The gameplay loop consists of making a bomb and then sending it off for credits or using it to refine cores. Ordnance at it's inception originally relies on players experimenting and finding the perfect mix over multiple rounds, but once the recipe for a "do-everything" mix got out, the original charm of individual discoveries becomes meaningless.
Another issue with ordnance is the odd difficulty curve. As a new player, ordnance is almost impossible to decipher, but once you watch a tutorial or read a wiki and can mail a 50k into space, there pretty much isn't anything else to do. Most players will be satisfied at this point without the gameplay loop encouraging them to understand or play more. The only thing you can do afterwards is to sink your teeth in and understand why that particular mix explodes the way it does. This again has a significant difficulty curve, but if you do that, the department doesn't acknowledge or reward that in any way. There are pretty much two huge spikes, with the latter one not really existing inside the department.
TLDR:
* The content being same-y over rounds.
* Odd difficulty curve:
1. A new player is oblivious to everything.
2. Those in the middle can repeat the final goal consistently without needing to understanding why
3. There is nothing to justify spending more time in the department after reaching the midgame.
## Abstract
Scientific Papers aim to add a framework to run multiple experiments in ordnance. Adding more experiments scattered across various atmospheric aspects might allow players of various knowledge levels to still have something engaging to do. A new player should have an easier challange than to mail a 50K. While those that already can make bombs should have an easier time understanding why their bombs explode the way it does. Once they fully understand why, they can set their sights on taking advantage of another reaction to set their bomb off or hone one particular reaction down.
## Goals
* Have some intro-level challanges for new players.
* Have some semblance of late-game challanges for more experienced players.
* Explain the mechanics better for those in the middle of the road.
* Incentivize trying new things out in the department.
* Better integrate Ordnance with Experisci
## Boundaries / Dont's
* Do not incentivize people to learn ordnance by using PvP loots.
* Do not shake or change the reaction system by a huge amount.
* Disincentivize having a single god-mix that does everything.
****
# Main design pillars
## A. Framework surrounding the experiments
### A.1. New experiments
Add new experiments to the ExperiSci module. These will come in two flavours: New explosions to do, and various gas synthesis experiments. Both of these are actually supported by the map layout of ordnance right now, but there is no reason to do anything outside of making a 50k as fast as possible.
### A.2. Rewards for experiments: Cash and Techweb Boosts.
Scientific papers will add a separate experiment handling system. A single experiment will be graded into various tiers, each tier corresponding to the explosion size or amount of gas made. Doing any tier of a specific experiment will unlock the discount for that specific reactions. A single explosion **WILL NOT** do multiple experiments (or even tiers) at once.
On publication, a partner can be selected. A single partner only has a specific criteria of experiments they want. The experiments will then be graded on "how good they are done", with the criteria being more punishing as tier increases. Publication will then reward scientific cooperation with the partnered partner. Players can spend this cooperation on techweb boosts. Techweb boosts are meant to be subservient to discount from experiments and will not shave a node's price to be lower than 500 points.
**Experiments will only unlock nodes, discounts are handled through this boost system.**
This is more for maintainability than anything.
### A.3. On Tedium
*This is a note on implementation more than anything, but I think this helps explains why several things are done.*
Due to the nature of atmospheric reactions in the game (they're all linear), tedium is a very important thing to consider. An experiment should have a sweet spot to aim for, but there should not be a point where further mastery is stopped dead on it's track with a reward cap.
Scientific Papers attempts to discourage this behaviour by having the "maximum score" scale off to infinity but with the rewards being smaller and smaller. The sweet spot is always there to aim for and should be well communicated with players, but on their last submission of an experiment topic players should be encouraged to do their best. There should always be a reward for pushing the system to it's limit as long as it doesn't completely nullify the other subdepartments. This is the reason why there is a hard limit on the number of publications and why the score calculation is a bit more complex than it needed to be.
## B. Gas Synthesis (Early-Mid Game)
Scientific papers will add one new machine that requests a tank to release x amounts of y gas. This will be accomplished by adding a tank pumping machine which will either burst or explode a tank, releasing the gas inside. The gas currently requested are BZ, Nitryl, Halon and Nob.
The overarching goal of this compressor machine is to present a gas synthesis challange for the players and to get them more accustomed to how a tank explodes. The gas synthesis part can always be changed in order to reflect the current state of atmospheric reactions.
## C. Explosion Changes (Mid-Late Game)
### C.1 Cause and effect.
The main theme of the explosion changes is establishing cause and effect of explosions. Reactions that happens inside a tank that's going to explode will be recorded and forwarded to a doppler array. Some experiments will require only a single cause to be present (think of it as isolating a variable). This is currently implemented for nobliumformation and pressure based bombs. Having other reactions occuring besides noblium formation will fail the first one, while having any reactions at all will fail the second one.
Adding more explosions here will be a slight challange because as of now the game has only two reactions that can reliably make an explosion.
### C.2 Tools upgrade.
Doppler array has now been retrofitted to state the probable cause of an explosion, be it reactions or just overpressurization on gas merging. These should help intermediate players figure out what is causing an explosion.
Added a new functionality to the implosion compressor:
Basically performs the gas merging and reaction that TTV does in a machine and reports the results back as if someone uses an analyzer on them. Here to give players feedback so they can try and understand what is actually going on in a bomb.
## D. Player Interaction
There should be more room for more than 1 player to play ordnance simultaneously. Previously players are also able to split tasks, but this rarely happens because tritium synthesis needs only the gas chamber to be reconfigured. Now, different players can pick different experiments and work on them. Players can also do joint tasks on one single experiment. Gases like noblium will need tritium production and also a cooling module online.
Ordnance can also coordinate with their parent department on what they really need, be it money or research bonuses.
# Potential Changes
The best-case changes that can be implemented if the current roster of content isn't enough is more reactions that can be used in bombs. Eliminating bombs entirely goes against the spirit of the subdepartment, while adding new ones will need a lot of care and consideration.
Another possible change is to implement a "gas payload" bomb. Bombs that has a set number of unreacting gas inside that will increase the heat capacity, reduce the payload, and neccesitates more bespoke mixes.
Adding more gas synthesis experiments is discouraged. The main focus of ordnance should be bombs, with gas synthesis being a side project for ordnance. These are present to ease the introduction to bombs and provide some side content.
There should be a somewhat well-justified goal in adding new synthesis experiments: e.g. BZ is there as a "tutorial" gas, Nitryl to introduce players to cooling/heating mixes, Halon to a more efficient tritium production, and Nob as a nudge to nobformation bombs and mastery over other aspects.
# Conclusion / Summary
Add more experiments to ordnance that players can take, accomplish this by:
1. Making the players perform gas synthesis or make bombs.
2. Have them collect the data, see if it fits the criteria. Explain why if it fits and why if it doesn't.
3. Have the player publish a paper.
Reward them based on how well did they do, give players agency both on the experiment phase and also publication phase.
---
TLDR: Added new experiment to toxins, added the framework for those experiments existing. Experiments comes in gas synthesis and also bombs but with more parameters. Experiments needs to be published through papers, various choices to be made there.
Implementation notes:
Because of how paper works, ordnance experiments are handled outside of experiment_handler components. My reasoning for this is twofold:
The experiments will be completed manually on publication and if the experiment isn't unlocked yet it will still be completed.
Experiment handler datums have several procs which require an atom-level parent, and I figured this is the most sensible and cleanest way to implement this without changing the experiment handler datum too much.
Small change to /obj/machinery/proc/power_change() signal ordering to adjust the state first and then send the signal. Didn't found any other usage of this signal except mine but barge down my door if it broke something.
Rewrote the ttv merge_gases() code to be slightly more readable.
A small code improvement for thermomachine to use tofixed (my fault).
Ordnance have been updated to enable the publication of papers
Several new explosive and gas synthesis experiments have been added to ordnance
Anomaly compressor has been TGUIzed and now supports simulating the reaction of the gases inside the ttv.
New tank compressor machine for toxins. You can overpressurize tanks with exotic gases and complete experiments.
Several techweb nodes are locked and require toxin experiments to complete.
Toxins can purchase boosts for various techweb nodes.
You no longer need to anchor doppler arrays for it to work.
Doppler array and implosion compressor now supports deconstruction, implosion compressor construction added.
Doppler now emits a red light to denote it's direction and it being on. Doppler not malf.
Implosion compressor renamed to anomaly refinery.
Created a new program tab "Science" for the downloader app. Removed Robotics.
Reworked the code for bombspawner (used in the cuban pete arcade game)
## About The Pull Request
stop forgetting to include mapload, if you don't include it then every single subtype past it by default doesn't include it
for example, `obj/item` didn't include mapload so every single item by default didn't fill in mapload

## Regex used:
procs without args, not even regex
`/Initialize()`
procs with args
`\/Initialize\((?!mapload)((.)*\w)?`
cleanup of things i didn't want to mapload:
`\/datum\/(.)*\/Initialize\(mapload`
Repaths everything referring to "toxins" while actually meaning either the room in science or plasma gas. While this PR might be disrespectful to our forefathers, given this is (I believe) a holdover from as far back as the Exadv1 days, this has constantly irked me since I started working with the code. None of the player-facing stuff has referred to plasma as toxin since before 4407 hit, besides the Toxins Lab, and yet all of the type-paths are still pointing at toxins, making it a nightmare to search for in a map editor, and making the code needlessly easy to confuse with that of toxin damage. So this just fires it into the sun.
Anything relating to Toxins, the science subdepartment, now makes reference to Ordnance instead. This felt fitting enough given the focus of the subdepartment is around the creation of and testing of explosives.
Anything relating to plasma gas has, fittingly, been made to refer to plasma gas.
Edit: Ah yes, I feel I should probably apologise off the bat for the size of this PR- the code touched is mostly atmos machinery and simplemobs, a few sprites here and there, and of course the station maps + a few offstation maps.
Makes the code more legible and makes mapping less painful.
(The payment has been made)
Converts most spans into span procs. Mostly used regex for this and sorted out any compile time errors afterwards so there could be some bugs.
Was initially going to do defines, but ninja said to make it into a proc, and if there's any overhead, they can easily be changed to defines.
Makes it easier to control the formatting and prevents typos when creating spans as it'll runtime if you misspell instead of silently failing.
Reduces the code you need to write when writing spans, as you don't need to close the span as that's automatically handled by the proc.
(Note from Lemon: This should be converted to defines once we update the minimum version to 514. Didn't do it now because byond pain and such)
* Adds explosion SFX to the blastcannon and explosive compressor
- Extracts the explosion SFX and screenshake proc from the SSexplosions explosion handling proc and lets the explosive compressor and blastcannon use it.
* Miscellaneous changes
- Adds defines for the internal explosion arglist keys
- Reverses the values of the explosion severity defines
- Changes almost everything that uses `/proc/explosion` to use named arguments
- Removes a whole bunch of argname = 0 in explosion calls.
* Removes named callback arguments.
* Changes the explosion signals to just use the arguments list
Adds a simple framework to let objects respond to explosions occurring inside of them.
Changes a whole bunch of explosions to use the object being exploded as the origin of the explosion rather than the turf the object is on.
Makes the explosive compressor and blastcannon actually use the TTVs they are given.
Adds support for things responding to internal explosions.
Less snowflake code for the explosive compressor and blastcannon calculating bomb range.*
Less confusing explosion severity defines.
Less opaque explosion arguments
*does not guarantee that the solution to letting them actually use the TTV is any less snowflake.
Makes tanks use obj_integrity instead of their own snowflaked version.
Makes tanks check for exploding when they are destroyed, rather than once every process.
Makes tanks always leak their gases when they are deconstructed.
Removes the ability for tanks to seal themselves back up over time.
Makes the bomb spawner actually produce functional bombs.
Removes the extraneous syndicate bomb spawner subtype.
Miscellaneous code improvements to tanks, bomb spawners, and the blastcannon.
Fixes the explosives compressor doubling the power of any bomb you put in it.
The changes to tank rupturing behavior shouldn't effect most tritium fueled TTVs including the 50K recipe. Toxins players don't need to worry about suddenly being incapable of getting points or refining anomaly cores. They should only really effect singlecaps, but I don't know enough about singlecaps to know what recipes I should test. I have confirmation that at least one mix is not effected by this.
The self-sealing properties of tanks have been removed. I'm not sure what the purpose of it was, I have heard that it was used to enable hand-portable plasmaflooding, but I'm not familiar with the practice.
As it turns out, the basic bomb spawners were broken on master! I have made the bombs they produce maxcap instead of just spring a leak. Since they maxcap by default now I have removed the syndicate subtype used to spawn the TTV produced by the cuban pete arcade game and replaced it with the normal timer subtype. Since none of the bomb spawner subtypes were used for anything else this shouldn't have any effect on the game.
On a similar note, I have discovered that the maxcap recipe on the wiki stopped working at some point since it was written. I will replace it with a functioning set of instructions.
Less snowflake code.
Bomb spawners are actually functional now.
Slightly better code.
The explosives compressor accurately reflects the power of the bomb you put into it.
Converts many proc overrides to properly use list/modifiers, fixes some spots where modifiers should have been passed, calls modifiers what it is, a lazy list, and cleans up some improper arg names like L, M, C, and N. Oh and I think there was a spot where someone was trying to pass M.name in as a string, but forgot to wrap it in []. I fixed that too.
Done using this command sed -Ei 's/(\s*\S+)\s*\t+/\1 /g' code/**/*.dm
We have countless examples in the codebase with this style gone wrong, and defines and such being on hideously different levels of indentation. Fixing this to keep the alignment involves tainting the blames of code your PR doesn't need to be touching at all. And ultimately, it's hideous.
There are some files that this sed makes uglier. I can fix these when they are pointed out, but I believe this is ultimately for the greater good of readability. I'm more concerned with if any strings relied on this.
Hi codeowners!
Co-authored-by: Jared-Fogle <35135081+Jared-Fogle@users.noreply.github.com>
- Backtick-escape code samples which contain `[]` syntax.
- Fix all crosslinks to nonexistent symbols.
- Somewhat improve docs for qdel defines, research defines, dynamic mode, and others.
- Remove unused bloodcrawling defines.
Some crosslinks to defined but undocumented symbols remain. For BYOND builtins, a future dmdoc version may link those symbols to their entries in the DM reference. Other symbols could be documented by a future PR.
New "file" crosslinks as used in `research.dm` are slated for release in a future dmdoc version.
Remake of #50528
About The Pull Request
https://hackmd.io/@tgstation/r1tzxpwPL
Basically that.
Raw anomaly cores
Cargo crates for them (currently 5k credits each, please tell me if this is good I balanced it relative to other crates I have no clue what the current cargo "meta"/power levels are)
Finish the explosive/implosion compressor attackby and implosion procs
Map in the implosion compressor
Map in the roundstart 2 cores each type for science
Current values are set to maxcap at the 8th core, and 4 light radius (1/2/4 explosion required) at the first core. I think this is a bit low but I'm just going off the document.
The implosion compressor consumes the TTV + tanks on an attempted detonation, regardless of success. However, the "bare minimum" of checks are included (it won't let you insert incomplete TTVs. It will however, let you insert TTVs that have no explosive potential (test your bombs like you test your code ;) ), and will not waste the raw core if you fail to make a high enough radius.
Props to @ArcaneMusic for the machine sprite!
Why It's Good For The Game
image
Start of the anomaly core system I guess, gives toxins a use other than doing the quirky 50k maxcap tritium speedrun rush (or was that removed already?).
Yadda yadda allows locking items behind it and another method of getting these other than supermatter overloads (I don't know if that is already gone either by the by).
Changelog
🆑
add: An explosion compressor has been added to science. It makes raw anomaly cores into proper anomaly cores using prepared TTVs of a specific required blast radius.
/🆑